5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

85 or 92 stang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2007, 06:08 PM
  #1  
phenomenal_thunder
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
phenomenal_thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 115
Default 85 or 92 stang?

Right now I have a 2003 Ford Lightning but I am going to have to sell because of money problems and I am looking at these 2 years of mustangs. I am just wanting your opinions on both of these years. I know the 85 had a carb and the 92 is EFI but I am not for sure on the reliablity of each and which would be better for modding. If someone can give me some info on these 2 years that would be great. Also if you have any links to some sites where I can read all about these 2 mustangs that would be great. Thanks a lot everyone.


Tyler
phenomenal_thunder is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:11 PM
  #2  
86 5.0L
6th Gear Member
 
86 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

they are the same, only thing about the 85 is the weak read end which will implode sooner then later
86 5.0L is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:12 PM
  #3  
PJB
5th Gear Member
 
PJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, NY
Posts: 3,333
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

Id rather have EFI than a carb but thats just my preference.
PJB is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:29 PM
  #4  
tmajikman
5th Gear Member
 
tmajikman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,594
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

92... Has efi, 8.8 rear end, better dash imo, stronger tranny I believe (WC T5).
tmajikman is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:33 PM
  #5  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

i prefer EFI, so id get the 92. plus i think the 92 looks better.
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:35 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

depends if you have emisssions ....I have an 85 and a 92...I'd take the 85 over the 92 because of uniqueness...not to may 4 eyed mustangs driving around and for modding if you don't want the hassel of the computer tuning that comes with an efi then go for the 85 and tuning will be quick easy and painless if you know how to tune carbs....and the idle issues sometimes associated with efi won't be a s prevelent with the carbed set up.
mjr46 is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:52 PM
  #7  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

ORIGINAL: mjr46

depends if you have emisssions ....I have an 85 and a 92...I'd take the 85 over the 92 because of uniqueness...not to may 4 eyed mustangs driving around and for modding if you don't want the hassel of the computer tuning that comes with an efi then go for the 85 and tuning will be quick easy and painless if you know how to tune carbs....and the idle issues sometimes associated with efi won't be a s prevelent with the carbed set up.
cold start up on a carb sucks though.
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:56 PM
  #8  
89coupe
1st Gear Member
 
89coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 68
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

i would go 92. they are more difficult to tune but the run better in all conditions. they look a lot better too
89coupe is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 08:02 PM
  #9  
ACE
4th Gear Member
 
ACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,213
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

Go for the four eye! Its lighter and looks better!!
ACE is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 08:15 PM
  #10  
wildsurfer92
3rd Gear Member
 
wildsurfer92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 846
Default RE: 85 or 92 stang?

Okay well now I have BOTH a 1985 mustang gt, and a 1992 mustang lx, both 5 liters, both 5-speeds, both are awesome! Now the 92 does start easier when its cold, where as the 85 takes a little while to warm up, but thats only when the temps really drop down..but thats really only when it gets down below like 40, so its really not that big of a deal.. I do find that the 85 is alot easier to tune, you can go from mild to wild just messing with the carb and what not. Now i had the 7.5 inch rear in the 85, and really had no problems with it, but i still swapped that out for an 8.8 inch rear which was a piece of cake. SO really it about the looks. personally i think the 85 front end looks alot meaner than the 92's, but thats just my opinion. lemme know if you wanna know anything else
wildsurfer92 is offline  


Quick Reply: 85 or 92 stang?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.