5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

5.0 or 5.8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2011, 01:38 AM
  #1  
EI-03-GT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
EI-03-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 234
Default 5.0 or 5.8?

So i am looking into getting a new mustang here in a few months and i want to got with a over head valve instead of the over head cam. Well i was wondering if it would be worth it to try and find a 5.8 and pay the little bit extra or should just stick with getting regular 5.0? Also what are the max numbers they are rated for in the stock form? I would be getting the 94-95 body style.. I guess i am just looking for a basic schooling in the 5.0/5.8 motors/cars.
EI-03-GT is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 04:39 AM
  #2  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

well, considering the ONLY mustang since 79 that came with a 5.8, was the 95 Cobra R.... you should probably buy one that has a 302.

Unless you are buying a car that is already complete(meaning not a project), you should try to find something as close to stock as possible.
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 09:46 AM
  #3  
EI-03-GT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
EI-03-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 234
Default

i thought their was only the cobra. i was asking if if was worth the extra money to buy?
EI-03-GT is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 10:46 AM
  #4  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

imho, a stock stroke 351 is a waste.
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 01:17 PM
  #5  
EI-03-GT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
EI-03-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 234
Default

Originally Posted by AdderMk2
imho, a stock stroke 351 is a waste.
Really? what makes you say this?
EI-03-GT is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 01:42 PM
  #6  
ProTrickVic
2nd Gear Member
 
ProTrickVic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
Default

Originally Posted by EI-03-GT
Really? what makes you say this?
stock 351 is a waste because of the extra weight, weight of rotating assembly, slower revs. unless you're getting a 351w base to upgrade it with a better bottom end and a good top end....its a waste of time and money. stick with the 302 and build the top end/valvetrain.
ProTrickVic is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:09 PM
  #7  
68CSTANG
3rd Gear Member
 
68CSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 816
Default

302. A 3" main is a boat anchor.
68CSTANG is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:18 PM
  #8  
5.0kid
5th Gear Member
 
5.0kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The mitten
Posts: 2,525
Default

Yup a stock windsor is a waste
5.0kid is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 08:47 PM
  #9  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

302 cheaper all around. 351 is a better foundation. Just my .02 local friend has 351w sbe good top end 200 shot runs 6.50. Dosent sound like much of a waste to me.
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 09:49 PM
  #10  
5.0kid
5th Gear Member
 
5.0kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The mitten
Posts: 2,525
Default

well a good top end and a 200 shot are way far off from stock, stock for stock a 302 much better
5.0kid is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 or 5.8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.