The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2009, 11:42 AM   #1
1slick88cat
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 1988 mercury cougar
Location: Ny
Posts: 55
Default Tweecer rt or Anderson pms

What do you think and what are the disadvantages of both
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
1slick88cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 11:51 AM   #2
TrimDrip
4th Gear Member
 
TrimDrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 93, ford, mustang lx
Location: al
Posts: 1,104
Default

I here the new Moates Quarter horse is better than both. The same people or person that designed TweeCar designed the software that is needed for the Quarter horse. It will also save a few dollars over the TweeCar.
TrimDrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 07:54 PM   #3
Liquid_02
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Vehicle: 92 GT
Location:
Posts: 1,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrimDrip View Post
I here the new Moates Quarter horse is better than both. The same people or person that designed TweeCar designed the software that is needed for the Quarter horse. It will also save a few dollars over the TweeCar.
+1 on quarter horse. I have the PMS in my car and I love it, absolute only dis-advantage to the PMS I've found so far is the cost. If I did it again I'd probably use quarter horse.
Liquid_02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 11:49 PM   #4
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,856
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

I have the quarterhorse. Ive used the Tweecer, and it will NEVER go in my car again.

and theres no F'ing way that im paying for a PMS, especially when the quarterhorse does MORE stuff
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:15 AM   #5
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,111
Default

i have the pms and its very easy to use. if i had to do it all over again, id probably go the ms route just because its so much cheaper. also, tuning with maf is expensive, especially if you change your combo and get bigger injectors
__________________


7.25 @ 95.17MPH with a 1.70 60' on street tires and low boost-untuned and never been on the dyno

TWIN TURBO!! Keep drooling, I'm spooling
luckythirteen13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 10:48 AM   #6
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,856
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luckythirteen13 View Post
i have the pms and its very easy to use. if i had to do it all over again, id probably go the ms route just because its so much cheaper. also, tuning with maf is expensive, especially if you change your combo and get bigger injectors
The version 2.8 and newer of the MS2, use a ford maf. so if you were smart about the tuning, you would buy a maf that will work no matter what you change, like the SCT2800BA. and all you have to do is change your injector high and low slopes and breakpoint values.

your PMS might not let you do that, because its an overpriced piece of crap
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:28 PM   #7
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,111
Default

i think its geared towards people who know nothing about tuning because you dont need to know jack to tune with the pms. one nice thing is that it can tune based off of boost as well as when nitrous is spraying or not
__________________


7.25 @ 95.17MPH with a 1.70 60' on street tires and low boost-untuned and never been on the dyno

TWIN TURBO!! Keep drooling, I'm spooling
luckythirteen13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 03:31 PM   #8
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,856
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luckythirteen13 View Post
i think its geared towards people who know nothing about tuning because you dont need to know jack to tune with the pms. one nice thing is that it can tune based off of boost as well as when nitrous is spraying or not
merasquirt, even while running with a maf, can still referance boost through the normally included MAP sensor. and the MSnS firmware can be used to CONTROL your nitrous and boost levels.

and although the quarterhorse uses the stock eec, and realy doesnt use any extra inputs, a DATAQ can be used for nitrous trigger sensing, boost level, and even wideband input.

i actually have mine directly run into my stock harness, and datalogged along with all other sensor data that is recorded.

the moral of the story is... Anderson PMS is just as outdated as the ford letter cams, and just as over-rated as a tom hanks film
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 06:35 PM   #9
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 1995 Mustang GT, 2000 Mustang
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 12,828
Default

I had the PMS and sold it, didn't like it and it was a pain to tune with, layout was fairly easy, but the learning curve was huge. But I wasn't running version 2.8 either, I think it was 1. something back then.
__________________
Trinity 99 Mustang SVT Cobra
Selena 95 Mustang SVO GT-40 1.5L 11PSI Kenne Bell Supercharger
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 04:08 AM   #10
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Vehicle: unicycle
Location: United States
Posts: 3,386
Send a message via AIM to FoxGT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdderMk2 View Post
The version 2.8 and newer of the MS2, use a ford maf. so if you were smart about the tuning, you would buy a maf that will work no matter what you change, like the SCT2800BA. and all you have to do is change your injector high and low slopes and breakpoint values.
I've been running the 2.890 in an sd setup for quite a while on two different cars. I've installed & tuned 3 (one with just low rpm tune) using 2.8xx on a sd setup.

Never messed with quarterhorse & have only watched someone tune with a tweecer
__________________
If you have to ask what it takes to get to 500 HP, you don't have what it takes to get there.


'89 Mustang GT
'86 Mustang vert
'84 TT 351w notch
'89 Turbo Ranger
'96 Musta
FoxGT is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
50, anderson, base, curve, horse, learning, moates, pms, quarter, quarterhorse, rt, sale, tuning, turbo, tweecer, tweecerrt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company