The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang > 5.0L General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2009, 11:08 PM   #11
brianbooth
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 65
Location: Washington
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
You're really going to waste money on the van? Why not donate it and use the money that you were going to spend on cheap fox-body?
'Cause I love that van and I've already got a 65 mustang and a 94 MR2 turbo, so my sports car quota is full at the moment
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
brianbooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:38 AM   #12
mustangsneverdie
5th Gear Member
1985 Ford Mustang
 
mustangsneverdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Vehicle: 1991 mustang
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianbooth View Post
A little bit of googling has me thinking it's got a C6, so the E40D would be the natural upgrade for that. Not quite sure how to go about setting it up for electronic shifting but I'm guessing that pulling the shifter out of a junkyard would do the trick
if it has a c6 in it keep it it's one of the best (if not) that ford has put out
__________________

91 mustang 5.0 lx,306 shortblock,E-303 cam,ported and polished E7's,rebuilt stock T-5,bbk E/L shorty headers,with their 2 1/2" o/r H-pipes,70 mm maf,3G alt.,upr adj. upper c/a's 3:73 gears. race weight with driver:3260,only a 100 lbs. more than the 85

85 mustang: parts car for now

Best time 13.7@ 102 mph 2.074 60' on street tires(in the '85)
Best time 14.3@ 96 mph 2.13 60' on street tires(in the '91)
mustangsneverdie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 01:36 AM   #13
brianbooth
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 65
Location: Washington
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangsneverdie View Post
if it has a c6 in it keep it it's one of the best (if not) that ford has put out
Yeah, I've been trying to find threads on c6 to E40D conversions and all I can find are the other way around so I've been starting to get the idea that the C6 isn't my problem. A little looking around craigslist has a 351W for 4 or 5 hundred bucks so I'm thinking it's not worth my time to bother with the headgasket on the 302 with 150K and a previous owner who couldn't figure out how to change the oil and go with the engine swap instead.
brianbooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 02:58 AM   #14
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert 1 of 1001
Location: Pacific Beach, San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianbooth View Post
'Cause I love that van and I've already got a 65 mustang and a 94 MR2 turbo, so my sports car quota is full at the moment
So I take it that both cars are just how you want them? Why not invest some money in them? Seriously, do not waste your time or money on that thing. It will be slow no matter what you do.
__________________


For Sale:
17" x 8" Authentic Cobra R's

1983 Mustang GT Convertible 1 of 1001 '83 GT Vert's <-New Pics
2006 Mazda 3s Hatch
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 04:23 PM   #15
brianbooth
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 65
Location: Washington
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
So I take it that both cars are just how you want them? Why not invest some money in them? Seriously, do not waste your time or money on that thing. It will be slow no matter what you do.
My goal isn't really to make it fast. I just want to take my old van and make it a little more user-friendly since I've got to take the engine out to fix it anyway. I need to have it running since it's not like I can really carry anything bigger than groceries in the MR2 or the Mustang, so why not give it a little love if I'm going to have to do all this work anway?
brianbooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 07:48 PM   #16
q8stang
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2007 ford mustang gt
Location: wa seattle!!
Posts: 619
Default

ive seen this fast chevt van on pinks all out one time so this would be a nice idea to have the ultimate sleeper
__________________
2007 black GT<---- garage queen for now
PRO 5.0
C&L Racer
Brenspeed xcal2
Steeda cmdp
zex
steeda motor mounts
che torque limiters
meziere eh2o
msd cop(1 month and one died)
3.73 gears
306hp/316tq<--OLD

2006 quick silver GTO
LS2 6.0 Liter
6Speed
kooks axleback
drive it like i stole it
Daily driver

I claim no responsibility for any Personal or Property damage caused by my advice
q8stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 08:03 PM   #17
symonds86
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 1988 ford mustang GT
Location: New York
Posts: 706
Default

yeah and this one you could literally sleep in lol
__________________
symonds86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 12:38 AM   #18
q8stang
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2007 ford mustang gt
Location: wa seattle!!
Posts: 619
Default

^^
lmao
thats what a true sleeper should be
__________________
2007 black GT<---- garage queen for now
PRO 5.0
C&L Racer
Brenspeed xcal2
Steeda cmdp
zex
steeda motor mounts
che torque limiters
meziere eh2o
msd cop(1 month and one died)
3.73 gears
306hp/316tq<--OLD

2006 quick silver GTO
LS2 6.0 Liter
6Speed
kooks axleback
drive it like i stole it
Daily driver

I claim no responsibility for any Personal or Property damage caused by my advice
q8stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 09:10 AM   #19
5.0stanger
6th Gear Member
 
5.0stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Howard City, MI
Posts: 5,886
Default

I would guess just a little engine work to get it going again and them some lower gears in the rear would be the most noticable for the least amount of money.
__________________
-Kyle
5.0stanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 04:45 PM   #20
brianbooth
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 65
Location: Washington
Posts: 15
Default

Well a compression test has confirmed that not only is the head gasket toast, but it managed to blow a ring as well so the ole 302 is dead. I've got a local guy who's setting me up with a complete 351W for a good price so hopefully, a few cases of beer and weekends of cursing at the shop manual later, the van will live again. It comes with brackets, oil pan, and intake so I think I should be set after getting the exhaust lined up... although I'm not 100% sure that the unbalance is the same. More work for google I guess

Last edited by brianbooth; 04-22-2009 at 04:52 PM.
brianbooth is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1983, 302, 351w, 88, aod, brian, c6, craigslist, driveshaft, econoline, gear, gt, junkyard, lts, mustang, skips, swap

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company