The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2005, 06:52 PM   #1
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle: 95, Ford, Mustang GT
Location:
Posts: 538
Default 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Hey just wondering what the basic hp and torque of these engine's are? And if there are any real problem's with these moter's and what would be the least expensive to do. looking into doing one.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
"The faster your car is the better it looks"

331 Stroker
E85 Tune
SRP Pistons
Eagle Rods/Crank
GT40P Heads
TFS Intake & Cam
BBK Headers
C&L MAF
BBK TB
K&N CAI
To much to list

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/84587
95_302_StangMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 07:25 PM   #2
SDelgado87
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 65
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

I believe the 302 is rated at 215-225 HP if that helps any

Also I heard the 347 has an oil burning issue...
__________________
91 Mustang 5.0 LX

BBK Offroad H Pipe
40 Series 2 Chamber Flowmasters
SDelgado87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 10:04 PM   #3
Grn N Gry 5OH
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle: 1983, 1992
Location: VA
Posts: 5,853
Send a message via AIM to Grn N Gry 5OH
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Quote:
ORIGINAL: SDelgado87

I believe the 302 is rated at 215-225 HP if that helps any

Also I heard the 347 has an oil burning issue...
used to......most of the companies have fixed 'em....i KNOW CHP doesnt have oil burning issues anymore............at least i dont think so.....

and ive heard usually, its like 1hp per cubic inch usually when its got a good set of heads and exhaust and the goodies, but, im not promising nothing, so, dont hold me to it
__________________
'92 GT-bbk shorties, bbk o/r h-pipe, 2.5" flowmaster cat-back, Pro 5.0 shifter, march underdrives, bbk fenderwell mount

'83 GT-newly acquired. project car. carb'd 302. hopefully 408 single turbo eventually when all is said and done
Grn N Gry 5OH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 10:09 PM   #4
90Mustangfan
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,259
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

the oil burning problem for the 347 is still there, now they start burning oil at 50,000 miles instead of 30,000 miles, as before. they temorally fixed it. it just last longer with out burning oil...
90Mustangfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 10:14 PM   #5
Grn N Gry 5OH
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle: 1983, 1992
Location: VA
Posts: 5,853
Send a message via AIM to Grn N Gry 5OH
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

ohhh. ok. either way, i can deal with some oil burning for the gobs of torque you get out of a 347
__________________
'92 GT-bbk shorties, bbk o/r h-pipe, 2.5" flowmaster cat-back, Pro 5.0 shifter, march underdrives, bbk fenderwell mount

'83 GT-newly acquired. project car. carb'd 302. hopefully 408 single turbo eventually when all is said and done
Grn N Gry 5OH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 10:18 PM   #6
C/Note
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,911
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

306 is just a bored 30 over 302... if i take off 2 plug wires .i got a 306...
C/Note is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 02:34 AM   #7
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Kentucky
Posts: 1,485
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Quote:
ORIGINAL: 90Mustangfan

the oil burning problem for the 347 is still there, now they start burning oil at 50,000 miles instead of 30,000 miles, as before. they temorally fixed it. it just last longer with out burning oil...
Actually the reason a 347 used to burn oil was because the wristpin interfeared with the oil ring. The old 347s burned oil all the time because of this. From the time you turned your fresh 347 over for the first time, the oil burning was happening. It wasnt a wear issue, it was a design issue, so milage didnt matter. Coast High Performance's 347 kits burn NO oil due to an innovative piston design. They guarntee their 347's will run just as long and trouble free as their 331's. The life expectancy of both engines is 100,000 miles. The owner of CHP said the only reason he still offers the 331 is because so many people are still gunshy of the 347.
__________________
BBK L/T's
BBK Shorty O/R H
Original 2 Chamber Flows (dumps)
Hurst Shifter
Kirban AFPR
3.73's
94Cbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 04:17 AM   #8
Magiarn71
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 646
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Someone posted something somewhere about the oiling issue really being about the increased angle of the rod /piston on the longer throw crank. Any truth to that?
Magiarn71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 11:23 AM   #9
hawkwitastang
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 41
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

yeah well a bored 30 over 302 is still fun to play with thats what I've got and it has plenty of adrenaline inducing power and torque though I don't know the numbers
Quote:
ORIGINAL: NOS/408

306 is just a bored 30 over 302... if i take off 2 plug wires .i got a 306...
__________________
1983 Gt. 5.0 bored 30 over, shorty headers, true dual exhaust, 4 bbl holley 550cfm. 7.5" rear end 2.73 gears 4speed tranny
hawkwitastang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 12:32 PM   #10
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle: 95, Ford, Mustang GT
Location:
Posts: 538
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Hey thanks for the info so far, also i have heard that with the new 347 kit's they dont burn oil, one more question so what do you guys think is a better moter 331 or 347 with the oil issue apart and which reqires less work and money?
__________________
"The faster your car is the better it looks"

331 Stroker
E85 Tune
SRP Pistons
Eagle Rods/Crank
GT40P Heads
TFS Intake & Cam
BBK Headers
C&L MAF
BBK TB
K&N CAI
To much to list

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/84587
95_302_StangMan is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
30, 302, 306, 331, 347, 40, boost, bored, chp, coast, engines, ford, mustang, stroker, torque, vs, vs306

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company