The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang > 5.0L General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2009, 03:26 AM   #21
9redfox3
1st Gear Member
1993 Ford Mustang
 
9redfox3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: 1993 mustang gt
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdderMk2 View Post
are you on fu cking crack? changing a valve cover gasket on a 94-95 requires the removal of only ONE additional part over the fox platform.

you are clearly NOT mechanically inclined.
I'm I on Crack? Who's talking about the gasket i'm talking about valve covers and the one inch spacer needed on the upper intake just to change them out.Also about more ammo? Ok how much more computer friendly the fox's are and 200lb less weight or so than sn95.If your so crazy on your 95 why is it for sale?Nothing but a money pit you have....Go wax your bald head!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Quote:
All Stock almost all Original new jasper crate engine 5.0,This Fox draws alot of attention!
9redfox3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:49 AM   #22
projectresto83
5th Gear Member
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 83 GLX, 93 LX, 98 sixer
Location: Indiana(Stationed in Texas)
Posts: 4,169
Default

Some people have reasons for having to sell there cars^. All of are cars are money pits if you think about it.
__________________

Off building sand castles in the middle east
projectresto83 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:09 AM   #23
BladeX10
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 1984.5 GT350
Location: California
Posts: 383
Default

Just alittle update since the thread has gone south =p

decided to change up the plans a bit. Going to keep the fox and sell the camaro and buy a 94-95 5.0 with it and use the rest of the money to get a cobra rear bumper and a paint job on the fox
__________________
1998 Mustang GT
1988 Mustang GT
1998 Camaro Z28

and i'm only 18!
BladeX10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:49 AM   #24
bluovalguy
3rd Gear Member
 
bluovalguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 05 GT 5 spd
Location: Seaside, OR
Posts: 743
Default

What do you mean gone south?? Everything is peachy here
__________________
It is better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6



05 GT 5 Spd Redfire

Steeda Pro Action Struts and springs, Steeda Tri Ax w/ cue ball, Steeda TBS, SLP Loud Mouths, Airaid intake, AM Blackout panel, 20" Foose Nitrous Wheels wrapped in Nitto 555's
bluovalguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 12:06 PM   #25
projectresto83
5th Gear Member
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 83 GLX, 93 LX, 98 sixer
Location: Indiana(Stationed in Texas)
Posts: 4,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BladeX10 View Post
Just alittle update since the thread has gone south =p

decided to change up the plans a bit. Going to keep the fox and sell the camaro and buy a 94-95 5.0 with it and use the rest of the money to get a cobra rear bumper and a paint job on the fox
That sounds like a better plan. Why have the bow tie in the mix anyway?
__________________

Off building sand castles in the middle east
projectresto83 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:15 PM   #26
BladeX10
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 1984.5 GT350
Location: California
Posts: 383
Default

I bought the camaro due to the 300RWHP stock and came across it at the last minute when i was desperate for a car but you know something is wrong when you put more money into your daily driver then your project car to keep it going. I've put almost 1500$ into the camaro and the water pump just blew and dont want to put anymore money into it. I'm just going to sell it for 3500$ hopefully and put it in the bank and daily drive the fox until i come across a good deal on an sn95
__________________
1998 Mustang GT
1988 Mustang GT
1998 Camaro Z28

and i'm only 18!
BladeX10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:46 PM   #27
projectresto83
5th Gear Member
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 83 GLX, 93 LX, 98 sixer
Location: Indiana(Stationed in Texas)
Posts: 4,169
Default

shows ya that GM's suck lol.
__________________

Off building sand castles in the middle east
projectresto83 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:59 PM   #28
Sidewayz6.0
Super Moderator
 
Sidewayz6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Vehicle: '88 GT
Location: IL
Posts: 10,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by projectresto83 View Post
shows ya that GM's suck lol.
I wouldn't have said that with the car that you have in your sig...Just sayin' LOL

And Blade, if you're unloading that LS1 Camaro for $3500...Send me some pics, and a location. eblitz99@gmail.com
__________________

RIP Tripsevn7
Sidewayz6.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:41 PM   #29
projectresto83
5th Gear Member
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 83 GLX, 93 LX, 98 sixer
Location: Indiana(Stationed in Texas)
Posts: 4,169
Default

Lol, I'm just a broke SOB is all! The 93 looks much better than the 83
__________________

Off building sand castles in the middle east
projectresto83 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:21 PM   #30
AdderMk2
MF Attention Whore
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang Cobra
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 17,812
Send a message via AIM to AdderMk2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9redfox3 View Post
I'm I on Crack? Who's talking about the gasket i'm talking about valve covers and the one inch spacer needed on the upper intake just to change them out.Also about more ammo? Ok how much more computer friendly the fox's are and 200lb less weight or so than sn95.If your so crazy on your 95 why is it for sale?Nothing but a money pit you have....Go wax your bald head!
im selling my car because im leaving for afganistan
FWIW, i have non stock valve covers on my car, and it DOESNT require a 1" spacer,

foxes are not computer friendly, and the only reason why they allow you to run more mods with less tuning, is because the tune isnt as refined as it is in the SN95 computer. The SN system is FAR superior. its a faster processor, had better diagnostic systems, AND will run a car with major mods just fine, as long as the car is mechanically sound in the first place.

As far as the 200lb difference, GT to GT, its about a 100lb difference.
__________________
Siggy removed by Administration.

^^^
The Man is trying to oppress me...

Last edited by mjr46; 11-03-2009 at 11:50 PM. Reason: language,
AdderMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1988, 88, 94, fox, front, gt, mustang, oem, suspensions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company