You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
__________________
89 2.3 Turbo, 82 T-Top Notch 5.0, 86 LX T-Top 5.0 roller and 86 GT Black in and out with Gt 40X Heads, Smoothed Engine Bay, Battery in Trunk, SLP's, Bolt-on's
I say his is not tuned correct or not driven correct. 1991 is 0 to 6.6 sec and 1999 it 0 to 60 7.5 . My source is here. http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/SHOpage.htm Was considering a v-6 sho in a mustang. It can be converted to rwd. Ps the fastest one is a v-6.
I don't think he was trying. Surely an SHO would take less than 14 seconds to get to 60. My mustang (estimate) gets to 60 in like 8.5-9 seconds. I'm sure an SHO is faster than that. Also consider that he was turning a corner.
__________________
"The battery is discharging, the oil temperature is very high, the oil pressure is very low, the engine temperature is off the end of the scale, I'm running out of petrol, but the clock is correct!"- James May
Do your homework before you open your mouth. Its a 3.4L that has been built by yamaha. Ford built the block, Yamaha built the rest. They only made 235 horsepower, and im sorry, a 4 banger mustang wont beat it. My buddy has one, and it dusted my 3.8L bird, and my 3.8L bird would dust 2.3L mustangs. You do the math.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
a V8 that we can beat
