New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base
The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4 Cylinder NA and Turbo > 4 Cylinder General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2008, 08:52 AM   #11
sleeper_inc
6th Gear Member
1988 FORD Mustang
 
sleeper_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1988, Mustang, LX
Location: Regina Beach, Sask
Posts: 9,965
Default

Ok, hellion mentioned he thought it was a 351C to me but later on he said he found out it was only a 302
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
sleeper_inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 02:50 PM   #12
TRBOPWR
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1985 SVOx2, 1986 SVO
Location: Wooster/Bucyrus OH
Posts: 1,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 92lxsleeper View Post
because hellion is in the 4 cyl section like me. we both had 2.3s at one time and have moved on to bigger and badder toys =P lol
I don't think you moved on to bigger things when you got that Fiat

I will be the first to admit that i'm not knowledgable on the old trucks and/or carb motor potential. But 350 hp with headers, a cam, intake and carb seems kinda far fetched. But hey, at least you are having fun with it. I would definitely try to own something a bit better on gas by summer though lol
__________________


Sig courtesy of Tombohum

1985 SVO 13.62 @ ~97mph with 1.74 60' and 20 psi, on the brakes trying to keep from breaking out!
TRBOPWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 08:41 AM   #13
killer91
1st Gear Member
1970 Ford F-100
My Garage
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Vehicle: 1984 mustang gt turbo
Location:
Posts: 149
Send a message via AIM to killer91
Default

lol mine has a 5sp in it out of a 90 mustang and i get almost 20mpg. its got the 302 2bbl.
i have to agree i dont see you being at 350hp with that they came stock with 175hp. It might be the rear gears that your feeling.
__________________
1970 ford f100 and 1984 mustang gt turbo, and 84 mustang gt!
rust- cheap/lazy mans weight remover
killer91 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company