5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

MAF to TB Size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2008, 06:56 AM
  #1  
5.0 MPG
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
5.0 MPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,933
Default MAF to TB Size

this is probably an easy question but which one should be bigger in mm? The MAF or the TB?
5.0 MPG is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:26 AM
  #2  
Mustangkiler
5th Gear Member
 
Mustangkiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,005
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

Maf, the bigger you go the more top end because your increasing volume and decreasing veloctiy and vice versa.
Mustangkiler is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 01:41 PM
  #3  
dudeboy
3rd Gear Member
 
dudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 551
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

ORIGINAL: Mustangkiler

Maf, the bigger you go the more top end because your increasing volume and decreasing veloctiy and vice versa.
[sm=signs006.gif]

The MAF and TB don't need velocity to work

Bigger is better.
Cost becomes an issue with going super big though...


The MAF should be a little larger than the TB.
You don't want the MAF to impact flow... that is the job of the TB.


jason
dudeboy is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 12:50 AM
  #4  
5spd GT
3rd Gear Member
 
5spd GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 798
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

It would be more ideal for the MAF to have a slightly larger area (aka. cross section), than the throttle body.

Judging by milimeters is not always 100% accurate. A 75mm MAF may flow less than a 70mm TB, and vice versa.
5spd GT is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 11:15 PM
  #5  
Mustangkiler
5th Gear Member
 
Mustangkiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,005
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

Ok dudeboy you have fun with your 90mm maf and 89mm tb on a stock motor and wonder why you lost all ya bottom end.
Mustangkiler is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 11:57 PM
  #6  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

maf, and don't go too big on all of it like most poeple or you WILL GO SLOWER

to give you an idea ? check out the racecar of livernois motorsports....it makes 2500 hp and they use a 100mmtb on it , so when you see 1/2 the street cars that wanna bump to an 80....they are killing themselves and being retarded

70-75mm maf, and 65 tb will cover you to about 400+ hp
nitrous_bob is offline  
Old 04-20-2008, 01:28 AM
  #7  
dudeboy
3rd Gear Member
 
dudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 551
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

ORIGINAL: Mustangkiler

Ok dudeboy you have fun with your 90mm maf and 89mm tb on a stock motor and wonder why you lost all ya bottom end.
I have no idea how to respond to that...


Please explain to me WHY velocity is needed at the MAF/TB.

My stance, which I will hold, is that an increase in velocity at a specific point in the intake, is a sign of a restriction.
The venturi of a carb uses velocity to create a pressure drop. Velocity here is a necessary evil.

Why create a restriction when it isn't needed?



Bob,
Most claims I have seen from folks trying larger MAF/TB.... have shown they go faster....
Be carefulcomparing a 2500hp motor to our street 302/351w's....



How does a restriction create more power?
How does a restriction increase VE?

jason
dudeboy is offline  
Old 04-20-2008, 01:49 AM
  #8  
Bobert
3rd Gear Member
 
Bobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 717
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

ORIGINAL: dudeboy

ORIGINAL: Mustangkiler

Maf, the bigger you go the more top end because your increasing volume and decreasing veloctiy and vice versa.
[sm=signs006.gif]

The MAF and TB don't need velocity to work

Bigger is better.
Cost becomes an issue with going super big though...


The MAF should be a little larger than the TB.
You don't want the MAF to impact flow... that is the job of the TB.


jason
Well said,.
Bobert is offline  
Old 04-20-2008, 02:46 AM
  #9  
93StreetFox
2nd Gear Member
 
93StreetFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 216
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

i run a 76mm maf and a 70mm tbody, im happy with the setup.
93StreetFox is offline  
Old 04-20-2008, 09:42 AM
  #10  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default RE: MAF to TB Size

ORIGINAL: dudeboy


1) Why create a restriction when it isn't needed?


2) Bob,
MostCLAIMS I have seen from folks trying larger MAF/TB.... have shown they go faster....
Be carefulcomparing a 2500hp motor to our street 302/351w's....


jason
i don't how i got pulled into this...but

1) i don't see it as a restriction first off, if you don't NEED the air, it doesn't do anything unless it's packed in (like a blower/turbo)


2)and most of the claims i see are guys w/ stock heads and cam, who put an intake on and say they run 12's w/ thier 3.55 gears and street tires, so claims don't mean $hit , i have yet to see it happen personally and i have played this for a while now , i bought my first 5.0 in 1990.

as far as comparing it was to make a point. "x" amount of air is needed to make "x" amount of hp , and it goes up exponentially as you gain hp. if 100mm tb works on a car making 2500, how big is needed on a 300 hp street car ?

barring all other restrictions, yes you'll go faster, but to elimintae those other restrictions means swapping out the heads and intake. your not dealing w/ a stock car anymore now.

and like i said... all it needs is a 75/65 and it's fine, show me a car that went faster when the conditions were the same using bigger. you won't be able to
nitrous_bob is offline  


Quick Reply: MAF to TB Size



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.