Do my dyno numbers seem low to you? - Page 2 - MustangForums.com



4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2013, 08:47 PM   #11
Cali_Swag
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Cali_Swag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: California
Posts: 104
Default

Ok guys thanks for the input. I guess the numbers are decent for what I have. Based on the graph at what point should I shift to get the best times?
Cali_Swag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 08:48 PM   #12
Cali_Swag
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Cali_Swag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: California
Posts: 104
Default

Also I plan on getting a real dyno tune after my xpipe and steeda pulleys are installed
Cali_Swag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 08:49 PM   #13
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

it's a damn good curve, got within 15whp of your peak number all the way from 4500 to 6300. I think with a dyno tune you may get better peak numbers more torwards 280 which is where I think those cams should put you with a good tune. but is the cost of the dyno tune worth that much? with the good curve I'd say no just leave it.

for track times get a dr and 12's are available when you get some more practice.
ctgreddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 08:50 PM   #14
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali_Swag View Post
Also I plan on getting a real dyno tune after my xpipe and steeda pulleys are installed
If you've still got a stock midpipe then I think the numbers and a canned tune are good and what i'd expect.
ctgreddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2013, 06:30 AM   #15
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,612
Default

Tis the world of a naturally aspirated 4.6
uberstang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 08:43 AM   #16
CobraFrenzy
3rd Gear Member
 
CobraFrenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uberstang1 View Post
Tis the world of a naturally aspirated 4.6
he means they DOONNT WOOOORRRKKK OOUUUTTT
CobraFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 06:17 AM   #17
Gary Ugarek
4th Gear Member
 
Gary Ugarek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,181
Default

OP, I was once bummed about Dyno numbers on my 13 5.0, then after a while I stopped caring and realized fast is in the eye of the person behind the wheel.

265hp out of 4.6L isn't bad, and those are rear wheel numbers (assuming you dyno'd the whole car, not just the engine) Stock they were getting 210 at the Rear Wheels, so the mods you put in and the numbers are decent for a 4.6L

If you're going to spend money on anything... may I suggest lowering it. Grab some Ford Racing B Lowering Springs... right now it's looks like a 4x4.
Gary Ugarek is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Snow performance stage 2 MAF boos cooler install jwog666 Pipes, Boost & Juice 5 04-04-2016 04:23 PM
TNT, New PB TCStangerv6 Street/Strip 12 10-11-2015 05:57 PM
Hi - Yes, I'm a gal and need help CS2007 General Tech 7 09-29-2015 07:38 PM
USA Today Weighs in on 2016 Mustang VS Camaro Numbers MustangForums Editor Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion 0 09-23-2015 01:28 PM
Evolution Performance Car Show/Dyno Day 9/12/15 The01Cav North East 0 09-05-2015 03:39 PM


Tags
dyno, rwhp

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.