New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base
The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4 Cylinder NA and Turbo > 4 Cylinder General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2009, 01:05 PM   #11
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 30
Default

Gibson makes some tubular exhaust manifolds for '88-'98 fullsize halfton GM pickups, I'll bet these would match right up to either an '87-'93 5.0 H-pipe, or a 351w-swap H-pipe. If you're interested, search www.summitracing.com for SUM-G9014-9. I don't know if these would clear your steering.
For long tubes, I guess I would start by trying some for a '67-'69 Camaro.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 01:26 PM   #12
fast65
5th Gear Member
1984 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
fast65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 1965 Mustang GT, 1984 Mustang SVO
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,081
Send a message via AIM to fast65 Send a message via Yahoo to fast65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun View Post
mg man, thank you for living the golden rule. I shall regard you as a friend.

Now, I don't understand the forum definition of troll, yet, but some girls look at me like I might be descended from one, I'm not handsome, so I'll let that ride until someone explains.
Ignorant? Ignorance isn't bad. It's a condition of not having sought-after information. But if you meant it as an insult, you're way off. I have a genius-level IQ.
Well I apologize, I mistook the meaning of your thread as putting down the 2.3T. Sorry bout that.
__________________


'65 Mustang GT-stroker 347 w/Toploader 4-speed
'84 SVO-2.3T at 17 psi
fast65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 01:57 PM   #13
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 30
Default

then we're cool. 2.3s are great if you don't need 400+ rwhp. I do.
I left out an important detail about my swap. Between the SBC block and the moroso mounts, I had a set of Advance Adapters plates for putting the SBC into an s-10 that had a 4.3. Summit sells them as PN ADD-713123. There are 4 pieces in this kit. I wasn't using the smaller 2.
Also I wish to note that just because something fit for me doesn't mean you don't need to check yours for yourself. My crossmember had a slot to allow front-to-back adjustment, the Advance plates are slotted fore-to-aft, and it's most important that the slip yoke be 1" from bottomed with the rear of the car supported by the rear axle only, not letting the axle hang while jackstands hold the body. Best to put the stands under the axle.
If this means having to clearance the oilpan with a hammer, that's okay.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 12:30 PM   #14
F1aReD
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 596
Send a message via AIM to F1aReD
Default

Whats this with everyone wanting to put chevy parts into a ford? I just think chevy should stay with chevy and ford should stay with ford..but I guess it could be interesting
__________________
1992 Mustang LX Convertible 2.3-Totalled
1995 Dodge Neon-5 speed-Girlfriends "winter beater"
1998 Nissan Sentra-Project
F1aReD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2009, 08:48 AM   #15
WyldeSoul
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 118
Default

Hehe, well, obviously you've not heard of Matt Culpepepper, or John Hubor... Both pushing out way more than 400 hp, out of the Lima OHC I4. I think John's got his bored to 2.9L, and is doing well over 900hp, and an 8 second quarter mile, street legal.

The 2.3's aren't just playthings.
__________________
Good morning is an oxymoron.
WyldeSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2009, 10:11 AM   #16
sleeper_inc
6th Gear Member
1988 FORD Mustang
 
sleeper_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1988, Mustang, LX
Location: Regina Beach, Sask
Posts: 9,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyldeSoul View Post
Hehe, well, obviously you've not heard of Matt Culpepepper, or John Hubor... Both pushing out way more than 400 hp, out of the Lima OHC I4. I think John's got his bored to 2.9L, and is doing well over 900hp, and an 8 second quarter mile, street legal.

The 2.3's aren't just playthings.
John - 3.0L now with a tall deck 2.5 from ford, stroker kit from esslinger, nice engine bay, tuned, blah blah blah. Around 600-700hp, 8's

JD - filled 2.5 (small journal 2.3 block with a 2.5 crank) running 9's

matt - project bolt on - completely untouched long block, holset, nitrous, 3.55, 5.0 T5, FMIC, 10's
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
sleeper_inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:02 PM   #17
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 30
Default

I'm ressurrecting this thread because I'm going to ressurrect the car in question, my '89 Mustang LX hatch that was built with a 2.3L/A4LD combo. The original axle and wheels and interior are all long gone, along with the 2.3 and A4. Right now it's sitting in the East corral, (fitting for a 'stang, no?) with a 5.3L version of the LS1, and an empty 4L60E sitting in it for lack of anywhere else to store it. But now I'm going to chronicle what to do to improve a 2.3L mustang for the least money. I've spent days figuring the costs of a Ford 347 stroker, a Ford 351W, a Chevy LS1, and a Chevy 350.
I live at 4500' elev., and anything less than about 340 ci just is NOT enough. Now, I know how to get the 350 to return 27 mpg highway, so that's the build I'm going for. If you're copying this, heres the first part of your shopping list: 235/60R15 rear tires, 225/60R15 front tires, a 700R-4, a Painless Wiring lockup kit, a good QuadraJet carburetor or some form of EFI, a double-hump (for dual exhaust) trans crossmember from a 5.0/AOD '86-'93 Mustang, and from here on each thing can go one of 2 ways. But one key point is that the 700R-4 is extremely similar, dimensionally, to the AOD, and I expect the AOD driveshaft to work fine with just a conversion-style u-joint at the front, and a 700R-4 slip yoke. of course a new rear joint while I'm at it, and having the assembly checked for straightness and re-balanced. I'll use a Camaro mount, but still the AOD crossmember drops too low, by something like 1.6", but I'll get to that later.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:04 PM   #18
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 30
Default

By the way, I will start posting pics, part numbers, sources and prices, and I'll start from scratch, since I've used up all my stuff on other projects. Lastly for today, don't expect to see this car driving by spring. I'm not working that fast.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 01:36 PM   #19
TRBOPWR
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1985 SVOx2, 1986 SVO
Location: Wooster/Bucyrus OH
Posts: 1,080
Default

So you need 400+ horsepower in your cars, and you are going to put it to the ground with a 235 tire? Mmmmkay, good luck with that.

BTW, I like the screenname.
__________________


Sig courtesy of Tombohum

1985 SVO 13.62 @ ~97mph with 1.74 60' and 20 psi, on the brakes trying to keep from breaking out!
TRBOPWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 12:40 PM   #20
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 30
Default

I never said any particular HP number. I never even mentioned hooking it up. Though this combo hooks pretty well even without drag radials. Assuming you know how to get a foxstang to hook. Anyway, I failed to type that this build calls for a 3.08:1 axle ratio.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
add713123, ais, dual, snorkel

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company