Notices
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, or gearing can be asked here!

Any Ideas on expanding CFM of Kenne Bell 2.6LC Intake Plenum to 1300cfm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:29 PM
  #1  
hollywub
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hollywub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 310
Default Any Ideas on expanding CFM of Kenne Bell 2.6LC Intake Plenum to 1300cfm

Hi All,

The intake plenum on the Kenne Bell 2.6lc is 1000cfm. The Ford Racing twin 62mm throttle body is about 1306cfm.

My idea is to increase the intake plenum CFM to 1300 cfm, by 30%.

I know I can fabricate a new plenum, but I was thinking of making an adapter to add to the current plenum, sort of a large throttle body spacer.

Before doing this, does anyone have any ideas if this will work? I know that when guys make sheetmetal plenums, they increase the body volume of the plenum, not the length.

Would adding 30% more volume with a "spacer" flow well enough?

I don't want to waste the new ported heads and cams with a restrictive intake...

Anyone with applied knowledge to add would be much appreciated.
hollywub is offline  
Old 08-05-2012, 11:07 PM
  #2  
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,491
Default

Think of the most restrictive single plane point in the intake. That point is going to dictate the max cfm you can flow. Think wider and taller opening, not longer. The reason sheetmetal is popular is because it is thin and strong.
Diabolical! is offline  
Old 08-05-2012, 11:19 PM
  #3  
hollywub
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hollywub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by Diabolical!
Think of the most restrictive single plane point in the intake. That point is going to dictate the max cfm you can flow. Think wider and taller opening, not longer. The reason sheetmetal is popular is because it is thin and strong.
Right. Makes sense. That is why the intakes are always a little "fatter" when fabricated, not longer.

I wonder what the inlet on the back of the actual supercharger can flow. Guess I need to take it apart.Kenne Bell is a horrible source for information. They just say 1000 cfm 2.6 and 1800 for Mammoth...

I would hate to go through the trouble of making a new inlet plenum for no gain.

I can tell you this. I went to a full 4" intake tube and ditched the KB plastic oval intake and my AFR went from 11.2 to 11.8.

I think it is a good test to see if the new plenum flows better with the same throttle body and intake tube by watching the AFR lean out or not...

Last edited by hollywub; 08-05-2012 at 11:24 PM.
hollywub is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 08:39 AM
  #4  
ziperhead
2nd Gear Member
 
ziperhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 264
Default

What is a 2.6lc? I am only aware of the 2.6S and 2.6H
ziperhead is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 03:34 PM
  #5  
hollywub
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hollywub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by ziperhead
What is a 2.6lc? I am only aware of the 2.6S and 2.6H
It's the "liquid cooled". It's probably the 2.6s sc...
hollywub is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:32 PM
  #6  
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,491
Default

Originally Posted by hollywub
Right. Makes sense. That is why the intakes are always a little "fatter" when fabricated, not longer.

I wonder what the inlet on the back of the actual supercharger can flow. Guess I need to take it apart.Kenne Bell is a horrible source for information. They just say 1000 cfm 2.6 and 1800 for Mammoth...

I would hate to go through the trouble of making a new inlet plenum for no gain.

I can tell you this. I went to a full 4" intake tube and ditched the KB plastic oval intake and my AFR went from 11.2 to 11.8.

I think it is a good test to see if the new plenum flows better with the same throttle body and intake tube by watching the AFR lean out or not...
I'd be curious to know how that affected intake temps. It seems that intake temps are the achilles heel of the kenne bell, and squeezing a lot of air through a little space definitely ups the temps. You might have stumbled onto something that will help out the kenne bell guys a LOT.
Diabolical! is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:21 PM
  #7  
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
moosestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default

Originally Posted by Diabolical!
Think of the most restrictive single plane point in the intake. That point is going to dictate the max cfm you can flow. Think wider and taller opening, not longer. The reason sheetmetal is popular is because it is thin and strong.
And cheap! You can't exactly bend sheets of aluminum into an intake.


When are you going to get the one for the whipple?
moosestang is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:26 PM
  #8  
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
moosestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default

Originally Posted by hollywub

I can tell you this. I went to a full 4" intake tube and ditched the KB plastic oval intake and my AFR went from 11.2 to 11.8.

I think it is a good test to see if the new plenum flows better with the same throttle body and intake tube by watching the AFR lean out or not...
I was thinking the same thing about watching the AFR. you could also datalog the MAF or watch it using an aeroforce gauge. it displays the MAF in lbs/min.


Last edited by moosestang; 08-07-2012 at 03:57 PM.
moosestang is offline  
Old 08-08-2012, 12:14 PM
  #9  
hollywub
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hollywub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by Diabolical!
I'd be curious to know how that affected intake temps. It seems that intake temps are the achilles heel of the kenne bell, and squeezing a lot of air through a little space definitely ups the temps. You might have stumbled onto something that will help out the kenne bell guys a LOT.
The 2.8 runs cooler at 15 psi than the 2.6s at 15psi. It could be 2 things. much largero plenum and throtle body or larger sc volume.

I think you are right about it being the small volume of the plenum at the back of the sc creating some heat.

I would also love to build a spacer in between the sc and the lower manifold to do an air to air setup. I have a few inches of room with my hood.

It really does run hot. With 2 heat exchangers and 3 spal fans I run about 70 degrees above ambient temp. Sometimes up to 80 degrees.

I am going to work on the plenum first though.
hollywub is offline  
Old 08-08-2012, 12:18 PM
  #10  
hollywub
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hollywub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 310
Default

Anyone know what type of sheetmetal is usually used? Is it just 1/8 inch standard sheet metal?
I thought aluminum was used. The mounts to the throttle body and supercharger looked aluminum to me as well...
hollywub is offline  


Quick Reply: Any Ideas on expanding CFM of Kenne Bell 2.6LC Intake Plenum to 1300cfm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.