The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2008, 02:28 PM   #1
tyler72
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Apison, TN
Posts: 912
Default 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

OK, so I get the Edelbrock Performer RPM total power package installed on my 72 Coupeand droveit for less than 5 miles. I was having all kinds of fun enjoying the 6000 RPM rev limiter on the MSD 6AL. When I reached my destination (less than 5 miles) the oil light came on and stayed on and the rocker arms began to clatter (due to loss of oil pressure). Well, to get to the point, the oil pump ate itself alive.Even after installing a new high volume pump and flushing the engine out the oil pressure still kinda sucks and the lifters are full of metal shavings I assume b/c they wont pump up and adjust right. So, the bearings are getting worse and worse and it runs like crap now. Im planning on pulling it out to have it hot tanked and cleaned out, but I cant decide whether to just replace all the bearings (I found the crank to be just fine when I pulled the main caps off while changing the pump) and leave it a 302, or to go ahead and buy a stroker kit. Im definatly leaning towards the stroker kit, but which do y'all like better, the 331 kit or the 347 kit? I have heard the 331 has a better rod ratio and will wind up a lot faster than the 347. Let me know your opinions. Thanks!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Tuners are like Tampons... Every Pussy has one! 72 Mustang Coupe. 347 stroker with Edelbrock Performer RPM Heads. Coast High cam. RPM air gap intake with a 650 Demon. Ceramic coated headers. MSD billet distributor, 6AL box, Blaster 3 coil, MSD wires.
tyler72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 02:32 PM   #2
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 67 Mustang Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 7,341
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

Depends on where you want to make power and what you want to do with it.
__________________
Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

13.20's with 2.25-2.30 60's, 40+ year old suspension sucks!
Best trap 107.11mph, we'll see what the new intake/carb setup does.
12.80 at 110.5mph NHRA DA corrected
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 02:34 PM   #3
kweb288
5th Gear Member
1992 Ford Mustang
 
kweb288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 1992, hatch
Location: St. Charles Il, and ISU
Posts: 2,597
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

from what i hear, because i thought the same thing, the 347 rod ratio's have gotten a lot better these days, i am personally going with the 347 because of the cubic inches, now you probably wont, and cant get over 100,000 miles off of a build like that (but that is a lot of driving) but i figure as long as it last a couple seasons of abuse why not for the extra power
__________________
Currently putting an 04 cobra engine in my fox http://www.mymustangproject1.webs.com

kweb288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 05:00 PM   #4
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 77 II, 06 GT
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 7,891
Send a message via AIM to my77stang Send a message via MSN to my77stang Send a message via Yahoo to my77stang
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

dude why not just tear down, clean out your lifters, and put new bearings in your motor? seems simple enough?
__________________
my77stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 05:15 PM   #5
kweb288
5th Gear Member
1992 Ford Mustang
 
kweb288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 1992, hatch
Location: St. Charles Il, and ISU
Posts: 2,597
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

ya but if he has it apart why not upgrade
__________________
Currently putting an 04 cobra engine in my fox http://www.mymustangproject1.webs.com

kweb288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:55 PM   #6
tyler72
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Apison, TN
Posts: 912
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

See, the engine only has like 7,000 miles on it if even that. the block was bored at the previous rebuild so there is not really a wearridge at the top of the block. If i stroke it, the only extra work i would have to do would be clearance the block and maybe a very very slight ridge reaming. I just figure that if im gonna do all that work why not go bigger and better while im that far into in? But still, the question is a 331 or a 347 better? The car is really heavy (its a 72 coupe), its got a C4 that will have a 2800 stall converter when I pull the motor, and aTCI valve bodyand billet servo.It has the edelbrock Performer RPM cam that's rated for 1,500 to 6,500 RPM, and has a 650 CFMBarry Grant vacuum secondary Speed Demon carb.The car is by no means a daily driver (ive only put about 6000 miles on it in 3 years) but it is a street/show car. I may occasionally take it to the strip to run it, so I will eventually replace the 2.70 gear with a 3.55 or 3.73. Now, with all that said, what are your opinions about which is better for what im going to be doing?
__________________
Tuners are like Tampons... Every Pussy has one! 72 Mustang Coupe. 347 stroker with Edelbrock Performer RPM Heads. Coast High cam. RPM air gap intake with a 650 Demon. Ceramic coated headers. MSD billet distributor, 6AL box, Blaster 3 coil, MSD wires.
tyler72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:03 PM   #7
mjr46
Sheriff/Mr. Ballbreaker
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 23,266
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

347 is better!! now I know people will flame me for that comment..[sm=badbadbad.gif][sm=icon_flaming.gif][sm=guilty.gif]but there is no replacement for displacement....and I just got done rebuilding a rear in a 95 stang that has a 347 with close to 100k on it and no oil burning at all
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudeboy View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:04 PM   #8
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

A 347 for sure....and if you want the best kit and service go here.
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:10 PM   #9
mjr46
Sheriff/Mr. Ballbreaker
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 23,266
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Joel5.0

A 347 for sure....and if you want the best kit and service go here.
you da' man JOEL 5.0^^^^^^^^[sm=exactly.gif]
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudeboy View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:16 PM   #10
tyler72
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Apison, TN
Posts: 912
Default RE: 331 VS. 347 Which is better?

Thats a nice kit and all, but im a college student and dont have that much extra cash ( I just spend $3,300 on all the parts listed in the first thread, plus a few more things). I can get a kit off of ebay with all new high quality brand name parts for $700 to the door. If i get a kit im gonna go with them b/c of the price tag. It comes with forged rods & pistons, a lightweight cast crank, and rings and bearings.
__________________
Tuners are like Tampons... Every Pussy has one! 72 Mustang Coupe. 347 stroker with Edelbrock Performer RPM Heads. Coast High cam. RPM air gap intake with a 650 Demon. Ceramic coated headers. MSD billet distributor, 6AL box, Blaster 3 coil, MSD wires.
tyler72 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company