The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2009, 06:08 AM   #11
302army187
5th Gear Member
1989 Ford Mustang
 
302army187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 89 mustang lx 'vert
Location: colorado
Posts: 3,300
Default

this is good info, keep it coming

im looking into something to tune my junk.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
302; Cobra T5, 4.10's, ported E7's, Typhoon intake, full bolton's, full exhaust, NX 100-150wet shot
UPR upper/lower control arms, MM full length subframes, Strange Engineering 10way Shocks & Struts
Mods on the way: Ported&O-Ringed Trick Flow heads, TF stage 2 cam, a/c removal, battery relocation

Thanks for the sig' Xeno!
302army187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:42 AM   #12
MADMAC
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 1994 GT
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 193
Default

What Editor (Running Windows Vista) would you recommend for QuarterHorse and what supporting hardware is needed for reading wide band and future supercharger? I have an SN95. This sounds like a system that is some what user friendly. This has me very interested. I had been looking at the PMS for a while, but I would like to stay with the change of time and of course the $$$. My next purchase will be a tuner and I would like to spend some time working the learning curve with my mostly stock 5.0. Sorry about the highjack, maybe this will help in his descision. MAC
__________________
94 GT, BBK cer. L/T headers, O/F "H" pipes, Typhoon intake, 65mm Throttle body, Griffin 2 core radiator, FMS 3.73, carbon fiber clutches 31 spline axles, Alum. Drive shaft, Center Force Dual Friction Clutch, Energy Motor/trans mounts. Ret. Navy
MADMAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 04:00 PM   #13
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,856
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MADMAC View Post
What Editor (Running Windows Vista) would you recommend for QuarterHorse and what supporting hardware is needed for reading wide band and future supercharger? I have an SN95. This sounds like a system that is some what user friendly. This has me very interested. I had been looking at the PMS for a while, but I would like to stay with the change of time and of course the $$$. My next purchase will be a tuner and I would like to spend some time working the learning curve with my mostly stock 5.0. Sorry about the highjack, maybe this will help in his descision. MAC
I have had very good luck with the software available through www.eecanalyzer.net

Clint stands behind his software 110% and is literally willing to bend over backwards to fix ANY problems you might have with it.

As far as running a wideband with the QH, I had already deleted the EGR on my car. There is a variable that you can program into the Binary Editor software that allows you to set a new transfer function for the EVP sensor. I set all of my wideband values in the transfer function table, and ran the analog 5v signal output off my AEM 6in1 wideband into the EVP connector (pin 27?) on the SN-95 harness. I then told Binary Editor to treat that input as if it was an AFR reading. So now when I datalog, my wideband information comes up along with the infor from ALL of my other sensors as well..

This then helps you with using EEC Analyzer. because you can take your datalog, load it into EA, and the software will calculate a "corrected" maf curve for your car. It basically takes the LAMBSE values from the ECM, compares it to the wideband's readings, and adjusts the actual flow values in the MAF transfer table, so that the car will be running at what it actually THINKS its running at.

Its some really cool stuff, definitly WELL worth the $130 for the software
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 09:49 PM   #14
MADMAC
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 1994 GT
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 193
Default

Adder, thanks for the reply. Sounds like it won't be to bad to setup. It is good to know that there is someone here that has first hand experience with QH and It will be great to be able to tune it out myself. I will be picking your brain more in the near future. Got the web site in my favorites now!! MAC
__________________
94 GT, BBK cer. L/T headers, O/F "H" pipes, Typhoon intake, 65mm Throttle body, Griffin 2 core radiator, FMS 3.73, carbon fiber clutches 31 spline axles, Alum. Drive shaft, Center Force Dual Friction Clutch, Energy Motor/trans mounts. Ret. Navy
MADMAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 09:57 PM   #15
94StinkinLincoln
5th Gear Member
 
94StinkinLincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang gt
Location: louisiana
Posts: 2,726
Send a message via Yahoo to 94StinkinLincoln
Default

I have a tweecer r/t and know someone who tunes with the QH on a daily basis.
If i could do it over again, i would own a QH.
They use the same software, plug into the pcm the same way, but the QH has a built in protection from getting fried, unlike the tweecer. The QH will also have some more perks down the line.
__________________
95gt, 331, canfield 195's, canfield efi intake; efi spyder elbow, ci cam, 90mm accufab TB, 1 3/4 accufab LT's, 3in accufab h pipe, 3in magnapacks, 4.30's, solid bushing rear upper/lower team z suspension, team z tubular k member and A arms, front coil overs with strange 10 way all the way around. currently aode; going to tko600.

For Sale:
aode,clutches,modified VB,3500 stall,28oz or stock flexplate, any thing needed for swap.
$1600 for trans, converter, and flex plate.
94StinkinLincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:03 PM   #16
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,856
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

the guys on www.eectuning.org will be of great help as well.

also remember that if you use the software I linked above, you can send me your tune (the .bin file) and datalogs of your car running, and I can suggest changes to your tune to help you out, based on what your datalog says.

It doesnt look like you have a very extensive mods list, so your tuning should be fairly quick. but make sure you get a wideband setup, as the benefits of having it are great... in many ways!
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:10 PM   #17
MADMAC
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 1994 GT
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 193
Default

Good to know that Moates is on top of it. There is obviously a big need for this. Building an engine/car now a days is alot more technical than years back. I remember back in the 70's when Dodge came out with the POS Lean-Burn (Master Tech back then) I got really to involved with that system. Grew a brain real fast.
__________________
94 GT, BBK cer. L/T headers, O/F "H" pipes, Typhoon intake, 65mm Throttle body, Griffin 2 core radiator, FMS 3.73, carbon fiber clutches 31 spline axles, Alum. Drive shaft, Center Force Dual Friction Clutch, Energy Motor/trans mounts. Ret. Navy
MADMAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:28 PM   #18
MADMAC
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 1994 GT
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdderMk2 View Post
the guys on www.eectuning.org will be of great help as well.

also remember that if you use the software I linked above, you can send me your tune (the .bin file) and datalogs of your car running, and I can suggest changes to your tune to help you out, based on what your datalog says.

It doesnt look like you have a very extensive mods list, so your tuning should be fairly quick. but make sure you get a wideband setup, as the benefits of having it are great... in many ways!
Wide band and gages on the list also for the near future. Getting all the supporting mods first, before going deep and drop in an engine. Looking at trying a Procharger out maybe before doing an engine. Descisions!!!! I want to get to know the innner workings of the tune first for sure.
__________________
94 GT, BBK cer. L/T headers, O/F "H" pipes, Typhoon intake, 65mm Throttle body, Griffin 2 core radiator, FMS 3.73, carbon fiber clutches 31 spline axles, Alum. Drive shaft, Center Force Dual Friction Clutch, Energy Motor/trans mounts. Ret. Navy
MADMAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:30 PM   #19
94StinkinLincoln
5th Gear Member
 
94StinkinLincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang gt
Location: louisiana
Posts: 2,726
Send a message via Yahoo to 94StinkinLincoln
Default

http://tunexchange.mustang-tech.org/
__________________
95gt, 331, canfield 195's, canfield efi intake; efi spyder elbow, ci cam, 90mm accufab TB, 1 3/4 accufab LT's, 3in accufab h pipe, 3in magnapacks, 4.30's, solid bushing rear upper/lower team z suspension, team z tubular k member and A arms, front coil overs with strange 10 way all the way around. currently aode; going to tko600.

For Sale:
aode,clutches,modified VB,3500 stall,28oz or stock flexplate, any thing needed for swap.
$1600 for trans, converter, and flex plate.
94StinkinLincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:34 PM   #20
vristang
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 1990 Gt & 1987 LX
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrimDrip View Post
I here the new Moates Quarter horse is better than both. The same people or person that designed TweeCar designed the software that is needed for the Quarter horse. It will also save a few dollars over the TweeCar.
This isn't accurate...

The tweecer (both hardware and software) was developed by a guy named Mike? Can't remember the last name.

The QuarterHorse was developed by Craig Moates. Craig has developed tons of tuning setups for many vehicles...

The software most often used with the QuarterHorse is Binary Editor, which was developed out of necessity (in reaction to the crappy software that came from tweecer), by a fellow Mustang enthusiast named Clint Garrity.
As Adder has stated several times.... Clint has done an excellent job both developing and supporting BE & EA.

Adder, I never thought you would have converted....
__________________
Seattle area enthusiasts should contact me via pm!

1990 GT - 408w - Rebuilding

Pull Your Trouble Codes -
vristang is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
50, anderson, base, curve, horse, learning, moates, pms, quarter, quarterhorse, rt, sale, tuning, turbo, tweecer, tweecerrt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company