Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang > 5.0L General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2009, 02:16 PM   #1
vagabond
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2004 Ford Mustang V6
Location: Ontario
Posts: 91
Default How much modification to get 300 - 350 hp out of a 88 GT?

As the topic states I am curious how much money would I be looking at to push 350 or so rwhp on a 5.0?

I would be doing the work myself. Avoiding Nitrous though, what mods would get me there?

Thanks
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
vagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 02:45 PM   #2
sgarrelts01
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang GT
Location: MI
Posts: 74
Default

Cam, heads, intake.

you can buy the trick flow kit for like 2400 that suppose to give you 350-360 depending package, but i think your block has to be bored to get that.

Good set of heads, with a good intake and cam would get you to 300.
sgarrelts01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 02:47 PM   #3
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member

 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 95 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,787
Default

A good H/C/I will net you around 300rwhp. A 331 or 347 with a good induction will give you 330-370rwhp. Bolton's plus a supercharger@8-10psi will give you 330-370rwhp. As for price, it all depends what route you want to go. But it won't be cheap.
__________________
95 Mustang GT: DSS SuperProBullet 331/ TFS heads, TFS-1 cam, GT-40 intake, AODE, Vortech@15psi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5XYPGj4sM&feature (pre stroker)
95 Mustang GTS: CHP 347(10:5:1) AFR 185's, Comp XE274HR, Cobra Intake 382rwhp/423rwtrq
NoGo95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 02:48 PM   #4
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member

 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 95 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgarrelts01 View Post
Cam, heads, intake.

you can buy the trick flow kit for like 2400 that suppose to give you 350-360 depending package, but i think your block has to be bored to get that.

Good set of heads, with a good intake and cam would get you to 300.
Trickflow overrates that at the flywheel. Many of their kits put down 270-290rwhp.
__________________
95 Mustang GT: DSS SuperProBullet 331/ TFS heads, TFS-1 cam, GT-40 intake, AODE, Vortech@15psi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5XYPGj4sM&feature (pre stroker)
95 Mustang GTS: CHP 347(10:5:1) AFR 185's, Comp XE274HR, Cobra Intake 382rwhp/423rwtrq
NoGo95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 03:05 PM   #5
sgarrelts01
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang GT
Location: MI
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoGo95GT View Post
Trickflow overrates that at the flywheel. Many of their kits put down 270-290rwhp.
I figured as much. I was reading the fine print and it says to get that hp your block needs to be a 306. Probably need the right pistons an so on.


I got a 331 stroker, an its very expensive and the f*ucker don't even run right lol. I have to drop another 800 for some crap to see if that will make it all better.
sgarrelts01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 04:45 PM   #6
vagabond
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2004 Ford Mustang V6
Location: Ontario
Posts: 91
Default

Thanks for the answers guys. I'm looking at 87-93 models right now, but should I also take 94-95 into consideration? I've always heard the 5.0's were the best/cheapest to mod when compared to the newer stuff (4.6 SOHC), so as far as the fox and sn95 are concerned, are there any huge differences besides the fox being ~75 lbs lighter?
vagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 04:49 PM   #7
Back-in-Black
1st Gear Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1989 Ford Mustang GT Vert.
Location: Florida
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
Thanks for the answers guys. I'm looking at 87-93 models right now, but should I also take 94-95 into consideration? I've always heard the 5.0's were the best/cheapest to mod when compared to the newer stuff (4.6 SOHC), so as far as the fox and sn95 are concerned, are there any huge differences besides the fox being ~75 lbs lighter?
Not much difference. You just need to figure out which body style you like more.
Back-in-Black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 05:00 PM   #8
vagabond
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2004 Ford Mustang V6
Location: Ontario
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Back-in-Black View Post
Not much difference. You just need to figure out which body style you like more.
So not much difference in suspension, rear end etc?

One won't handle more power without extra modification than the other?

Generally speaking, is one easier to work on than the other? Easier clearance to the undercarriage, better layout, etc etc?

I'm not worried about the looks per say, I think they're both nice cars, I just want to get a good starter. This will be the first 'project' car of mine.
vagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 05:09 PM   #9
AdderMk2
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 94 Cobra
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
So not much difference in suspension, rear end etc?

One won't handle more power without extra modification than the other?

Generally speaking, is one easier to work on than the other? Easier clearance to the undercarriage, better layout, etc etc?

I'm not worried about the looks per say, I think they're both nice cars, I just want to get a good starter. This will be the first 'project' car of mine.

the frame and suspension was virtually unchanged from 79-04... many use the same or similar parts. It ultimately comes down to which one you like better (looks)
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 06:26 PM   #10
5.0stang123
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 1990 mustang lx 5.0
Location: Courtenay B.C
Posts: 405
Default

Fox would be better for the easier to work on part. Foxes are lighter but the 94+have bettre brakes and suspension and are 5 lug.
__________________
5.0stang123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 06:26 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
300, 306, 350, 50, 5l, 87, 95, body, cats, fox, hci, horsepower, hp, mustang, supercharger

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Port/Polishing stock heads tonkpils555666sas GT S197 General Discussion 28 01-23-2008 08:33 PM

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup