You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Do any of you notice a MPG drop after installing the supercharger outside of when you're really getting into the machine? I'm curious if the drag of the charger belt affects this much, or, if like a turbo system, the difference is small when out of boost range.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
lol, my MPG dropped dramatically...but my problem is i cant seem to keep my foot out of the thottle
word of advice...if you are truely worried about MPG, then a supercharger is not for you.
__________________
Procharged 10PSI H.O. Intercooled
498whp/445wtq
For sale: plasma booster ignition
Quote:
Red Turbo Integra
That's the plan. The only thing that sucks is I have a dentist apointment in the morning. Hopefully all the numbing sh1t wears off quick so I don't look like a retard drooling on myself.
I have 3 2005+ Mustangs, 1 with a Procharger HO Stage II kit, 1 with the Paxton Novi2200 kit, and 1 with the Impulse Garrett TWIN TURBO kit.
Of of these things SUCK GAS! All of these cars have stock t-bodies and JBA shorties (except the turbo car obviously) and no cams.
The turbo car actually gets about 14 around town. the blower cars get between 10 and 12. And when your foots in it, all bets are off. I ran my car at Irwindale Speedway on the outer over to inner oval drift track for an entire weekend. My dash said .8mpg average!
Significant drop in mileage, even when out of the throttle. From 18-19 in the city to 14-15. Depends on the traffic you drive in too, stop and go is a killer for economy. If you can cruise at a steady rate it's much better.
__________________
Whipple @ 9 psi - 445rwhp/400rwtq - 12.07 @ 118.7 mph
Steeda sport springs - Steeda strut mounts - Steeda TriAx- Steeda Adjustable Panhard Bar - Steeda Axleback - D-Spec shocks - J&M LCAs - FRPP 4.10s - GT500 spoiler -
And probably more I can't remember
All work done by owner
I'm not super concerned about MPG in general, but I am the type that enjoys power, but can manage to stay out of boost for the majority of my driving. My dads vehicle, a pretty heavily modified BMW 335, still gets great mileage despite being pretty far from stock. I realize that its a 6 cylinder and that helps tons, but was curious if the MPG loss from having to drive a belt all the time for the supercharger was significant. I am more experienced with turbocharger cars, and should I pick up a Stang, I'd probably be leaning more towards the Hellios (or whatever its titled) system.
My current car gets about 28 hwy and 18-20 city, however my car before that, a 66 gmc that I fuel injected, got 10 reg, 14- hwy, so having a car in the middle wont hurt me too badly.
Any years that fair better for FI than others on these Stangs?
The spark plug issue with the 2005-1st half 2008 mustangs would be enough to make me get a 2009+. The spark plug issue is with 2-piece design in the plug that is prone to breaking in half when the plugs are removed, leaving half the plug stuck in the head. There's a process to get it out, but I'd MUCH rather skip the possibility of that every happening.
In the 2nd half of 2008, ford switched spark plug & head designs so that this isn't an issue anymore.
__________________
Show: Cervini Type IV hood & chin spoiler, GT500 rear spoiler, Silverhorse Racing Louvers
Go: JDM-tuned E-Force, full Bassani exhaust
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company