The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2004, 05:13 PM   #21
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Send a message via AIM to Quik
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8



Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
</p>




low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's* 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's.* </p>


dude your so full of s**t. dont hate cause you cant drive worth a lick.
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph

these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook

and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
</p>



Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</p>

ok bitch, go look it up i gave the document where it came from.
and for your knowledge a 93 cobra went 13.75 @ 98.27mph shifting at 5500 and trap was made in third gear.

and again all facts come from The Offical FORD MUSTANG 5.0 technical reference & performance handbook
</p>


Your such an idiot.* If the f***ing cobra ran a 13.7...why wasn't it able to beat the LT1 Camaro....Your such a dumb f***...No one one here gonna believe that s**t..I'm about to post the race for your dumb ass...Fine someone else to argue with..because you picked the wrong mustang man to argue with..I know my history....learn yours...dumb ass.</p>
listen here, i got my facts from a proven published source. and yes the cobra did beat the LT1 of that year. you must not your history very well then. if you dont know these facts. Hell, you problaly think the 93 cobra only made 235hp<img border="0" src=smileys/smiley12.gif border="0">
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:19 PM   #22
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Send a message via AIM to Quik
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by pSicho

1982** Ford Mustang GT8.0N/A
1984** Ford Mustang SVO** 7.915.8
1985** Ford Mustang GT7.215.9
1987** Ford Mustang GT6.715.3
1988** Ford Mustang GT6.415.0
1990** Ford Mustang LX 5.06.414.9
1991** Ford Mustang GT7.315.6
1992** Ford Mustang LX 5.06.214.8
1993** Ford Mustang Cobra 5.914.5
1993** Ford Mustang GT(auto)8.016.1
1994** Ford Mustang Cobra 6.915.3
1994** Ford Mustang GT6.715.1
1995** Ford Mustang 3.8** 9.917.3
</p>


There now shut up about the times already.</p>
where the hell are these facts from, theyre way off
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:30 PM   #23
DUB 6
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by pSicho


1982 Ford Mustang GT8.0N/A
1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.915.8
1985 Ford Mustang GT7.215.9
1987 Ford Mustang GT6.715.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT6.415.0
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.414.9
1991 Ford Mustang GT7.315.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.214.8
1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.914.5
1993 Ford Mustang GT(auto)8.016.1
1994 Ford Mustang Cobra 6.915.3
1994 Ford Mustang GT6.715.1
1995 Ford Mustang 3.8 9.917.3
</P>



There now shut up about the times already.</P>

where the hell are these facts from, theyre way off
</P>


There right on the money...Your the idiot that's way off....13.7 hell the 99 cobra doesn't even run those times...</P>
DUB 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:35 PM   #24
DUB 6
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by pSicho


1982 Ford Mustang GT8.0N/A
1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.915.8
1985 Ford Mustang GT7.215.9
1987 Ford Mustang GT6.715.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT6.415.0
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.414.9
1991 Ford Mustang GT7.315.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.214.8
1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.914.5
1993 Ford Mustang GT(auto)8.016.1
1994 Ford Mustang Cobra 6.915.3
1994 Ford Mustang GT6.715.1
1995 Ford Mustang 3.8 9.917.3
</P>



There now shut up about the times already.</P>

where the hell are these facts from, theyre way off
</P>


There right on the money...Your the idiot that's way off....13.7 hell the 99 cobra doesn't even run those times...</P>

</P>


Read bitch</P>


<FONT size=6>1993</FONT></P>
<CENTER>
<TABLE>
<T>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<CENTER>
<TABLE border=1>
<T>
<TR vAlign=top align=middle>
<TD><FONT size=3>1967</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1968</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1969</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1970</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1971</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1972</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1973</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1974</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1975</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1976</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1977</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1978</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1979</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1980</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1981</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1982</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1983</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1984</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1985</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1986</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1987</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1988</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1989</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1990</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1991</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1992</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1994</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1995</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1996</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1997</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3>1998</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><A href="http://www.geocit
DUB 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:37 PM   #25
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Send a message via AIM to Quik
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by pSicho


1982** Ford Mustang GT8.0N/A
1984** Ford Mustang SVO** 7.915.8
1985** Ford Mustang GT7.215.9
1987** Ford Mustang GT6.715.3
1988** Ford Mustang GT6.415.0
1990** Ford Mustang LX 5.06.414.9
1991** Ford Mustang GT7.315.6
1992** Ford Mustang LX 5.06.214.8
1993** Ford Mustang Cobra 5.914.5
1993** Ford Mustang GT(auto)8.016.1
1994** Ford Mustang Cobra 6.915.3
1994** Ford Mustang GT6.715.1
1995** Ford Mustang 3.8** 9.917.3
</p>



There now shut up about the times already.</p>

where the hell are these facts from, theyre way off
</p>


There right on the money...Your the idiot that's way off....13.7* hell the 99 cobra doesn't even run those times...</p>
you must not really know your facts then the 99 cobra had motor issues preventing it from performing like it should. the 99 GT had better times and numbers then the cobra of that year and the new edge body weighs in more then the fox body. i posted my source for this info. go look it up. if you dont believe me.
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:45 PM   #26
DUB 6
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Quote:
Originally Posted by pSicho



1982 Ford Mustang GT8.0N/A
1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.915.8
1985 Ford Mustang GT7.215.9
1987 Ford Mustang GT6.715.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT6.415.0
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.414.9
1991 Ford Mustang GT7.315.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.06.214.8
1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.914.5
1993 Ford Mustang GT(auto)8.016.1
1994 Ford Mustang Cobra 6.915.3
1994 Ford Mustang GT6.715.1
1995 Ford Mustang 3.8 9.917.3
</P>




There now shut up about the times already.</P>


where the hell are these facts from, theyre way off
</P>



There right on the money...Your the idiot that's way off....13.7 hell the 99 cobra doesn't even run those times...</P>

you must not really know your facts then the 99 cobra had motor issues preventing it from performing like it should. the 99 GT had better times and numbers then the cobra of that year and the new edge body weighs in more then the fox body. i posted my source for this info. go look it up. if you dont believe me.
</P>


Dude you aint telling me nothing i don't already know. Hell my mother used to work on the ford assembly line. She worked there for 30 years. I know all there is to know about mustangs. I know all about the problem the cobra's had producing 320 horsepower. That's why they didn't produce more than 200 of them in the year 2000.....They then decided to play it save in 2003 only rating the cobra at 390 when it has more..</P>
DUB 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:48 PM   #27
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Send a message via AIM to Quik
Default 5.0 LX/GT

i seen your facts and it shows that a v6 camaro could almost beat a GT of the same year. those are some bogus facts. i showed weight gears and with the cobra i showed shift points. and your 93 cobra speed is close to what i posted. dont you think that et could be improved one. car and driver testers arent always professional drivers and not beating on a car to get the most out of it.
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 05:56 PM   #28
DUB 6
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
Default 5.0 LX/GT



Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
i seen your facts and it shows that a v6 camaro could almost beat a GT of the same year. those are some bogus facts. i showed weight gears and with the cobra i showed shift points. and your 93 cobra speed is close to what i posted. dont you think that et could be improved one. car and driver testers arent always professional drivers and not beating on a car to get the most out of it.
</P>


man they don't powershift them....because they figure you wouldn't abuse your car like that...so they don't...those are accurate times. 1993 Cobra only had 240 horsepower...1993 Z28 had 275....and it was a bit lighter. The best time i've ever heard of for those years was in 1986. The GT ran a 0-60 in 6 seconds and 14.6 quarter mile time. 1987 GT ran an altitude correct 14.7 and it was quoted as the quickest run ever by a Mustang GT for those years 87-93and that year had Speed Density.</P><edited><editID>00banditv8</editID><editDate>38023.6230902778</editDate></edited>
DUB 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 06:23 PM   #29
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,392
Send a message via AIM to mkspeed26 Send a message via Yahoo to mkspeed26
Default 5.0 LX/GT

the new 2005 gt will have 300 hp and go 0-60 in 5.5 seconds! cant wait!
__________________
1989 ford mustang lx (project car)
1993 dodge dakota sport (junkyard truck/dd)
my car domain page- http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/639767

mkspeed26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 06:24 PM   #30
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Send a message via AIM to Quik
Default 5.0 LX/GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00banditv8

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
i seen your facts and it shows that a v6 camaro could almost beat a GT of the same year. those are some bogus facts. i showed weight gears and with the cobra i showed shift points. and your 93 cobra speed is close to what i posted. dont you think that et could be improved one. car and driver testers arent always professional drivers and not beating on a car to get the most out of it.
</p>


man they don't powershift them....because they figure you wouldn't abuse your car like that...so they don't...those are accurate times.* 1993 Cobra only had 240 horsepower...1993 Z28 had 275....and it was a bit lighter.* The best time i've ever heard of for those years was in 1986.* The GT ran a 0-60 in 6 seconds and 14.6 quarter mile time.* 1987 GT ran an altitude correct 14.7 and it was quoted as the quickest run ever by a Mustang GT for those years 87-93*and that year had Speed Density.</p>
you said it yourself they dont beat the rides to get the best time. those times are what your average driver are capable of gettting. and if you only think a GT40 engine makes 240hp 15hp more then a 5.0HO. then your mistaken. for 1993, ford downrated its 5liter hov8 combination by 20hp [from 225 to 205] without actually making any contributing mechanical changes to the engine itself. All the factors discussed in chapter 15 relating to the downrating of 5liter ho v8 also apply to the 1993 gt40 ized cobra powerplant. by 1993 new appraisal, the cobra v8 rating worked out t o235 hp, or 30 more than the rating assigned to the standard 5 liter ho v8. these conservative numbers were delegated despite the fact that the same gt40 parts assembled on a an o0ther wise oe5liter engine had already produced 270hp in a well publicized nonfactory evaluation.

this is just some of the info of the gt40 motor
__________________
powershifting owns....
o yea if your car doesent break ur not driving it like u should
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company