5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

5.0 question for a classic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2009, 07:38 PM
  #1  
opie_803
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
opie_803's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 190
Default 5.0 question for a classic

i have a 69 stang and am considering swapping a 5.0 into it due to the fuel injection and roller cam setup.

my question is, what years are best and what are the differences in the 5.0 H.O between the mustang - thunderbird and explorer? i know the explorer comes with a gt40 style intake.

i am currently running a 351c 4v with an aod and 3.55 tru-trac rearend. will i notice much of a difference in drivability and performance?

thanks for your help.
opie_803 is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 08:37 PM
  #2  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

I'd leave your car the way it is, but if you want a 5.0 in it.......89-92 are the best years = forged pistons and mass air, the explorer motors have slightly lower compresion and the heads are what you'd want off them
mjr46 is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:02 PM
  #3  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

If you already have a Cleveland you'd be WAY better of investing in some good C heads if you're willing to spend the money. Aussie 2V heads with smaller intake ports, or some CHI heads and a good cam would wake that thing WAY the hell up, to the tune of 150-200hp over stock. The 351C is a way stronger block than a stock 5.0 anyway. Just do a roller cam conversion.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:39 PM
  #4  
opie_803
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
opie_803's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 190
Default

i recently went through the motor and put a stronger cam in it. i may have gone too strong thou. the bottom end is not the best. before the stall was installed, it didnt want to spin the tires over.

cam specs... intake .310 @cam valve .536 lift
exhaust .325 @cam valve .562 lift

advertised duration @ .005 lift in. 290 ex. 300
@ .50 in. 224 ex. 234

rpm range is 2000 - 4800ish


this is for a flat tappet / hydraulic cam. looking back i wish i had done a roller conversion but money was an issue.

are my heads hurting me? they are the 4v open chamber.
opie_803 is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:45 PM
  #5  
opie_803
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
opie_803's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 190
Default

sorry for the double posting... i tried to delete the post in the general discussion but couldn't.
opie_803 is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:48 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

no worry I took care of it........for the 351c , if you could find the 4v closed chamber heads, they'd be the ones you'd want, not the open
mjr46 is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 06:41 AM
  #7  
92tealcp
1st Gear Member
 
92tealcp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Exton Pa.
Posts: 76
Default heads

Just to throw one out there, if you look at some used Nascar sites you might be able to find an old set of C heads from them that have a crap load of work done and have all the best parts $$$ can buy. We built one for our restored 69 351C Torino Winston Cup car and found the heads at a shop in NC, 2K for a set of complete heads.
92tealcp is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 02:23 PM
  #8  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

4V heads aren't going to make jack for bottom end in stock form, unless they're on a stroker. They don't make velocity at low rpm. That's why you need better heads. With that cam if you put something like CHI 3V heads on it, you'd make wild torque everywhere and would barely be able to keep the tires planted on the street.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 06:57 PM
  #9  
opie_803
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
opie_803's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 190
Default

thanks for the reply guys. i have checked the prices on the chi heads and think i will have to wait awhile on them since i have just built the motor. my particular cleveland has the 4-bolt mains also. i guess i was thinking of the convience of fuel injection and other bolt on mods that can be done with the 5.0.

i will keep my ear out for some closed chamber heads also.
thanks again.
opie_803 is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 10:12 PM
  #10  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

built right, a 351 c with closed chamber heads is a 10.50's car all day long, seen plenty of them at the track
mjr46 is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 question for a classic



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.