Throttle Body/EGR Spacers - 65 70 75mm? - MustangForums.com


5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2009, 08:16 PM   #1
RoachLIVEinLA
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2
Exclamation Throttle Body/EGR Spacers - 65 70 75mm?

Whats the importance between these measurements? Im guessing these would be circumfrance of the opening, but whats the significance? Will a 75mm throttle body produce more HP than a 65? Or do you need to upgrade your intake manifolds or fuel injectors if you choose to go with a 75mm? Im hoping some can clear this up for me.
RoachLIVEinLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 08:23 PM   #2
NotchAbove
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 259
Default

The number (65,70,75) represents the opening of the throttle body. What you want to do is match the size that best suits your setup. Everyone you ask will have their own opinions on which is the best size, etc. Certain manifolds will require a larger TB to match the openings. Most guys with a 302 and mild upgrades run either a 65 or 70.
NotchAbove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 08:30 PM   #3
RoachLIVEinLA
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2
Default

Lets say I have plans to do some serious upgrading, however, I have the option of buying 75mm TB/egr spacer combo for cheap. Is it possible to run stock 302 with a 75mm tb/egr now until i have the heads/intake/fuel injs. upgraded or would it cause it to run lean?
RoachLIVEinLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 08:51 PM   #4
NotchAbove
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 259
Default

You can go with the 75mm on a stock engine. You will not run lean, as the TB does not affect the A/F ratio, it just allows air in. What it will do however is, since a 75 is larger than the engine needs you will lose some bottom end torque, as that larger of a TB will cause the air to move slowly. Keep in mind the stock is 55mm.
NotchAbove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 10:32 PM   #5
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotchAbove View Post
You can go with the 75mm on a stock engine. You will not run lean, as the TB does not affect the A/F ratio, it just allows air in. What it will do however is, since a 75 is larger than the engine needs you will lose some bottom end torque, as that larger of a TB will cause the air to move slowly. Keep in mind the stock is 55mm.
Nope.... it doesn't affect torque due to changes in the speed of the air through the intake. The TB, as mentioned, is simply an air stream valve accounted for by the MAF, which starts the fuel metering calculations, you would only need to increase the accelerator pump function in the ECM to compensate for a better intake pulse...... easily done in a speed density system as I confirmed with two stock '86 setups I had to install an 80mm TB.
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 10:38 PM   #6
NotchAbove
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0 View Post
Nope.... it doesn't affect torque due to changes in the speed of the air through the intake. The TB, as mentioned, is simply an air stream valve accounted for by the MAF, which starts the fuel metering calculations, you would only need to increase the accelerator pump function in the ECM to compensate for a better intake pulse...... easily done in a speed density system as I confirmed with two stock '86 setups I had to install an 80mm TB.
I saw you talk about this before Joel. So, then, why do they make different sizes ? Why don't we just all run a 90mm and call it a day ? Just asking.
NotchAbove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 11:01 PM   #7
AdderMk2
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

because people still believe that there is no need for such a large TB.

I ran a 70mm on my stock manifold. any bigger and it wouldnt have been beneficial. the opening on my intake wasnt going to take advantage of anything larger.

my new manifold however has a 75mm opening... so, my new TB... is 75mm
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 11:04 PM   #8
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Same reason the 331 is an option...... marketing..... nah!, as everything in this vice, it all depends on the whole combo. IOW.... you could also have a 70mm or 65mm TB perform within your goals, if the rest of the combo IS compatible. Same goes with the other components. For example..... if a 75mm TB is "HUGE" for a 302 CID engine with some performance mods, why does a Lincoln LS comes with a 82mm bore/70mm blade TB on a 240 CID engine from the factory?




Last edited by Joel5.0; 05-24-2009 at 11:07 PM.
Joel5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chassis wiggle when off throttle? UrS4 S197 Handling Section 10 10-03-2015 07:23 AM
4r70w torque converter q's guitarman376 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang 0 09-30-2015 06:54 PM
2 throttle cables? col2560 V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs 8 09-25-2015 07:51 AM
Really scary throttle issue, Bullitt tuning or something wrong here. JDWalton 4.6L V8 Technical Discussions 8 09-24-2015 09:47 PM
2007 mustang gt vs 2012 mustang v6 Webster454 2005-2014 Mustangs 1 09-07-2015 05:59 AM


Tags
2000, 50, 65, 70, 75, 75mm, body, bodyegr, mild, mm, mustang, run, spacer, stock, tb, throttle

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.