You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
i'll let you know when it comes. when i get my rear suspension bought is when the car starts coming to together and it goes on a BIG diet. what do you think about the selection so far?
I think the thing will be moving in a hurry once you get a powerplant in it. Weight and suspension is about 75% of moving a car down the track.
Funny though that you're doing the opposite of me lol. I've got the 25% that is the motor covered and more lol, and the 75% that's the car is about as close to stock as it can get =D.
Should still be fast though lol...guess we'll have to see!
Cris
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
~These are just some of the drawbacks we...as guys who like to go mach 10 with our hair on fire and these little motors screaming at rpms that make other guys cry...have to deal with.~
LOL, you mean to say you're looking for 9's on pump gas??
With all it looks like you're doing with that car...my motor just might be able to pull it off!
=D
Cris
__________________
~These are just some of the drawbacks we...as guys who like to go mach 10 with our hair on fire and these little motors screaming at rpms that make other guys cry...have to deal with.~
im shooting for 2700 with me in the car. im probably losing close to 100lbs alone off the front with the k-member and brakes, not including some of the lighter items thats going on it. i think it will be close it and it wont have that gutted interior look either.
im shooting for 2700 with me in the car. im probably losing close to 100lbs alone off the front with the k-member and brakes, not including some of the lighter items thats going on it. i think it will be close it and it wont have that gutted interior look either.
My 82 was 2800/2850 or so with me in it. At the time I was 185lbs. I had the basic done for weight reduction...k member, race seats, sound deadener, aluminum heads...etc. I also had a cage in it as well. I went 10.70's@125 with a pump gas 347 back then with a crap assed 60'. If we put my current 347 motor in it, with the right supporting drivetrain...at 2700lbs lol, you bet your ass it'd run 9's =D.
Cris
__________________
~These are just some of the drawbacks we...as guys who like to go mach 10 with our hair on fire and these little motors screaming at rpms that make other guys cry...have to deal with.~
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
