1fastzook

Hi does anyone other than me run a bbk ssi intake manifold on their 5.0?

[IMG]local://upfiles/29615/4367FED6A5DD45DC8880F85F4596FA89.jpg[/IMG]

md66948

How do you like it? I am trying to locate 3rd party test report on the BBK SSI intake. Only test results I have read so far came from BBK. I am looking at the Performer II or the BBK SSI intakes for my 347 stroker. Right now I am leaning towards the Performer II.

Dane

1fastzook

its a decent intake its alot better than my gt40 if you find any tests on this intake let me know thanks

grabbem88

rpmII or victor 5.0

91lxstang

its def one of the best looking intakes...

waxyourboard

Reviews http://mustang50magazine.com/techart...8_0412_intake/ <---- That's the BBK SSI

http://mustang50magazine.com/techart...03_bbk_intake/ <----- BBK SSI-R

Comes with its own fuel rails etc, I would probably get it, except i'm not sure if it fits under a stock '94-'95 hood. It looks good, and with the SSI-R upper gives a possibility for a high-rpm screamer or power-adder

1BIGMOFO

i was going to run the bbk, the edelbrock performer 2 buts out better numbers for the same price, the only perk of the bbk is getting the fuel rails.. i love the performer 2 its great.. the look of the bbk is alot better, it all depends on what your looking for

razarr69

that is acutally a half decent looking manifold once it's on, looks like **** jus sittin there haha. i think i'd rather have a edelbrock perfomer 2 though or a trickflow.

1fastzook

here is some more pics i hope they sell the top half of that ssi-r i will get that too

[IMG]local://upfiles/29615/5527E06A8F09495C805FCCAF7F29506A.jpg[/IMG]

1fastzook

i had it on since dec 1st havent had no problems yet.

[IMG]local://upfiles/29615/374D3ABF9E704FAB802661DCB49ECF44.jpg[/IMG]