5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Putting 351 heads on a 302.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2007, 02:03 AM
  #1  
Evil_F
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Evil_F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 880
Default Putting 351 heads on a 302.

I was thinking about putting some E7TE heads on my car. I found a set from a 351. I was reading that they have a larger head bolt hole on the 351 heads. Isnt there something you can buy that will fill up the gap in the head bolt holes. Or will an E7TE head be the same as an E7TE head off of a 302.
Evil_F is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:07 AM
  #2  
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alton, New Hampshire
Posts: 2,518
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

ORIGINAL: Evil_F

I was thinking about putting some E7TE heads on my car. I found a set from a 351. I was reading that they have a larger head bolt hole on the 351 heads. Isnt there something you can buy that will fill up the gap in the head bolt holes. Or will an E7TE head be the same as an E7TE head off of a 302.
yes they are the same, not worth the swap. if you want 351 heads look for some D0OE heads or some C9OE heads.
frdmstng1986GT is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:14 AM
  #3  
Evil_F
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Evil_F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 880
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

I read that the E7TE's were better than a lot of OE heads. With smaller chambers and so fourth. Though the ones you mentioned I see used 1.84 valves.
Evil_F is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:20 AM
  #4  
thunderjet429
2nd Gear Member
 
thunderjet429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 424
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

in my opinion the C90E or DOOE are better i amrunning a set with 1.94 valves and screw in studs till my dart pro1's are finished.. edelbrock makes a bushing for putting the 351 heads on a 302..
thunderjet429 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:20 AM
  #5  
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alton, New Hampshire
Posts: 2,518
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

ORIGINAL: Evil_F

I read that the E7TE's were better than a lot of OE heads. With smaller chambers and so fourth. Though the ones you mentioned I see used 1.84 valves.
thats not true, the OE heads were bsicly what was used to design the gt-40 heads. as for chamber size, you can always mill the OE heads down to make the chambers smaller.
frdmstng1986GT is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:35 AM
  #6  
Evil_F
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Evil_F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 880
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

TY for the input on the Edlebrock Bushings, that us what I was needing to know. Plus TY on the heads up on those other heads. I will be considering those.
Evil_F is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 02:48 AM
  #7  
thunderjet429
2nd Gear Member
 
thunderjet429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 424
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

np
thunderjet429 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 12:12 PM
  #8  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

ok if those bushings are even .001 longer than the head is tall you'll have issues. make sure they arent. of even better, just use some grade 8 washers under the bolt heads. you guys gotta remember the heads are held in position by two dowel pins - they aren't going ANYWHERE.

guessing from you sig, you have an 88 which means you already have E7TE heads. there is no difference between the 302/351 E7TE's except the head bolt holes are drilled bigger on the 351's. the OE heads you are referring to as crap is the D8OE heads, which is what fox bodies had up until 85/86/87 when they changed castings. the D8OE heads are just like the E7's but with a larger chamber. they should FLOW the same though. the C9OE and D0OE 351w heads are very similar to the GT-40 heads in terms of flow and performance, you just gotta knock the bumps down in the exhaust ports. I have a set of the C9's on my 302 and they are nasty. the problem with these heads is if you find a unmolested pair they need hardened exhaust seats installed so you can run unleaded fuel. for the money, they arent worth doing up because GT-40s are found cheap enough and actually flow a *little* better.
my77stang is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 01:24 PM
  #9  
thunderjet429
2nd Gear Member
 
thunderjet429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 424
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

the bushing's will work fine... i have used them many times... they are a stepped washer arp also makes a kit 154-3605 many alluminum heads have the 351 size bolt holes and say to use that kit when putting on a 302... i would just go to the scrap yard and find an 96-97.5 explorer with gt40's or 97.5- 2000 with the gt40p's.
thunderjet429 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 01:25 PM
  #10  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: Putting 351 heads on a 302.

i would just go to the scrap yard and find an 96-97.5 explorer with gt40's or 97.5- 2000 with the gt40p's.
+1
my77stang is offline  


Quick Reply: Putting 351 heads on a 302.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.