Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007, 06:41 PM
  #1  
Johnny Venomous
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Venomous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 71
Default Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference


Is there a big difference in the sound between short and long tube headers. I know the long tubes breath better and make more horsies but they are so damn expensive. Just trying to figure out if it is worth the extra expense and installation hassle, short tubes seem so much easier. By the way , generally how much more power do the long tubes make over the shorties.
Johnny Venomous is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 06:59 PM
  #2  
Thurman
5th Gear Member
 
Thurman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,273
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

Don't waste your money on shorties.
World of difference on l/t's. Sound and performance. I had shorties and sold them
Thurman is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:14 PM
  #3  
Bluestar
5th Gear Member
 
Bluestar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,997
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

Opinions are like . Mine is, long tubes, which may or may not give a little more power than Shorties, are much more costly. Shorties on the other hand replace your stock exhaust manifolds, and retain the Cat's in their stock location, a plus, if your State has emmision inspections. 5.0 Mag this month has a write-up on long tubes, they dynoed before and after the install......10 HP gain.
Bluestar is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:22 PM
  #4  
CroDalmatinac
4th Gear Member
 
CroDalmatinac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,157
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

I have a V6 but I'll chime in my opinion aswell. I have LT headers and while they do give you added power, they delete the cats (since I have O/R H-Pipe aswell). I'm not too sure about the GT but without the CATS on a V6, it sounds like legit crap at 2,500 RPM. Damn I need to find some CATS that will fit my MAC LT's and MAC O/R Hipe =(
CroDalmatinac is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:23 PM
  #5  
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
howarmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 16,087
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

big difference between the 6 and 8 and how the exhaust sounds
howarmat is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:38 PM
  #6  
cmschlatt
2nd Gear Member
 
cmschlatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 225
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

ORIGINAL: CroDalmatinac

I have a V6 but I'll chime in my opinion aswell. I have LT headers and while they do give you added power, they delete the cats (since I have O/R H-Pipe aswell). I'm not too sure about the GT but without the CATS on a V6, it sounds like legit crap at 2,500 RPM. Damn I need to find some CATS that will fit my MAC LT's and MAC O/R Hipe =(
instead of trying to find some cats, you should just sell me your mac lt's
cmschlatt is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:41 PM
  #7  
olvanish
3rd Gear Member
 
olvanish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 929
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

If i were to get headers I'd definitely get LT's. Gains that you get from shorties are nothing compared to LT's even after you do the math with dollars/hp. Only thing is they are not street legal and we get raped here in Cali for having stuff like that on our cars.
olvanish is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 01:19 AM
  #8  
Caution
5th Gear Member
 
Caution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,132
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

A buddy of mine here on the boards has a very similar set to my stang... the differance is that he has LT and I have shorty's... he only dyno's 4 RWHP over me... thats it. You're right though.. the emissions here in CA suck so when I get pulled it's much easier to swap a midpipe to pass a CA Police inspection as apposed to having to swapp headers and a midpipe... thats the reason I went with shorty's over LT

ORIGINAL: Bluestar

Opinions are like . Mine is, long tubes, which may or may not give a little more power than Shorties, are much more costly. Shorties on the other hand replace your stock exhaust manifolds, and retain the Cat's in their stock location, a plus, if your State has emmision inspections. 5.0 Mag this month has a write-up on long tubes, they dynoed before and after the install......10 HP gain.
Caution is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 03:00 AM
  #9  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default RE: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference

c'mon man, get the LT's. dont get shorties, regret it and then get long tubes later. that would be real expensive. if you are wondering the difference is now, you will regret it if you get shorties. nothing wrong w/ shorties, they are better than stock, they look great in the engine, but i think the LT's are worth it.

[sm=badbadbad.gif]
onederful100 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msavoia23
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
12
07-07-2018 12:08 PM
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
05-03-2018 10:38 PM
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
7
08-29-2015 06:30 PM
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM
Evilwilly
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
08-25-2015 10:30 PM



Quick Reply: Long Tube vs Short Tube Header sound difference



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.