Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Sponsored by Weld Racing


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2014, 06:24 PM   #1
mustangsrus
 
mustangsrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Vehicle: 1985 mustang gt hatchback
Location: ontario
Posts: 4
Default looking to upgrade a stock 1985 mustang gt

I have a 1985 mustang gt hatchback with a 302 stock everything. the only thing ive done so far is put a k&n air filter and put bbk shorty headers with a offroad h pipe dual hump cross member with flowmaster exhaust. Im looking for some more horsepower but with about a 5000$ budget. the car has 116kms on it and has been well taken care of. what would be the most bang for my buck.

ive never owned a mustang before so im new
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20140530_203624.jpg (32.7 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 20140530_203646.jpg (32.2 KB, 3 views)
mustangsrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 06:40 PM   #2
65Raven65
3rd Gear Member

 
65Raven65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2010 GT
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 663
Default

That's a nice sized budget.

Heads, cam, intake, and a good carb is where I'd start. Throw in a 3.73 gear and you'll have a nice running beginning for your first Mustang!

Congrats!
__________________


2010 GT, 5-speed manual, 3.73
1987 T-Top GT, 5-speed manual, 3.08
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 06:52 PM   #3
mustangsrus
 
mustangsrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Vehicle: 1985 mustang gt hatchback
Location: ontario
Posts: 4
Default

any certain brands or sizes you would recommend?
mustangsrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 07:09 PM   #4
65Raven65
3rd Gear Member

 
65Raven65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2010 GT
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 663
Default

Some of the carb guys here on the site would probably know better.

I know back in the day when my friends had carbed foxbodies, a lot of them used Dart heads and Victor Jr. intakes, and Holley 750s, but these cars were making some big HP. (for the time at least)

I'm fuel injected, when I finally do heads and intake I'm going with Trick Flow for both.
__________________


2010 GT, 5-speed manual, 3.73
1987 T-Top GT, 5-speed manual, 3.08
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 08:40 PM   #5
mustangsrus
 
mustangsrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Vehicle: 1985 mustang gt hatchback
Location: ontario
Posts: 4
Default

great thx. do u think putting sub frame braces on would be a good idea. and I was also thinking of an aluminum driveshaft or do u think that's a waist of money?
mustangsrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 09:06 PM   #6
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member

 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang GT
Location: Jersey
Posts: 10,246
ItsUrFuneral
Default

The stock drive shaft is fine. That's always something you can upgrade down the road if you still have the mod bug. With a 5 grand budget you should have a pretty stout running fox when your done. Trick flow offers a top end kit that's makes 360HP for $2800. Throw in a grand worth of exhaust and a few suspension mods along with some decent gears and you'll have a pretty quick car.
__________________
ENGINE363 fully forged dart engine on the way with more spray!TRANNY C4 with trans brake, 3800 stall, 9in. raceconverter, hurst shifter REAR Moser 35 spline kit with spool, FRPP 3.73 gearsSUSPENION UPR pro street Uppers & lower control arms, Strange 10 way dampers, coilovers up front, BBK sub frame connectors, UPR Tube K-member & A-arms10.57@123.9 (OLD 5.0)
2011 CamaroSS 12.34@110.92









bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 11:12 PM   #7
UPRSharad
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Vehicle: 2011, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: FL
Posts: 2,271
www.facebook.com/sraldiris
Default

IIRC, 85 5.0s had a 7.5" rear end. A junkyard 8.8" would be a nice upgrade. Then a budget HCI package and of course, Suspension & Tire upgrades. If you shop around, this can all be done on a budget and you'll end up with a nice cruiser.
UPRSharad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2014, 07:20 AM   #8
88 orangepeel notch
4th Gear Member
 
88 orangepeel notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Vehicle: 1988 notchback
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,655
Default

Welcome to the forum. With that kind of money, you'll be set with a very nice Fox. I'd start be just digging around in this forum with the "search", type in anything you want to know about. It's all been covered before, what works, what doesn't. You'll be reading for days and getting a good education on modding. I personally would start with a set of gears for the rear. Best bang for the buck there is on these cars. Good luck and keep us updated.

Edit: but as Sharad said, swap in an 8.8, don't use the 7.5 that's in there now.
__________________
306 with all bolt ons, letter cam, ported E7's, T5 swap, full exhaust, 3:55's, 2" drop, and the worst paint you'll ever see or feel.
Dyno'd 300/316, 2745lbs-track scale
Best ET………12.4@108, 1.66 60ft on 8" ET Drags.
24 mpg (combined)
88 orangepeel notch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2014, 03:48 PM   #9
65Raven65
3rd Gear Member

 
65Raven65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2010 GT
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangsrus View Post
great thx. do u think putting sub frame braces on would be a good idea. and I was also thinking of an aluminum driveshaft or do u think that's a waist of money?
I think the general consensus around here is that sub frame connectors are a good idea no matter what.

I'm putting them on mine, not really because I'm making a lot of HP, but my '87 is a T-Top car, so I imagine it's more susceptible to flex.

As far as the aluminum driveshaft, I don't have one on my '87 yet, but I had one on my '89 GT and it was by far one of the best mods I ever did. It knocked out vibrations that I didn't even realize I had. The car felt like a new car afterwards. I'll be putting one on my '87 but it's fairly low on the priority list right now.
__________________


2010 GT, 5-speed manual, 3.73
1987 T-Top GT, 5-speed manual, 3.08
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2014, 03:48 PM   #10
65Raven65
3rd Gear Member

 
65Raven65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2010 GT
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPRSharad View Post
IIRC, 85 5.0s had a 7.5" rear end.
Interesting, I didn't know that.
__________________


2010 GT, 5-speed manual, 3.73
1987 T-Top GT, 5-speed manual, 3.08
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2014, 03:48 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup