5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

80mm 96 lincoln MAF Sensor on a 95 5.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2009, 09:14 PM
  #31  
txjason1
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
txjason1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Carson~Running the streets~Colorado
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by AdderMk2
^^^ wow.... dont get all butt-hurt just because your base model with a v8 is slow
well if I can get to the point of transferring all the power to the ground very low 12's will be easy. also considering that was teh only 2 passes I have ever made in the car or against the lights, I would say its pretty good. mad...never. I just get sick of lame 1 liners.
txjason1 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 09:24 PM
  #32  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default

Originally Posted by txjason1
YEAH FLAP YOUR LIPS ONYX....stock BFG G Force Zero's smoking well from 60ft to 80 ft and that was my fastest of the only 2 (two) passes the car has EVER made at the track. so when i want your opinion.....
regardless of traction issues your trap speed should be MUCH higher, we have stock mustangs on here trapping 101mph. You should be trapping at least 110 it seems like...
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:08 PM
  #33  
Nav50
1st Gear Member
 
Nav50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 77
Default

Listen Gi-Joe, Chill your jets. You're not going to get any help from anyone the way you're acting. You're supposed to be in the military? Dude, I'm stationed over in Japan 6500 miles away from my wife and my car and I don't act like you do. You need to grow up some.
Nav50 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:31 PM
  #34  
Slo5oh
Banned
 
Slo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by OnyxCobra

Also, if you honestly think you're making 360whp and trapping 101 in the 1/4 mile then that's the funniest thing I've ever heard. If that's all the faster you're running then there's something seriously wrong, and its probably with your brain...
LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOL OLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLL OLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL

Thats good for maybe 300 crank horse if you are hooking, 250 if you are spinning.

GL getting low 12s from hooking up. You'll probably see .3 Thats about it.

But all your numbers dont match anything so I doubt anything has a shred of truth in it.

BTW. What was your timeslip (all numbers) from your 13.1 @ 101 run. At the very least throw a 60 out there; mr. mycarissopowerfulthaticanspin****tytiresatthetrack .
Slo5oh is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:32 PM
  #35  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default

wow i have to agree with the benjamin franklin comment. txjason your question was answered you got butthurt get over it. this thread is done if you have any questions PM me
w8less is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
mrtrodonet
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
09-19-2020 03:12 PM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Dathan
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
10-05-2015 05:52 AM



Quick Reply: 80mm 96 lincoln MAF Sensor on a 95 5.0?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.