5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Tuned 331 BBk Vs Systemax here are the numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2009, 05:55 PM
  #1  
grod297
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
grod297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 87
Default Tuned 331 BBk Vs Systemax here are the numbers

Okay so in answer to where has the torque gone on a built 331.

The bbk intake outperforms the systemax 2 in torque from 2900 RPM until 3200 RPM with the bbk producing 273 ft-lbs at 2900 vs the systemax producing 268 ft-lbs. At 3300 rpm the both produce 295 ft-lbs but that is where the competition ends. from that point on the systemax 2 climbs from 300 ft-lbs at 3400 RPM to a peak torque of 335 ft-lbs at 4400 RPM.

Max horse power from the BBK - RWHP - 293 at 5500 RPM
Max Horse power from Systemax 2 - RWHP 327 at 5800 RPM at 5500 RPM horse power was 324.

Well on the same engine heads ect. a 34 hp improvement just from changing the intake. and 9 ft-lbs improvment in torque.

The real question is will a 347 built similarly produce 400 ft-lbs at any rpm?

Any and all meaningful comments are welcome

G
grod297 is offline  
Old 10-28-2009, 06:08 PM
  #2  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

and to answer your question , I believe your lack of power output for the 331 lies in cam choice and heads......what heads and cam and exhaust do you have??? I have a 306 with a well put together combo putting out close to that

Last edited by mjr46; 10-28-2009 at 06:11 PM.
mjr46 is offline  
Old 10-29-2009, 01:08 AM
  #3  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default

why are your numbers so LOW?? thats a lot of money spent for only 327 rwhp
w8less is offline  
Old 10-29-2009, 08:23 AM
  #4  
FivePointOhh
in limbo
 
FivePointOhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,300
Default

Originally Posted by fs308
why are your numbers so LOW?? thats a lot of money spent for only 327 rwhp
plus juan
FivePointOhh is offline  
Old 10-30-2009, 09:43 PM
  #5  
grod297
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
grod297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by fs308
why are your numbers so LOW?? thats a lot of money spent for only 327 rwhp
Hell if I know but those are the numbers. Maybe if I click my heels and wish hard enough they will get better. Or maybe I need a better Cam and spring combo.

The car feels better than it did stock and pulls better longer; but I thought the same thing when I got the report. The problem is that I do not want a rough idle cam .. I prefer very smooth and I do not know if you can get that and power with a push rod motor N/A.

At any rate thanks for the observation (you are right it is a lot of money for low numbers
grod297 is offline  
Old 10-30-2009, 10:18 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

Originally Posted by grod297
. The problem is that I do not want a rough idle cam .. I prefer very smooth and I do not know if you can get that and power with a push rod motor N/A.

At any rate thanks for the observation (you are right it is a lot of money for low numbers
you can have a cam that'll perform and give a good idle, prob is OTS cams don't give you the best of both worlds, gotta go custom!! how does .550+ lift and under 220 on the duration for a good but noticable idle sound??? I'll have a sound clip tomorrow of such in my 89 vert thread.......www.flowtechinduction.com or www.camshaftinnovations.com can give you the best of both worlds, I use FTI and have 2 such custom cams in use........couldn't be happier.........what is the entire combo?? h/c/i??
mjr46 is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 12:12 AM
  #7  
94StinkinLincoln
5th Gear Member
 
94StinkinLincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 2,763
Default

i can not give an acct for FTI, but i have done business with CI and recomend them.
94StinkinLincoln is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 11:22 AM
  #8  
grod297
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
grod297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
you can have a cam that'll perform and give a good idle, prob is OTS cams don't give you the best of both worlds, gotta go custom!! how does .550+ lift and under 220 on the duration for a good but noticable idle sound??? I'll have a sound clip tomorrow of such in my 89 vert thread.......www.flowtechinduction.com or www.camshaftinnovations.com can give you the best of both worlds, I use FTI and have 2 such custom cams in use........couldn't be happier.........what is the entire combo?? h/c/i??
Heads afr 185
Cam -- Comp cam 35-518 -8 XR 274 Hyd Rollers
Intake Holley sytemax 2

Thanks

G
grod297 is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 11:34 AM
  #9  
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
ctgreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

I reccomend a custom from CI. I've got one of their cams with .6/.592 lift and a 114 lsa and she idles nice. not much of a lope at all, just barely more than stock. and my car made better numbers than that when it was untuned. however youre going to see very minimal gains over that if you switch to a 347 bottom end. I think what you need is a better cam.

also is this with an auto? if so that would help explain a lot.
ctgreddy is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 11:58 AM
  #10  
grod297
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
grod297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by ctgreddy
I reccomend a custom from CI. I've got one of their cams with .6/.592 lift and a 114 lsa and she idles nice. not much of a lope at all, just barely more than stock. and my car made better numbers than that when it was untuned. however youre going to see very minimal gains over that if you switch to a 347 bottom end. I think what you need is a better cam.

also is this with an auto? if so that would help explain a lot.
No this is a manual trans ( sad huh) The more I think about it a built 331 with 9:6:1 compression and forged internals -- A lot of money put in the wrong place I fear. Maybe I will put on a vortech and see what happens -problem is its a stock block and with the compression at 9:6:1 I wonder how musch boost I could run before the engine becomes a boat anchor.
grod297 is offline  


Quick Reply: Tuned 331 BBk Vs Systemax here are the numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 AM.