You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Tomorrow. I need to fix the damn valve cover breather, keeps poping off. I also need to buy a temp gauge (mine died[&o]) and fix an exhaust leak on the DP (getting the part next weekend I think)
Other than that I've been driving it all day and I've found out its still not getting the best gas mileage. But then again I was drive against the wind[&:]
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
I think my car's MPG has improved alot, on my drive to our new house with is like 20miles and I was going up hills and florring it a little bit.... I think i get like 18mpg now or around that. I didnt see that needle move as much. last time i drove 20 miles I used 1/4 of a tank. And I think i used about 18 of a tank
IDK what kinda mileage I get, but it doesn't seem ass good as the N/A. It take about a "tick" (87-93 owner know what I'm talking about) to drive 85km's (52.81miles) so... idk, whats your avg. for a tank of gas??? lol it looks like I can get 500 or so miles to a tank lol
Anyways I can live with that for now. But IDK how long lol
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
When I had my 93 convertible with a a4ld, it would only pull around 16 mpg so that's like 250 mi a tank. The convertibles are quite a bit heavier than a hatch though. [&:]
__________________
1989 Mark VII LSC
World class T5, 3.27:1 Trak-lok, MAF conversion with A9L ECM, Walbro 255lph fuel pump, Magnaflow catback 2.5" pipe, Weld Rodlites
Your suppose to run 91 or higher. I'm running 87 because I have a PK1 computer (very rich fuel map) so I feel safe, plus I've taken a few degrees timing out, and the knock sensor is on. Once I find a good job I'll always be running 91 or higher
the reason i said 91 is because you said you dont have 93 octane
i run 97 octane with some octane booster and lemme tell you i save no gas lmao
__________________
the answer to a speed junkie's adrenaline is a turbo charger
Drove the car to school today. It did well but the transmission is eating (ok leaking) transmission fluid, so I need a new trans soon If I add fluid this one will last over winter
Ok, anyways.... Car it TONS of fun to drive even with only 8 (spiking to 10) PSI, very nice and good on gas. I would tell anyone who drives up hills to do this swap, great amount of HP and good gas mileage
__________________
1988 Mustang LX
Ex 2.3 N/A car, was a 2.3 turbo, now getting a complete forged & stroked 408W, shooting for a TT setup
1992 GMC Sonoma 4x4
185,000km's|4.3 auto|current DD getting 24mpg
1991 Mazda MX6 DX
299,000 km's (over 186K miles)| TOTALED!
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company