Max MPG Ford Fox Mustang V8 5.0 better gas miliage!
#31
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
I bet though if you really spend time with polishing stocker components and used compression and lift to get the HP then you would be more on the track than bigger heads and traditional hp makers. Exact tolerances with piston wall clearance and PTV clearances. dead nutz tuning with EFI...never gonna hear me say that much...just because you can get the variable stuff more effectively.
#32
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
ORIGINAL: LTnone
The short answer is you're never going to get 'great' mileage out of a fox...Sure you can do things like taller gears, etc. but it's never going to be 'great.'
The short answer is you're never going to get 'great' mileage out of a fox...Sure you can do things like taller gears, etc. but it's never going to be 'great.'
ORIGINAL: Hamutoff
just hoping to get "good" miliage out of pushrod sbf, maybe... not "great" but "better"?
just hoping to get "good" miliage out of pushrod sbf, maybe... not "great" but "better"?
#33
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
the only way to get good mileage is low rpm's and a lightweight vehicle, it doesn't matter what size the engine is either. i have a 95 dodge with a 488 ci engine and i manage 18 mpg daily driving and 15 mpg towing. my 89 lx coupe has 270 hp and always averages at least 23 mpg highway and 20 city with stock gears. My point is you can get awsome mileage in anything as long as you find a way to keep the revs down.
#34
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
Could I machine my 289 crank to fit the 5.0 block 1 piece rear seal?
get the lip ground off the back, then have a seal saver installed and it drops right in. people would never suspect you have a one piece roller 289
#35
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
Yeah bro's but if people always just settled for what was available think of what we would have missed. besides its like imagining what you would do if you won the lottery..lol. most of us wouldnt have access to the Tech to do this anyway.
#36
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
did any of you guys see the issue of 5.o mustang and superfords where the fox was getting 800 ponies and 20mpg highway with 3.73? maybe you could get some ideas off of that. if i remember correctly he has an auto tranny with overdrive...so that supports your idea of low revs on the highway.
#37
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
Your biggest concern is going to be making sure you don't spend so much doing the actual project that it becomes more expensive than the gains. Some of this stuff ain't cheap, unless you'll be driving it dd for a few years make sure you do the math.
PS gears will be a big one on that list, especially for highway driving. Find some stock 2.73's
PS gears will be a big one on that list, especially for highway driving. Find some stock 2.73's
#38
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
viper spec t56.... because of its .50 od
#39
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
Yup, LOW o/d is going to be necessary to get "good" mileage out of a V8 with decent power(by current standards). You want some power and good mileage, get a 4 banger and put a turbo on it.
#40
RE: $4 gas? HELP Design fuel efficient hot rod ford engine
I still hope that this thread might generate some combos or more suggestions of single parts/packages, but:
Nitrous will not *increase* mpg, nor will it detriment it.
we got funky ignitions and turbos....those are the high dollar parts so far ???
(well I was thinking turbo from the start, see combo #1)
Not intending to be RUDE but yes scartastic: YES here are all the HIGH dollar expensive stuff so mentioned
WOW actually everything turned up being dirt cheap or stuff that mostly folks dont want....
(excepting the funky ignitions and turbos already mentioned which are good ideas)
Additionally low rpm's are inherently cheap because the engine doesnt have to be built "to the hilt",
"to the bleeding edge", its not going to need constant tunining either
Lightweight veh, well this is in the selection
*note my three notchbacks anyone*
also you can remove stuff thats free.... however I wont forget light wieght parts, tubular k-member, use of aluminum,
also (here's the expensive stuff) super lightweight pistons, and conn rods...
Other than that folks have been saying gt40p heads stock cams 289 internal parts.... off the shelf cheep stuff
Im just saying that if somebody puts together a combo here that makes sense Ill build it!
For one idea, do you agree that turbos would be better in this application than for example the new paxton sc?
ORIGINAL: dimebag
i still say nitrous
i still say nitrous
we got funky ignitions and turbos....those are the high dollar parts so far ???
(well I was thinking turbo from the start, see combo #1)
biggest concern is going to be making sure you don't spend so much doing the actual project that it becomes more expensive than the gains. Some of this stuff ain't cheap
289 with ... a small well tuned carb
GT40P heads
E7's or E6's (heads)
low rpm's and a lightweight vehicle
(excepting the funky ignitions and turbos already mentioned which are good ideas)
Additionally low rpm's are inherently cheap because the engine doesnt have to be built "to the hilt",
"to the bleeding edge", its not going to need constant tunining either
Lightweight veh, well this is in the selection
*note my three notchbacks anyone*
also you can remove stuff thats free.... however I wont forget light wieght parts, tubular k-member, use of aluminum,
also (here's the expensive stuff) super lightweight pistons, and conn rods...
Other than that folks have been saying gt40p heads stock cams 289 internal parts.... off the shelf cheep stuff
Im just saying that if somebody puts together a combo here that makes sense Ill build it!
For one idea, do you agree that turbos would be better in this application than for example the new paxton sc?