5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

koeo results not right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2009, 09:21 PM
  #1  
pk222
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pk222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northern cali
Posts: 586
Default koeo results not right?

hey guys, I've been having problems with my 95 svt recently having problems starting. After going through 2 coils in 2 months I'd like to fix the problem instead of just trying to change random parts hoping it works. I had a code scanner hooked up and my car wouldn't allow the scanner to read anything. It would give it data but not a diagnostic. Also it was saying signal return was opening and closing when it should have just done one or the other(The person I had doing the test was a mechanic and told me thats all he could find out).
I figured I might as well try to do the self test with the jumper wire and see what I could get as codes out of the check engine light.
I think somethings wrong because the place I found out how to do this said since my car is a 95 it should be all 3 digit codes but these are what I got
1111
111
223
122
24
The second time I tried after it stopped flashing the cel I tried again and got
1111
111
112
171
56
then since It changed I tried a 4th time and again got different numbers again
1111
111
115
615
7

the only ones that stayed the same were the first 2 codes.
does this seem right to anyone or did I mess up while reading it? Also any ideas on why the code reader wouldn't read anything?

thanks in advance for any advise
I really have no knowledge in auto electronics. the furthest I usually go is stereos so sorry for being so lost on this
pk222 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:57 PM
  #2  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Need to redo the test, SN95 setups are 3-digit EEC systems... not 4, 3 and then 2. Check the video clips showing a sample of a KOEO in a SN95 at http://sbftech.com/index.php/topic,2471.0.html or check the clip described below.....

These are the results of a KOEO self-test using the CEL to read the flash patterns in a SN95 or the 3-digit codes pattern. If you watch, you'll see the following codes show up:

116 (OD codes first pass) - delay - 116 (OD codes second pass)

After those 2 sets, a 6 sec delay then 1 flash (= separator code 10) followed by another 6 second delay. Then the two passes corresponding to the CM codes:

181 - 189 - 211 - 212 - 543 - 556 - delay - 181 - 189 - 211 - 212 - 543 - 556

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kJr39MP73Y
LUK
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:00 PM
  #3  
84conversion50
2nd Gear Member
 
84conversion50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 451
Default

check your main grounds for corrosion
84conversion50 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:05 PM
  #4  
pk222
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pk222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northern cali
Posts: 586
Default

That is the site and video I went off of but I will try it again tomarrow and check the grounds. Could you think of why it would have changed each time?
pk222 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:48 PM
  #5  
84conversion50
2nd Gear Member
 
84conversion50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 451
Default

i think its throwing false codes from either bad connections,short, or faulty ecm
84conversion50 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:02 PM
  #6  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

Originally Posted by 84conversion50
i think its throwing false codes from either bad connections,short, or faulty ecm
especially with the mechanic saying a SIGRTN problem...which can also come back to a ICM
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:53 PM
  #7  
pk222
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pk222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northern cali
Posts: 586
Default

is there anyway I can check this or am I going to have to have a shop do this?

also by the ICM you meant the Ignition control module right? Could that be why I'm going through coils?
and also are there ways of having just the computer tested since I can't pull the codes with a scanner?
pk222 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 06:58 AM
  #8  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Focus on running the KOEO and getting the correct reading first...... could you make a video clip of the self test results just like the one shown? LUK
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 06:36 PM
  #9  
pk222
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pk222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northern cali
Posts: 586
Default

I just tried to make a video and it wont take videos longer than 17 seconds so I have to wait until tomarrow to get a new memory card. If I can find a camara I will post the video sooner

Last edited by pk222; 06-25-2009 at 07:40 PM.
pk222 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 10:11 PM
  #10  
pk222
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pk222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northern cali
Posts: 586
Default

I found a camera.
I don't know how to post it straight to here but heres the direct link
also should the radiator fan be turning on before the test starts?
http://s275.photobucket.com/albums/j...rrent=koeo.flv

Last edited by pk222; 06-25-2009 at 10:13 PM.
pk222 is offline  


Quick Reply: koeo results not right?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.