5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Which harmonic balancer for my 1989 5.0 GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2014, 01:05 AM
  #1  
5.0sicness
Thread Starter
 
5.0sicness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nevada
Posts: 28
Default Which harmonic balancer for my 1989 5.0 GT?

Hello again friends I was laying under my car the other day replacing the clutch cable when I noticed some rubber hanging out of my harmonic balancer... Obvisaly this is not good and I am going to replace it, however I want a better quality balancer with out breaking the bank... As I'm looking at different web sites I see different styles and weights. My 1989 GT hatchback is basically stock with a few bolt in parts so I don't need a full race version but what weight should I go with and what are the differences... I do plan on a lot more upgrades down the road leading to a lot more power so would like one that I won't have to replace again as the power gets higher if possible. Thank you for any and all info you have.
5.0sicness is offline  
Old 07-10-2014, 07:27 AM
  #2  
88 orangepeel notch
6th Gear Member
 
88 orangepeel notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,061
Default

On another well known forum, a well known poster recommended this one.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/pi...view/make/ford
88 orangepeel notch is offline  
Old 07-10-2014, 09:07 AM
  #3  
5.0sicness
Thread Starter
 
5.0sicness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nevada
Posts: 28
Default

Do you by chance have a link to the thread? I'm really looking for more info on the differences in weight...
5.0sicness is offline  
Old 07-10-2014, 09:37 AM
  #4  
Boss_Hotrod
5th Gear Member
 
Boss_Hotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,166
Default

The weight has the do with the engine's balance. Stock 89 5.0 roller is 50oz. The 28oz. is for 351 and some strokers and 0oz is for internal balanced engines. As far as actual weight goes unless you have a race engine you dont need to worry about that much. A lighter than stock one wont show anything on a stock engine.
Boss_Hotrod is offline  
Old 07-10-2014, 01:45 PM
  #5  
5.0sicness
Thread Starter
 
5.0sicness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nevada
Posts: 28
Default

Ok so basically I can run any balancer I want... My main concern was if I put to heavy or light of a balancer it would rob hp or damage something. Thank you very much
5.0sicness is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 09:39 AM
  #6  
Boss_Hotrod
5th Gear Member
 
Boss_Hotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,166
Default

Physical weight yes. Kinda a waste or money on a stock motor to put anything other than a stock one on though. You just have to have the correct imbalance though.
Boss_Hotrod is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 10:53 PM
  #7  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

any 302 before 1982 uses a 28 oz balancer too fwiw....but yeah 50 oz like boss said
rmodel65 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
LivingInThePast
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
2
09-16-2015 12:20 PM



Quick Reply: Which harmonic balancer for my 1989 5.0 GT?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.