5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

MAC vs. FLOWMASTER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2006, 04:19 AM
  #81  
ikeybmg
5th Gear Member
 
ikeybmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southwest VA.
Posts: 3,915
Default RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER

im thinking about trying a set of SLP's and a pro chamber. wonder how it would sound?
ORIGINAL: PRO50SC


ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT

They are but they are played out for a reason.... I TOTALLY understand what you are saying about everyone and their grandmother having flowmasters on their mustang but they all have them for a reason....

What do you have pro?
SLP! I spare no expence!
ikeybmg is offline  
Old 06-16-2006, 05:03 AM
  #82  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER

ORIGINAL: ikeybmg

im thinking about trying a set of SLP's and a pro chamber. wonder how it would sound?
ORIGINAL: PRO50SC


ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT

They are but they are played out for a reason.... I TOTALLY understand what you are saying about everyone and their grandmother having flowmasters on their mustang but they all have them for a reason....

What do you have pro?
SLP! I spare no expence!
i was wondering the same thing, i need something with less/none interior resonance!
OnyxCobra is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vrooom
4.6L General Discussion
13
02-21-2016 05:25 PM
1996cobraconvertible
SVT Forums
13
01-07-2016 04:50 AM
SSG Steggy
3.7L V6 Technical Discussions
2
11-05-2015 03:09 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM



Quick Reply: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.