Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.
Sponsored by Weld Racing


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


3.73 Vs. 3.55

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2007, 01:25 AM   #1
sin_city_j
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Default 3.73 Vs. 3.55

I am a 1985 fox, which I plan on boring to a 347 stroker.

It is a DD, I occasionally do highway pulls, but I mainly just do short races on the road.

which gears would be best?

p.s. Sorry for the double post.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
sin_city_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 01:29 AM   #2
Waldo5.0
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 116
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

I'd go with 3.73 just becuase your going to stroke to 347 in the future. Might as well get those over the 3.55 to later find out that you want to change them out for 3.73 because you want to go faster.
__________________
Waldo5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 01:29 AM   #3
Cad T Bird 500
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 30
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

I think with the bigger 347 engine the 3.55 will do you just fine. They are also cheaper to find used on eBay. Just make sure you get real Ford gears to make for easy install.

TED
Cad T Bird 500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 01:30 AM   #4
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Vehicle: '95 Mustang Cobra
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Send a message via AIM to OnyxCobra
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

I usually lean towards the conservative side, I really like my 3.55s
__________________
CarDomain - OnyxCobra
OnyxCobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 02:13 AM   #5
Baddog
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,604
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

Quote:
ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra

I usually lean towards the conservative side, I really like my 3.55s
I'm with this bro. People always say you have toride inyour specificcarwith both to decide. They'll also say there's not that much SOTP difference. But if you care about top end 3.55's offer the best of both worlds IMHO...
Baddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 09:31 AM   #6
86_GT_Mustang
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Vehicle: 86 Mustang GT
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 2,632
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

yea im going 3.55's
__________________

00 f150 128k 4x4 5.4
86 5.0 T-top
454ci club- member #4
98 SVT contour sold
86_GT_Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 10:03 AM   #7
OneFastEclipse
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to OneFastEclipse
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

As of right now, I went with 3.73s and to me it's not enough. I think with my current mods I would have been happier with 3.90s or 4.10s. We'll see how I feel about the 3.73s after my build goes on this winter.
__________________
1994 Mustang GT - 455rwhp 446rwtq
1999 GSX - 11.09 @ 135mph Sold!

Yes, I owned a Eclipse. Get over it.
OneFastEclipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 10:41 AM   #8
19stang86
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 110
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

i just put 3.73s and it really woke the car up. it doesn't seemlike goingfrom 3.27 to 3.73 would be a whole lot different but it is. i can only imagine what it would be like going 4.?? something. but the down fall is jumping on the highway. i stay at 3k-3300 rpm just going with traffic, it aint bad but........hey its worth it.
__________________
Sold both stangs got another 86 with t tops, 3.73's, Mac long tubes, no cats, flows Crane Ign. cobra intake. 16* timing other than that stockede.. stock. stock. 72,000 ORGINAL miles! I think I have walked more miles
19stang86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 12:07 PM   #9
blk40th
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,174
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

i think i have 3:73 in there now cuz i tach up when im on the highway, but the rear is clankin n being replaced this weekend with a complete rear that has 3:55's in it. now my car will be a turd, but it should be nice on the highway.
blk40th is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 01:31 PM   #10
19stang86
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 110
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

ya it should be alittle better around 250-350 rpm less on the f/w
__________________
Sold both stangs got another 86 with t tops, 3.73's, Mac long tubes, no cats, flows Crane Ign. cobra intake. 16* timing other than that stockede.. stock. stock. 72,000 ORGINAL miles! I think I have walked more miles
19stang86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2007, 10:36 PM   #11
347 VCI
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 12
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

definitely 3.73...besides the difference in gas consumption will be negligible.
__________________
92 lx notchback 347 c.i stroker, Patriot 185cc heads, Edelbrock rpm intake, edelbrock 70mm TB, e303 cam, 75mm Pro-m mass airflow meter, Accel 30lbs injectors, Msd full ignition kit, 2-1/2 BBk h-pipe with shorty headers, magnaflow, bbk cold air intake etc
347 VCI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 03:06 PM   #12
vtecwho
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 668
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

once you get around 300hp with 3.73s your just going to spin if you keep street tires on. i have 355s and with 265 hp i cant even do a accelerate wide open from 10mph with out spinning.

3.73 are great if your gonna run slicks or you have an all bolt on mustang that does not have the power to break them loose as easily. i would go with 355s. they still are great for acceleration and you will beable to build more HP with your car without spinning as easy.
__________________
(
DART 331, AFR 185s, NX274HR cam, Eddelbrock performer II, 42#injec, Z3X ECU, twEECer, VORTECH v-1, 10psi
vtecwho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 05:12 PM   #13
URLACHER54
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 328
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

i have 3.73s and though i really like them i am craving the 4.10s
__________________
1987 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe (SOLD)

1985 Ford Mustang GT Full Exhaust, 3.73's (SOLD)

1988 Ford Mustang GT automatic, hypertech chip, BBK shorty headers, Pypes O/R X pipe, Flowmasters, B&M shift kit, B&M 2000 stall, cold air intake, 70mm MAF, 3.73 gears, 3G alt, Aluminum radiator, hi flow water pump (SOLD)

1994 Ford Bronco XLT

2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0, Brembo Brake Package, 3.73's (On Order)
URLACHER54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 05:17 PM   #14
5.0 85 GT
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 888
Default RE: 3.73 Vs. 3.55

i too have 3:73's on street tires with about 240 hp(crank) i hope i have that much..any ways i cant pull hard out of first barely out of secodn caus ei just spin...so id say 3:55's because u will build ur motor up and u wont need the gears to tach up your car..thje motor will eb able to do it..and ulls ave a little fuel..go with 3 55's
__________________

Big Snake, Little Bite...Full Bolt-On 97 Cobra, Bored .30 over...Need Kenne Bell
-1986 IROC-Z-SOLD
-1985 GT T-Top-SOLD
-1994 GT-SOLD
-2002 GT-SOLD
-1997 COBRA-LOVE!!
-1988 Mercury Cougar Bostonian, 5.0 60k Mile Peach
-1985 GT-Carb'd Special, Bolt on's and a t-5 n Sunroof!
-1993 Ford F-150 4.9I6 5 Speed-WON'T DIE
5.0 85 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 05:17 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1996, 327, 355, 373, 46, 50, 99, automatic, bell, cougar, gear, gt, kenne, mercury, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WHICH GEAR TO PUT IN MY 05 GT? 3.73 OR 3.90 OR 4.10 1BADD05 2005 - 2014 Mustangs 58 08-12-2009 04:32 AM
3.73 vs. 4.10 pthurm_28 V6 S197 General Discussion 20 07-26-2008 08:46 PM
0-60 mph times with 3.73 vs. 3.31 gears? alvinator 4.6L V8 Technical Discussions 10 04-23-2008 09:27 AM

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup