New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base
The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 4.6L V8 Specific General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2006, 06:09 PM   #1
prototype_x9
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
Default 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

check ou this video.

This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
prototype_x9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 06:17 PM   #2
bl1nk
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,871
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

...LMAO... first thing I saw ..how retarded you ricers are.. "at ONLY 24 psi"

I love how ricers come in here trying to bash Mustangs because they know were better and faster. How sad it is that they had to crank that litle hunk of junk up to 24 lbs in order to get the same hp as that Stang. Then you dont have the common sense to know that 2 cars with the same HP... wow the lighter one is going to win! Not to mention it looked like the Cobra just had a bad launch.. Gotta love these import fags.. go back to your little honda or subaru boards or where ever you come from

I wonder how many bridges or drive through signs that humongous wing has hit... O and that evo must have won because of the added HP from all those stickers on the side!!
__________________

bl1nk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 06:20 PM   #3
GTlust
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 675
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

How long will that 2.0L last producing 500hp? I'm assuming that ain't with the stock engine. Seems like a good way to kill that tiny engine.

GTlust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 07:31 PM   #4
lukoi66
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 207
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

he run what he brung and won as they saying goes. No biggie. The Cobra will be around for awhile. The EVO not so much....plus since when are they collectible A pyhrric victory at best I think.
lukoi66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 07:41 PM   #5
pinoy
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 134
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

I wouldnt rag on EVOs. The EVOs are more for track racing rather than drag racing. That huge wing in the back is for actual downforce. So please dont go ragging on EVOs if you dont know what they are capable of. My buddy owns an EVO 9 and boy are they fast. My mustang barely beats him. OF course both of our cars are not stock. But yea those EVOs have my respect because they are damn nice cars.
__________________
pinoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 08:07 PM   #6
bl1nk
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,871
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

No car (minus F1 race cars and the like) will EVER have the need for a wing that big. Even with 500 hp that car cant go fast enough to need that wing, thats like saying it needs a front splitter and rear diffuser. BS! Wings on regular cars are USELESS and mearly for looks. Nowhere in my post did I say it wasnt a fast car, I just said it was a piece of crap.
__________________

bl1nk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 08:11 PM   #7
hammeron
6th Gear Member
 
hammeron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Nicely done
Posts: 9,729
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

rice = doo doo

__________________
2006 GT Supercharged



Whipple Crew
FRPP Hot Rod Cams
M-5230-S (KR's)
hammeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 08:21 PM   #8
GTlust
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 675
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

That's true about the wing, i'm not a fan of the wing on my GT. On a side not, 20 inch rims are about as usefull, but that doesn't stop plenty of people here from buying them.

Quote:
ORIGINAL: bl1nkage

No car (minus F1 race cars and the like) will EVER have the need for a wing that big. Even with 500 hp that car cant go fast enough to need that wing, thats like saying it needs a front splitter and rear diffuser. BS! Wings on regular cars are USELESS and mearly for looks. Nowhere in my post did I say it wasnt a fast car, I just said it was a piece of crap.
GTlust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 08:28 PM   #9
P Zero
5th Gear Member
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Vehicle: 1993 Ranger XLT 5.0L
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,870
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

b|1kage, Obviously you dont drive fast enough to notice downforce. My '85 spoiler is actually functional, it actually produces downforce, granted you have to be traveling 130+ to notice it but it does work. I put on a 87-93 GT wing and I swear to god those things actually produce lift at the same speeds. And most wings on cars arent there to produce downforce, theyre there to reduce lift. And aerodynamics come into play long before that. Have you ever driven a big SUV on a very windy day? Has it ever shoved you over a lane on the highway? Next time theres a lot of wind where you live, go drive a big truck and then go drive your stang. Then we'll see what you think. But then again you dont need your aerodynamics, do you?
-P.
__________________
P Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 08:45 PM   #10
darkfact
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 182
Default RE: 500 rwhp mustang vs. 500 awhp evo

that evo is fast as hell, but.... i can only see driving that car if i was a track junkie only.

personally i care equally about looks and performance and can honestly say that even if the evo was three times as fast as a cobra i still wouldn't ever, even for a second, consider buying it. i think the exhilaration i get everytime i sit in my stang more than makes up for the speed of that evo, and in the evo i'd have to hide my face so people don't see me driving it. sorry but it looks like every other neon/civic/focus/(insert any other compact auto here) to me.
__________________
2006 GT Premium, Vista Blue Auto
C&L CAI, SCT w/Brenspeed 93 tune, Corsa A/Bs, Kenwood/MTX audio
darkfact is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company