5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2007, 12:06 AM
  #1  
telsonman
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
telsonman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast GA
Posts: 617
Default FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

ok, i got a xe270 that i paid $250 plus for. i work for ford and was wondering if i should just order a FRPP cam, but i've heard such bad things about them. i can get them for around $120 i think, and i could return the xe and save money. i'm just trying to see if i should put my money into them if they are "so bad".
telsonman is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 12:17 AM
  #2  
bds95stang
2nd Gear Member
 
bds95stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 270
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

not bad...just old technology
bds95stang is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 12:18 AM
  #3  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

keep what you have
my77stang is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 12:32 AM
  #4  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

ORIGINAL: bds95stang

not bad...just old technology
I am old tech......Ford is old tech....pushrod engines is old tech.....does that make it bad?.....(I know....2 out of 3 ain't bad).......

FRPP cams = Crane cams (most of them)........I do suggest to degree them and you'll find out.....I did!......
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 12:34 AM
  #5  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

its not that a ford cam is a crane or not or whatever (quality is top notch either way), its the grind profiles. the ford cams are single pattern, low tech design. getting into something dual pattern will help the exhaust side breathe better and you will make more power
my77stang is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 12:49 AM
  #6  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

ORIGINAL: my77stang

its not that a ford cam is a crane or not or whatever (quality is top notch either way), its the grind profiles. the ford cams are single pattern, low tech design. getting into something dual pattern will help the exhaust side breathe better and you will make more power
[sm=trust_me.gif] ....quality IS an issue, like I said, I found out. Now.....getting into the Ford = dual pattern always favoring the exhaust, everything else is old tech case.......isn't that the same as saying that a single pattern cam with a split rocker ratios setup (1.6 Intake/1.7 exhaust) could do the job?.......

Why did Ford Engineers favored the intake when they redesigned the "speed density" roller cam from a 266°/266° duration to a "mass air" 276°/266° duration cam?.......instead of a 266°/276° duration cam?..
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 01:11 AM
  #7  
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: las vegas, nv
Posts: 9,092
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

its not that they are bad cams. they were great cams at one time. technology has changed and there are better cams to choose from now
luckythirteen13 is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 01:50 AM
  #8  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

i meant quality isnt an issue when comparing crane and frpp - they are both going to be a quality product in terms of metallurgy
my77stang is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 02:11 AM
  #9  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

Within the limitations of SADI cores.....yup.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 05:37 AM
  #10  
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
mrbigshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 845
Default RE: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!

most frpp cams are designed with low lift figures so they can be used with stock pistons, heads etc.

dont bother running one, most people buy e303's beacuse they have a slightly choppy idle. you can get the same sound with more lift from a modern cam and make more power.

i am not a fan of crane cams. i seen one fail in under75 miles in my buddys 351c, after 6 months of back and forth crane agreeded to pony up for a new motor. block, crank, heads etc. after they got the cam back they said it much have been cracked durring manufacturing and was not noticable.

its good they finally took care of him but he lost his numbers matching motor from his 70 mach1. he got stuck with all the machine work, and half the cost of the block. they said they would allow up to $175 for a block, the best he found was $350.
mrbigshot is offline  


Quick Reply: FRPP cams really that bad?!?!?!?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.