E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
#1
E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
I have a 93 LX with pedestal mount AFR 165's and an E-cam. I am currently running 1.6 roller rockers. The power drops off at about 5200. My question is if I keep the E-cam and get some 1.7 rockers, will I be able to rev to 6500? I did the math and the lift with an E-303 and 1.7 rockers would be about .532. Am I better off keeping the E cam, or swapping to an F-303, with .512 lift? Also, what about piston to valve clearance? I think the combustion chambers on the heads are 58cc.
[/align]
#2
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
1.7 rockers shouldn't change your RPM band. I believe revs come from duration and rockers don't change duration. Overall I'd say you'd be better off going to a dual pattern cam.
#4
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
if your e cam falls flat at that range....Id suspect a valvetrain issue?? when you put the e-cam in did you install the correct springs or have the afr heads springs tested and compared to required spec?? anyway I like the f-cam in my 92 and I shift at right around 6200 rpms according to the tac in 1st and 2nd and around 5800 in 3rd
#5
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
ORIGINAL: mjr46
if your e cam falls flat at that range....Id suspect a valvetrain issue?? when you put the e-cam in did you install the correct springs or have the afr heads springs tested and compared to required spec?? anyway I like the f-cam in my 92 and I shift at right around 6200 rpms according to the tac in 1st and 2nd and around 5800 in 3rd
if your e cam falls flat at that range....Id suspect a valvetrain issue?? when you put the e-cam in did you install the correct springs or have the afr heads springs tested and compared to required spec?? anyway I like the f-cam in my 92 and I shift at right around 6200 rpms according to the tac in 1st and 2nd and around 5800 in 3rd
yea wuts up w. the springs, e cam's should pull a little higher then that, is it installed straight up or what?
i think you need to look at the springs and how the cam is installed/degree'd
as for the f cam and 1.6s, and the e cam and 1.7s and PTV... we cant answer that for you, you need to check that yourself, each engine is gonna be differant, to some degree.
i also think IF you do a cam swap to get a dual pattern cam, not a letter cam, but now thats just opinion, fact is, letter cams do make power... but there is newer technology out there, that i think should be taken advantage of
i think right now you should dyno the car, and tell us if it looks like all hell breaks loose at 5200, right now i suspect valve train like mjr, i say you get what you have working good, and then go from there
#6
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
part of your rpm band comes from the duration of the cam. if your wanting to rev it some and stay hydraulic i would suggest looking into better cams than the lame *** alphabet cams.
#7
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
[/align]
[blockquote]
How about these two? Any other suggestions.
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft
[/align] [/blockquote]
#8
RE: E-303 w/ 1.7 rockers or F-303 w/ 1.6's?
Could it be my intake holding me back? I have the old style Edelbrock Performer, but I have a Professional Products Typhoon in the mail.
[/align]