The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 4.6L V8 Specific General Discussion > 4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2006, 07:57 PM   #1
jmart69x
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Default Shorty Headers Versus Longtube Headers

My mechanic tells me that unless I plan on installing a supercharger on my 06 GT (which I do not plan on doing), it is really not worth the expense of installing Long Tube Headers. He says that Long Tube headers on a naturally-asperated car actually slow it down? He recommends that I install FRPP shorties. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that on the new mustang GT (05-07) shorties really weren't much more effective than the stock manifold. My mechanic claims that shorties are good for an additional 8-10 horsepower. I asked him about mid-length headers which he advised me not to get. Can anyone confirm or deny my mechanics claims?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
jmart69x
jmart69x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 08:05 PM   #2
2006GTSC
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 604
Send a message via AIM to 2006GTSC Send a message via Yahoo to 2006GTSC
Default RE: Shorty Headers Versus Longtube Headers

From what I heard, shorties aren't worth it. That's why I got Long Tubes. I'm not supercharged neither. I do not think the shorties gain 8-10.
__________________
Saleen Supercharger 11.5PSI

2006GTSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 08:27 PM   #3
CrazyAl
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,544
Default RE: Shorty Headers Versus Longtube Headers


Quote:
ORIGINAL: jmart69x

My mechanic tells me that unless I plan on installing a supercharger on my 06 GT (which I do not plan on doing), it is really not worth the expense of installing Long Tube Headers. He says that Long Tube headers on a naturally-asperated car actually slow it down? He recommends that I install FRPP shorties. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that on the new mustang GT (05-07) shorties really weren't much more effective than the stock manifold. My mechanic claims that shorties are good for an additional 8-10 horsepower. I asked him about mid-length headers which he advised me not to get. Can anyone confirm or deny my mechanics claims?
That "mechanic" has NO CLUE.

He actually has it backwards.

Longtube headers make the most HP, especially on a naturally aspirated motor. First you have to understand why headers make HP. First off, both shorties and longtubes are designed to provide smooth passageways which the exhaust gases can flow through. They have gentle curves and smooth shapes which provides as little restriction as possible to the exhaust. This is an improvement over cast iron manifolds, which have a rough finish from the casting process, and which usually have tight turns with little regard to smooth flow. (As a side note, the OEM manifolds are actually very good as far as manifolds go)

Second--and this applies only to Longtubes--the diameter and length of the primaries (the tube between the exhaust port and the header collector) are carefully chosen to match the operating RPM range of the engine. Also, all the tubes are made to the same length (which is why some header tubes snake back and forth) The idea is that the exhaust gas pulse from one cylinder can be timed (with the correct length of primary) to literally help SUCK the exhaust gas out of another cylinder later in the firing order. This is called scavenging. Scavenging gets rid of the exhaust gas from the cylinder faster, which in turn brings in a fuller, denser, intake charge.

Shorty headers don't scavenge becasue the primaries are too short and are usually not equal length. All shorties can do is smooth out the flow a little bit compared to stock. LT headers do this AND they scavenge. That's why shorties are worth between 3-5 HP, and longtubes are worth 15-25 RWHP.

On a supercharged car things are much less important. Because you've got pump literally FORCING air into the engine, scavenging is an insignificant detail. On a supercharged car you don't really care about exhaust tuning. You want the shortest, least restrictive, set of pipes you can get.

__________________
Black 2006 GT Coupe
Dynatech LT headers & X; Borla catback
C&L CAI; 93 oct tune
Full BMR, Spohn & Steeda suspension
D-Specs; Alum driveshaft
Second Skin Audio damping; Infinity spkrs;
Goodyear Eagle F1 255F/295R - FR500 wheels
CrazyAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 09:36 PM   #4
jmart69x
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Default RE: Shorty Headers Versus Longtube Headers

CrazyAl, thanks for the info and confirming what I thought all along! Any thoughts on midlength headers? I am wondering if I should consider these because I have a lowered car and I am concerned about bottoming out, and also longtube headers may not be legal in my state.
__________________
jmart69x
jmart69x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:16 AM   #5
dowork
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 199
Default

yea i was wondering the same thing i lowered my car with the eibach pro kit so its only lowered about 1 inch will i have to worry about bottoming out with the LTs? and let me get this straight if im planing on gettin a supercharger i should go with shortys?
__________________
2002 mustang GT

k&n fipk, mgw shifter, eibach pro kit, grille delete, borla cat bac, sct tuner and steeda pulleys

dowork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:49 AM   #6
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Legion5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: Saleen Thinger, Vert, Bike, Magic Pumpkin.
Location: Bright Springs Posts: 13,541
Posts: 2,473
Default

post links to the mid length headers because most people haven't heard of them.

Also header whether shorties or not help the most on a supercharged car because they are much less restrictive than the stock, it's like blowing through a straw vs a straw full of grass. It still is important whether it's restrictive or not. you'll get a larger gain out of an SC car from longtube than from an NA car.
__________________

::Cornering with the Tail Drifting at 110 mph::

Tip of the Month, October: Do not buy the $730 Roush Exhaust which a Mangnaflow rep says costs to $117 make (polished, all ss), buy the $170 Roush Exhaust Tips estimated to cost $46 to make and weld them to another company's muffler. This also lets you choose how your car sounds.

Rear seats, superior to carrying your children in your mouth. - Mustang vs Corvette slogan

Last edited by Legion5; 01-17-2009 at 02:05 AM.
Legion5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 02:46 AM   #7
retfr8flyr
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 552
Default

Find a new mechanic that guy is clueless. As CrazyAL explained if your going to stay N/A L/T's are the only way to go, shorties don't offer any improvement over stock manifolds. Stay with 1 5/8 in tubes on the L/T's also for N/A application you only need the 1 3/4 inch for FI. The Kooks are about the best L/T for a N/A setup as they are more 3/4 than full length like the American Racing and others. Those are the 2 brands I would recommend as they are both offer top notch quality and fitment. I had Kooks on mine when it was N/A and loved them.


Earl
__________________
Auto, TurboHorspower TT, GT500 fuel pumps, PI T/Q, Spydershaft Drive Shaft, 3.73 gears with Detroit True-Trac, Moser Axles, Wilwood Frt & Rear Brakes and more.
retfr8flyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 10:43 AM   #8
dowork
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 199
Default

bbk anyone? or would you recommend something else? i can get a pair of hooker headers ceramic coated for 500
__________________
2002 mustang GT

k&n fipk, mgw shifter, eibach pro kit, grille delete, borla cat bac, sct tuner and steeda pulleys

dowork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 12:11 PM   #9
R-code17815
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 2003 Mach 1
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 59
Default

I love my Bassani Mid-length headers! Shorties on a 4.6 are a waste of time, no real gains for the money. Long tube headers will make more torque than the mids (maybe 5ft lbs) and the horse power may be down 2-3 compared to long tubes but, YOU MUST REMOVE ONE LONG TUBE HEADER TO REMOVE THE TRANNY/CLUTCH. Mid length headers leave plenty of room, I even did a T56 swap with both headers on...piece of cake.
__________________
R-code17815 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 03:59 PM   #10
Heavyg72
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Vehicle: 2006 GT Convertible
Location: Maryland
Posts: 770
Default

I'm lowered with Roush springs and have the Kook LT's and have no clearance issues. I don't think they are full length but the fit is awesome.
__________________
06 GT Vert Tungsten Gray
Paxton Novi 2200 H.O. Intercooled
Brenspeed Dyno Tune
482RWHP/408RWTQ
Kook LT w/cat'd H
Auto w/3.73
TCI Streetfigher TC
Roush Front/Real Springs

Paxton Crew Member
Heavyg72 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
46, 5, 50, equal, gains, headers, horsepower, length, long, longtube, mustang, shorty, shortys, tube, versus, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company