5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

87-93 Tanny Fitment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2009, 10:01 AM
  #1  
amdoming5
Thread Starter
 
amdoming5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 32
Default 87-93 Tanny Fitment?

I have an 87 5.0 gt. My transmission went out and I am trying to find a nice used one. My questions is, can I just replace it with any 87-93 from a V8 or is it 87-88 specific or..? Do I need to get the info off of the tag or is that just if I wanted to get a rebuild kit. Thanks your help is really appreciated
amdoming5 is offline  
Old 05-01-2009, 10:40 AM
  #2  
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
OneGearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 5,867
Default

they werent year specific, but they were 4-cyl and 8-cyl specific due to the extra torque of the V8. find an '87-'93 T5 out of a 5.0 and you should be fine. '94 and '95 had different input shafts than the Fox body ones. anybody wanna confirm this JUST in case im wrong about something......
OneGearhead is offline  
Old 05-01-2009, 12:52 PM
  #3  
1988TTOP
4th Gear Member
 
1988TTOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nw ohio
Posts: 1,556
Default

87-93 mustang with a 5.0l will fit right in a 94-95 mustang trans the the input shaft is longer i have heard that if u take the bell housing off the 94-95 that it will work also u can use a trans out of a 87-93 mustang 4cyl u have to change the pilot bearing though
1988TTOP is offline  
Old 05-01-2009, 08:28 PM
  #4  
j-wigg
2nd Gear Member
 
j-wigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 237
Default

i had a 4cyl t5 that burnt up on me within the first 45 min of driving it. the guy i bought the car from probably just through something together so who knows if the t5 was even any good. not sure about using the bell housing from a 94-95 with a t5 from a 94-95 to work but i know the input shaft can be changed from those to match up right for 87-93 with the stock bellhousing. check the tag and run the info against the specs so you know what your getting, not to say that exactly whats inside but a good possibility. also can check the gear ratio with the tag info.
j-wigg is offline  
Old 05-01-2009, 08:48 PM
  #5  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

85-93 will work fine = wc t-5's
mjr46 is offline  
Old 05-02-2009, 08:03 AM
  #6  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

94/95's will not work on a fox without changing the input shaft, if you were to use the 94/95 bell the shifter would come thru the floor about 2-3 inches farther back, not good.
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 05-02-2009, 10:50 AM
  #7  
j-wigg
2nd Gear Member
 
j-wigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 237
Default

if a 94/95 bell were to be used doesnt the driveshaft need to be shorter also. stock would be too long. i wouldnt mind my shifter being a few inches back.
j-wigg is offline  
Old 05-02-2009, 12:18 PM
  #8  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

You should be fine with the same driveshaft. 79-04 use the same length. You should be fine. But then you have to wonder if there is enough adjustment in the trans crossmember. The double hump part is supposed to slide back and forth across the tubes on the ends. Most people weld them after getting everything in. I am not sure how they are from the factory. I don't recall anyone putting a 94+ t5 and bell in a fox but I'm sure you can make it work. You just might have to cut into the trans tunnel a little to clear and you most likly wont be able to use the trim around the shifter.
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 04:47 PM
  #9  
amdoming5
Thread Starter
 
amdoming5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 32
Default

Thanks guys, I'll probably stick to looking for an 85-93...and check the tag too!
amdoming5 is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 06:26 PM
  #10  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

Originally Posted by j-wigg
if a 94/95 bell were to be used doesnt the driveshaft need to be shorter also. stock would be too long. i wouldnt mind my shifter being a few inches back.
crossmember mod would have to take place I believe too.
mjr46 is offline  


Quick Reply: 87-93 Tanny Fitment?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.