The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2007, 01:06 AM   #1
telsonman
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Vehicle: 1987 GT
Location: Northeast GA
Posts: 616
Default FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

ok, i got a xe270 that i paid $250 plus for. i work for ford and was wondering if i should just order a FRPP cam, but i've heard such bad things about them. i can get them for around $120 i think, and i could return the xe and save money. i'm just trying to see if i should put my money into them if they are "so bad".
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Proudly Served
Squad Leader. Infantry
Operations Iraqi & Enduring Freedom
telsonman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 01:17 AM   #2
bds95stang
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 270
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

not bad...just old technology
bds95stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 01:18 AM   #3
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 77 II, 06 GT
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 7,943
Send a message via AIM to my77stang Send a message via MSN to my77stang Send a message via Yahoo to my77stang
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

keep what you have
__________________
my77stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 01:32 AM   #4
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

Quote:
ORIGINAL: bds95stang

not bad...just old technology
I am old tech......Ford is old tech....pushrod engines is old tech.....does that make it bad?.....(I know....2 out of 3 ain't bad).......

FRPP cams = Crane cams (most of them)........I do suggest to degree them and you'll find out.....I did!......
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 01:34 AM   #5
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 77 II, 06 GT
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 7,943
Send a message via AIM to my77stang Send a message via MSN to my77stang Send a message via Yahoo to my77stang
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

its not that a ford cam is a crane or not or whatever (quality is top notch either way), its the grind profiles. the ford cams are single pattern, low tech design. getting into something dual pattern will help the exhaust side breathe better and you will make more power
__________________
my77stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 01:49 AM   #6
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

Quote:
ORIGINAL: my77stang

its not that a ford cam is a crane or not or whatever (quality is top notch either way), its the grind profiles. the ford cams are single pattern, low tech design. getting into something dual pattern will help the exhaust side breathe better and you will make more power
[sm=trust_me.gif] ....quality IS an issue, like I said, I found out. Now.....getting into the Ford = dual pattern always favoring the exhaust, everything else is old tech case.......isn't that the same as saying that a single pattern cam with a split rocker ratios setup (1.6 Intake/1.7 exhaust) could do the job?.......

Why did Ford Engineers favored the intake when they redesigned the "speed density" roller cam from a 266°/266° duration to a "mass air" 276°/266° duration cam?.......instead of a 266°/276° duration cam?..
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 02:11 AM   #7
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,109
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

its not that they are bad cams. they were great cams at one time. technology has changed and there are better cams to choose from now
__________________


7.25 @ 95.17MPH with a 1.70 60' on street tires and low boost-untuned and never been on the dyno

TWIN TURBO!! Keep drooling, I'm spooling
luckythirteen13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 02:50 AM   #8
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 77 II, 06 GT
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 7,943
Send a message via AIM to my77stang Send a message via MSN to my77stang Send a message via Yahoo to my77stang
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

i meant quality isnt an issue when comparing crane and frpp - they are both going to be a quality product in terms of metallurgy
__________________
my77stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 03:11 AM   #9
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

Within the limitations of SADI cores.....yup.
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2007, 06:37 AM   #10
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 845
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

most frpp cams are designed with low lift figures so they can be used with stock pistons, heads etc.

dont bother running one, most people buy e303's beacuse they have a slightly choppy idle. you can get the same sound with more lift from a modern cam and make more power.

i am not a fan of crane cams. i seen one fail in under75 miles in my buddys 351c, after 6 months of back and forth crane agreeded to pony up for a new motor. block, crank, heads etc. after they got the cam back they said it much have been cracked durring manufacturing and was not noticable.

its good they finally took care of him but he lost his numbers matching motor from his 70 mach1. he got stuck with all the machine work, and half the cost of the block. they said they would allow up to $175 for a block, the best he found was $350.
__________________
mrbigshot is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company