5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Trick Flow or Edelbrock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2009, 11:02 AM
  #1  
barney50
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
barney50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53
Default Trick Flow or Edelbrock?

Which intake should I go with? The Trick Flow Steet Heat Or the Edelbrock RPM? I am going to be running the car on the street but will be running at the track some too.

He are the specs of my car:

Stock Shortblock
Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads
Vortech S-Trim
42lb Injectors
5 speed
373 gears
barney50 is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 11:23 AM
  #2  
Slo5oh
Banned
 
Slo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 1,206
Default

Edelbrock RPM Airgap. JMHO

Last edited by Slo5oh; 01-20-2009 at 11:25 AM.
Slo5oh is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 11:44 AM
  #3  
PJC Racing
3rd Gear Member
 
PJC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 836
Default

Originally Posted by Slo5oh
Edelbrock RPM Airgap. JMHO
The air gap is a dual plane carbed intake, thats not going to work well with his throttle body and injectors. WTF are you thinking?

I personally like the Holley II for a traditional EFI intake, but a spider would be real choice.

Last edited by PJC Racing; 01-20-2009 at 11:59 AM.
PJC Racing is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 12:25 PM
  #4  
91lx50udlose
2nd Gear Member
 
91lx50udlose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 172
Default

dont go with the tfs steet heat it will be a restriction with your set up personally i wouldnt go with the edelbrock rpm either
go with the holley or the rpm 2 both are more money than the ones you are looking at but on your engine there will be a big horsepower difference between them!
91lx50udlose is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 12:28 PM
  #5  
91lx50udlose
2nd Gear Member
 
91lx50udlose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 172
Default

a few months ago mm&ff did an article on their stolen goods 93 cobra with a n/a 347 they took off a tfs track heat and replaced it with an edelbrock rpm 2 and gained significant power look it up it will convince you to spend the extra money especially with a vortech coming into play
91lx50udlose is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 02:52 PM
  #6  
Slo5oh
Banned
 
Slo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by PJC Racing
The air gap is a dual plane carbed intake, thats not going to work well with his throttle body and injectors. WTF are you thinking?

I personally like the Holley II for a traditional EFI intake, but a spider would be real choice.
I suppose you dont know how to do anything but look at a catalogue and flip to 5.0 and order parts.
Slo5oh is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 03:00 PM
  #7  
94Yellow50
4th Gear Member
 
94Yellow50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,120
Default

no where in his post did he say anything about switching to carb tho..so suggesting a carb intake wasnt the best choise..i too would second the holley.. its a nice flowing piece, and is good on supercharged motors..my buddy runs one on his 92 306..and made just short of 400hp to wheels..N/A
94Yellow50 is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 03:03 PM
  #8  
Slo5oh
Banned
 
Slo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by 94Yellow50
no where in his post did he say anything about switching to carb tho..so suggesting a carb intake wasnt the best choise..i too would second the holley.. its a nice flowing piece, and is good on supercharged motors..my buddy runs one on his 92 306..and made just short of 400hp to wheels..N/A
Dude you are all idiots. You can keep your fi and have that. Do I have to do all the thinking for you? Elbo, drill out the nitrous bosses, get an adapter for the fuel rail hold downs.....done.

I doubt you even know what you mean when you say "its a nice flowing piece" and "good on supercharged motors" What does that even mean? Generic rhetoric does not convey confidence.

Last edited by Slo5oh; 01-20-2009 at 03:21 PM.
Slo5oh is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 03:27 PM
  #9  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

Originally Posted by Slo5oh
Dude you are all idiots. You can keep your fi and have that. Do I have to do all the thinking for you? Elbo, drill out the nitrous bosses, get an adapter for the fuel rail hold downs.....done.

I doubt you even know what you mean when you say "its a nice flowing piece" and "good on supercharged motors" What does that even mean? Generic rhetoric does not convey confidence.
stop being arrogant and explain yourself next time so others don't chime in and tell you otherwise.
mjr46 is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 03:38 PM
  #10  
PJC Racing
3rd Gear Member
 
PJC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 836
Default

So tell us idiots why the RPM Air Gap is the way to go Professor.

Yeah that would be real smart to use a dual plain manifold for EFI, NOT. If you wanted to convert a carb intake it would be wise to use a single plain manifold (it doesn't have a huge air flow restictor) i.e. the spider.

The baffle in a dual plain manifold would typically cause a tuning issue because the air flow that the MAF measured would be interupted after the TB. Not only would this cause a rich condition in the cylinder it will decrease power. You savy?

So what angle did you drill out your nitous bosses for the injector (hint, hint)? Post up some pictures of your RPM Air Gap converted to a EFI. Lets see some of your great fabrication skills cheif.
PJC Racing is offline  


Quick Reply: Trick Flow or Edelbrock?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.