The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-17-2005, 01:31 AM   #61
promustanperformance
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 353
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance

Ford racing's shorty headers M-9430-P50 and M-9430-P51 are now angled for compatibility with GT-40P heads. They go for about 250 stainless steel, and $300 ceramic coated. I wonder what kind of fitting issues you would encounter trying to use the headers from the explorer you take them off of...I doubt it would fit, and most likely wouldn't be worth the time or money trying to customize it.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Michael Clark
Pro Mustang Performance
North Kingstown, RI
www.ProMustangPerformance.com
1-877-718-4603 Toll Free / 401-438-0461 Local
Mon-Fri 8am-5pm EST

Pro Mustang Performance, Where You're More Than Just An Order
promustanperformance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 12:23 AM   #62
WizardBlack
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 144
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance

Anyone want to recommend which cars you could swipe the MAF setup from (or parts of it) for the speed density guys (87~88) to convert to mass air?

Mark
WizardBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 09:17 PM   #63
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Vehicle: 84 Mustang, 59 Ranchero
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,686
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance

I was at a 'pick-a-part type wrecker today in Tucson,Az.
Complete 5.0's for $150, what they call 'basic' meaning no accessories, $125.
8.8 axles, complete, drum to drum, $50.
Dunno about AOD's didn't ask.
They had probably 5-6 already pulled and I saw another 3-4 in cars while searching for some small parts for my '84.....
Patrts are out there guys.,,,,
__________________
GOOD,FAST, CHEAP-----------YOU CAN ONLY GET 2 OUT OF 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 01:29 AM   #64
rmodel65
2nd Amendment Gear Member
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 1965, ford, mustang fastback
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 9,379
Send a message via AIM to rmodel65 Send a message via MSN to rmodel65 Send a message via Yahoo to rmodel65
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance

diesel mark 7 disk brakes and 3.73s factory and 93 cobra spec radiator
__________________


Founder Rmodel's Mustang Militia



“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
~Samuel Adams
rmodel65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 10:33 PM   #65
MustangGT3420
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 132
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance


Quote:
ORIGINAL: FoxGT

If you know any salvage yard parts that will increase performance for the 5.0L mustang tell about them here.

1982-'83 Lincoln Continental, Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, 1987-'88 Lincoln Mark VII LSC, or SVO Mustang can be used for rear disk brakes on the mustang.

I know the Ford Explorer GT40 intake & GT40P heads offer quite a few hp, but I am unsure the year(s) they came on the Explorer.

The 91 & below year mustang starters can be replaced with the ligher more efficient units on 92+ mustangs.
you should get a cold air intake, and a spoiler i found some at the local salvage yard they werent that great but juss thought you should know
__________________
MustangGT3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 12:48 AM   #66
FastToys4Life
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 123
Default RE: Junkyard/DIY Performance

I have a 9 rearend, How do I convert it to posi? Is it even possible?
__________________



MY GARAGE
67 coupe (rustang lol)
04 gsxr 1000 R.I.P.
FastToys4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2005, 03:58 AM   #67
l0gik2
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
Default RE: Junkyard performance

-i have heard that the factory computer calibration in the 88 mustangs with 5.0s perform better, and each year after that the calibration got less powerful. for 88-93's I'd guess. I think for even the 5 bucks or whatever they would charge u at pick n pull u probably won't see enuf difference doing this tho.

-I got a 600 dollar alarm out of a car for 5 dollars. works doors, remote start, windows, trunk, gas lid, everything it was a steal. ordered a remote for it for 35 dollars online. Definitely worth looking out for, if your not afraid of installing one. It came off a 88 mustang, I drive a 90 mustang so everything is already set up correctly just wire it in using wiring diagrams.

-turbo ford probe injectors are like 24 lbs i think and will work on mustangs. U have to find 2 turbo probes to get enuf injectors tho.
l0gik2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2005, 10:57 PM   #68
rob_boura
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 181
Send a message via AIM to rob_boura Send a message via Yahoo to rob_boura
Default RE: Junkyard performance

289 heads give grat power on the uper end and will bolt rite up to a 5.0 block i know from experience my cusin has gt40 gead and i had 289 heads on my old car 91 hatch but i always got him with thoes heads the 289 heads are verry high compression be careful one back fire of thoes are costly it will snap the crank and distributor post be care ful if attempted i know from experience
__________________
rob_boura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 11:10 AM   #69
RacerX
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 199
Default RE: Junkyard performance

I also hear that the Explorer engine parts are a good up grade. Heads,etc.
__________________
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
RacerX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:02 PM   #70
chord509
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 128
Send a message via ICQ to chord509 Send a message via AIM to chord509 Send a message via Yahoo to chord509
Default RE: Junkyard performance

A note on the Lincoln Mark VII rear end, the Mark VII came in three different configurations: 1) standard 2.73:1, 2) LSC 3.27:1, and 3) turbo diesel 3.73:1. Thought that may help some of you junkyard dogs a little as far as identification goes.

EDIT: these ratios are for the 1985 Marck VII's.
__________________
Black '85 5.0 w/T-tops
Weiand X-celerator intake

Quote:
ORIGINAL: FoxRod
Can't all of us domestic guys just learn to love each other and hate imports together. LOL. J/K
chord509 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1987, 50, diesel, diy, explorer, ford, gt40, heads, junk, junkyard, lincoln, lsc, mustang, performance, se, turbocharged, vii, yard

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company