long or short?
#2
long or short?
also what size pipeing would be best? and are the flowmaster 40's very loud? im looking for a semi quiet muffler plenty louder than stock but not so loud it is over poweing in the car.
is a high flow cat. worth it?
is a high flow cat. worth it?
#3
long or short?
Long tube equal length headers. They'll be more of a pain to install, but it's not like you install/uninstall them every month, so why not bite the bullet a bit and get more power out of the deal?
#4
long or short?
yep.....I agree, long tube equal length headers -- def. the way to go.</P>
I have flowmasters 40s with NO cats, it's definitely a low power grunt which is NOT over powering, I can either ride with the windows open or shut and the radio on low and still hear the radio clear with no problems.But theywill be louder than stock.</P>
ps. -- H pipe</P>
#6
long or short?
X pipe. Adk Gunner about how hard it is to install, he recently did a set on his 5.0.
Definately get an X pipe. The difference between an X pipe and an H pipe is this: one looks like an X, the other an H.
However, the X directs the exhaust flow more effeciently and effectively, as well as increasing the scavaging effect, which leads to more power.
Hot Rod did a test between X, H and open headers, and if I remember correctly, the X pipe made more/equal amount of power as the open headers.
Check out this Car Craft article, as I was unable to find the Hot Rod one, but this adressed the same issue:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/69238/index.html
I strongly dis-agree with their "loss of torque because of less backpressure" argument.....in fact I flat out say it's an old wives tale.
But, to sum up the dyno :
Open headers: 333hp/304 ft lbs
2.5" w/ H pipe:323hp/296 ft lbs
2.5"into 3" w/X pipe: 335 hp/302 ft lbs
The choice is pretty plain to me.
Definately get an X pipe. The difference between an X pipe and an H pipe is this: one looks like an X, the other an H.
However, the X directs the exhaust flow more effeciently and effectively, as well as increasing the scavaging effect, which leads to more power.
Hot Rod did a test between X, H and open headers, and if I remember correctly, the X pipe made more/equal amount of power as the open headers.
Check out this Car Craft article, as I was unable to find the Hot Rod one, but this adressed the same issue:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/69238/index.html
I strongly dis-agree with their "loss of torque because of less backpressure" argument.....in fact I flat out say it's an old wives tale.
But, to sum up the dyno :
Open headers: 333hp/304 ft lbs
2.5" w/ H pipe:323hp/296 ft lbs
2.5"into 3" w/X pipe: 335 hp/302 ft lbs
The choice is pretty plain to me.
#7
long or short?
oh hell yeah, if you already have the X-pipe definitely keep it....I would rather have an X.</P>
you know, if you actually think about the design and how the exhaust flows in pulses which create a vaccum for the next set of pulses....an X pipe wouldbe the logical choice. -- smooth flow, no 90deg. turns like in the H.....</P>
hec, if it was up to me, the headers would go into the collector and then straight out...no mufflers, cats, no turns....just straight back out (if stuff weren't in the way i mean) (differential...etc...)</P>
#8
long or short?
I've heard of ground clearance issues with the long tube headers. And seeing as how my h-pipe was all kinds of caved in where the end of the long tubes would have been, I'm going to have to say for a street machine get shorty equal length. It's much cheaper and easier to replace a $120 H pipe than it is to replace a set of headers should you bottom out going over a bump.
#10
long or short?
The bend where the H pipe goes horizontal after dropping down from the header was about 1/2 as big around as it used to be. I don't know what suspension parts are on my car (bought it that way) but it's slightly lowered and the springs are pretty darned firm.