5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Is my MPG too good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2014, 07:26 PM
  #11  
uedlose
5th Gear Member
 
uedlose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charles Town WV
Posts: 2,288
Default

we use to get 20 all the time when the car was near stock. as long as we didnt run the crap out of it.
uedlose is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 06:14 AM
  #12  
yurizx6r
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
yurizx6r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 632
Default

Well that's good to know. I just wanted to make sure because the only foxbody guys that I know of around me have turbos in it, and I'm not there yet. Besides that, my best friend has a 91 Eagle Talon tsi (AWD turbo), so to say he knows much about foxbodys is a stretch. He helped me build this car, but certain things like this of course he would not know.
yurizx6r is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 08:20 AM
  #13  
88 orangepeel notch
6th Gear Member
 
88 orangepeel notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,061
Default

When I first got my notch, with the mods in my sig, and still had the AOD, I got a best of 28 hwy. That was corrected mpg because my speedo was off a little of from the gears, according to the GPS. Now with the T5, I can only manage 24-25 hwy. My car is in tune, and my wideband shows it's about the same ratios your pulling. I'm a touch leaner than you at WOT with 13.0.

Driving technique is "moderate" with some "old fart" mixed in there.
88 orangepeel notch is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 08:54 AM
  #14  
yurizx6r
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
yurizx6r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 632
Default

That is really good to know. I feel a lot better. I didn't think I was running lean or anything like that. I realize it's a 21 year old V8, but I didn't think with the condition of the motor and the weight of the car it was that crazy to get 20MPG's. When I first got the car I was getting 13-15 because the computer was bad and the motor needed a good clean and tune up. What did surprise me a little was even after the Trick Flow manifold it didn't really go down at all. I'm curious to see how much it goes down if and when I put Trick Flow or AFR heads in though........ any thoughts or experience?
yurizx6r is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 09:41 AM
  #15  
88 orangepeel notch
6th Gear Member
 
88 orangepeel notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,061
Default

I've never dealt with aftermarket heads, but anytime you make an engine more efficient, mpg can only go up. Keep us informed on how it turns out.
88 orangepeel notch is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 07:12 PM
  #16  
reldla1996
2nd Gear Member
 
reldla1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
Default

When I put TF TW heads (and cobra intake) on my 89, my gas mileage went up by about 1 mpg. 1.7 rockers had earlier cost me about 1 mpg, so in the end I came out even.
reldla1996 is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 07:57 PM
  #17  
JPJP
1st Gear Member
 
JPJP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 115
Default

I am getting around 19 MPG w/ the same 3.08:1 rear as you have w/ every day driving. It is supercharged . Yes, I get on it once in a while too. I have hit over 20 with my daily commute but haven't yet this year.
JPJP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
mungodrums
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
10-07-2015 04:01 AM
algregory
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
4
09-11-2015 11:44 AM
Sparks_88
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
09-08-2015 01:06 PM



Quick Reply: Is my MPG too good?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.