The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4 Cylinder NA and Turbo > 4 Cylinder General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2009, 03:24 PM   #1
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default My Intro

Hey all,
I'm a three-timer, first an '81 2.3, then an '85, now an '89. I'm kinda disappointed to see no recent threads in here debating the merits of which brand and size of V8 to swap in. So all you folks do is turbo your 2.3, or go to the 5.0 with it's appropriate forum? Bummer. I stuck a 350 Chev in my '85, and I have an LS1 for my '89.
The best turbo anything I ever drove was an '87 Conquest TSI, and I wonder how anyone can be satisfied with a turbo 4.
If anyone wants to discuss a chevy V8 or a "new hemi" into your fox, lemme hear from ya. peace.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 04:52 PM   #2
mg man 75
5th Gear Member
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1989 Mustang LX
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,034
Default

Welcome. Probably won't hear much mention on engine changes here. Most that posters wanting to change to 5.0 we send to 5.0 section. Most here not done it. Me included. I done the 2.3 turbo swap in a 89 Notch. Well happy with it. But this started as project to put 2.3 turbo in MGB. Wife wanted a Mustang. I am probably the only one of few here also with Mustang motor swap. But doing 3.2 SHO in Mustang.
http://s177.photobucket.com/albums/w...20converiable/
__________________
89 mustang 86 2.3turbo motor c-4 trans http://www.fquick.com/89-2.3turbo http://s177.photobucket.com/albums/w...20converiable/
mg man 75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 05:35 PM   #3
fast65
5th Gear Member
1984 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
fast65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 1965 Mustang GT, 1984 Mustang SVO
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,082
Send a message via AIM to fast65 Send a message via Yahoo to fast65
Default

Welcome I guess, I'm really not sure if this guy is actually that ignorant or if he's just another troll.
__________________


'65 Mustang GT-stroker 347 w/Toploader 4-speed
'84 SVO-2.3T at 17 psi
fast65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 09:43 PM   #4
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default

mg man, thank you for living the golden rule. I shall regard you as a friend.

Now, I don't understand the forum definition of troll, yet, but some girls look at me like I might be descended from one, I'm not handsome, so I'll let that ride until someone explains.
Ignorant? Ignorance isn't bad. It's a condition of not having sought-after information. But if you meant it as an insult, you're way off. I have a genius-level IQ.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 01:07 AM   #5
sleeper_inc
6th Gear Member
1988 FORD Mustang
 
sleeper_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1988, Mustang, LX
Location: Regina Beach, Sask
Posts: 9,965
Default

I like you. Your a person I can get along with

I've done a 2.3 turbo swap on my car (its a dd) and I'm hopping to pick up a pre 87 mustang and shove my dads built 400CID chevy into it... or his worked 350

Motors are motors, and cars are cars

Welcome to the forums, post some pictures damnit!
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
sleeper_inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:03 AM   #6
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default

Hey sleeper inc, thanks for the greeting.
You ever done a SBC into a foxstang before?
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:57 AM   #7
sleeper_inc
6th Gear Member
1988 FORD Mustang
 
sleeper_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1988, Mustang, LX
Location: Regina Beach, Sask
Posts: 9,965
Default

Not yet, I know you'll have to modify the k-member and either buy expensive headers or make a custom set, but I don't rly care lol
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
sleeper_inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 12:10 PM   #8
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default

I didn't have to modify my k-member. And I didn't use the AJE tubular k, either.
Here's what I did: (sorry, pics are long gone)
'85 Mustang 2.3, drove it into garage. Removed battery, radiator, driveshaft, transmission crossmember, then engine and trans with mounts. Dumpstered everything except battery.
Next, GM T5 has rear mount same distance from engine as 700R-4. Got a bare 305 block, and a mostly empty 700R-4 case with tailshaft and housing and slip yoke. Bolted them together. Put a Camaro oilpan on the block. Added Moroso's solid motor mounts for '82-'92 camaro. Part numbers 62510 and 62610.
Oops, my food is done. I'll continue this in a min.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 12:25 PM   #9
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default

I put that in the car, then went to Pick-N-Pull for a double hump trans crossmember. In the area with the foxstangs, I found one just lying all by itself. I had to walk 2 rows to find a foxstang to try it under, but it fit, so I took it with me. I found a driveshaft from a 5.0/AOD foxstang, and took that, too, then paid and left.
So, I installed that crossmember under the 700R-4, and aside from the crossmember's mounting pad being way angled, it lined up really well. I got a trans mount for a 91 camaro, and soon had that whole deal all bolted together, and the Morosos were still resting on the K-member.
Next I bolted the "new" driveshaft to the 7.5, and pushed the 700's slip yoke all the way in. Then I slid it back 1", and measured u-joint center to u-joint center. I wrote it down, then meadured the "new" shaft to see if it could be shortened. To my surprise, it was close enough! I took the shaft and the 700's slip yoke to Six States, and they ordered me a conversion u-joint.
Meanwhile, I bought a Sharpie, and returned to the stang.
I made sure the engine was centered in the bay, then traced the sharpie around the morosos. Underneath, The oilpan was clearing everything, barely, but barely works with solid mounts.
I pulled the block and trans out, removed the morosos from the block, and positioned them on the K according to the earlier tracings. I duct-taped them in place, and drilled 5/16" holes. Nearly hit the p/s stuff. Careful.
Then I drilled extra holes right through the morosos. After that, I removed them and began tapping the new holes in the stang for 3/8" bolts. Then enlarged my extra holes in the morosos to 3/8".
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 12:35 PM   #10
Atilla the Fun
1989 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang LX
Location: confusion
Posts: 33
Default

Then before bolting the new engine and trans in, I bought a bunch of new grade 10 3/8 bolts and nuts. with regular lockwashers and a bottle of loctite.
I was able to get lockwashers and nuts on some of the bolts, and in some holes I had to use pretty short bolts, but I installed a good 355 and 700R-4, as I had no T5 on hand. The 700 uses the same slip yoke and driveshaft length as the GM T5 anyway. I installed the driveshaft, but never even started on an exhaust system, beyond test-fitting a few different exhaust manifolds. I sold the car at that point. Things suddenly got desperate, money-wise.
But the 350 did fit under the stock hood. With a ZZ4 intake manifold, a QuadraJet, and a 14x3" open element air cleaner. I tried an AIS dual-snorkel, but it would not clear.
Atilla the Fun is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
408w, add713123, ais, dual, mile, quarter, snorkel

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company