You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</P>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</p>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's* 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's.* </p>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</P>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</P>
SHOW ME BITCH...The reason why the heads were redesigned was because they didn't take well to modifications......Show me a link were a completely stock 1987 and up GT rana f***ing 14.4...the 93 cobra didn't even post times like that...and for your information...I'm a very good f***ing driver...and i bet my stang would whip up on your ass any day of the week...</P>
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</P>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</P>
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</P>
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</p>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's* 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's.* </p>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</p>
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</p>
ok bitch, go look it up i gave the document where it came from.
and for your knowledge a 93 cobra went 13.75 @ 98.27mph shifting at 5500 and trap was made in third gear.
and again all facts come from The Offical FORD MUSTANG 5.0 technical reference & performance handbook
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</p>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's* 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's.* </p>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</p>
SHOW ME BITCH...The reason why the heads were redesigned was because they didn't take well to modifications......Show me a link were a completely stock 1987 and up GT ran*a f***ing 14.4...the 93 cobra didn't even post times like that...and for your information...I'm a very good f***ing driver...and i bet my stang would whip up on your ass any day of the week...</p>
yo homo dont call me what you call your boyfriend. I would look forward for you to bring your bitchass self over here to run me. and get the age right.
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</P>
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</P>
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</P>
ok bitch, go look it up i gave the document where it came from.
and for your knowledge a 93 cobra went 13.75 @ 98.27mph shifting at 5500 and trap was made in third gear.
and again all facts come from The Offical FORD MUSTANG 5.0 technical reference & performance handbook
</P>
Your such an idiot. If the f***ing cobra ran a 13.7...why wasn't it able to beat the LT1 Camaro....Your such a dumb f***...No one one here gonna believe that s**t..I'm about to post the race for your dumb ass...Fine someone else to argue with..because you picked the wrong mustang man to argue with..I know my history....learn yours...dumb ass.</P>
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
5.0 LX/GT
