TFS stage 2 vs. E303
#1
TFS stage 2 vs. E303
Is anyone familiar with Desktop Dyno software? I use it as somewhat of a guideline to mess around with different cam and head ideas. Well keeping my setup the same, but changing the cam specs from tfs stage 2 to e303, I make more torque earlier with the E303??!! I would've thought that the tfs 2 would've been light years better than the E cam, but?? any ideas?? I know there are a lot of other factors that would make it a "better cam", but the numbers don't lie unless the software is off...
E303 @ 0* TFS 2 @ -3*
2000 108 283 96 252
2500 140 294 128 269
3000 179 313 162 283
3500 225 338 207 311
4000 272 358 256 336
4500 320 373 306 357
5000 359 377 350 368
5500 390 373 384 366
6000 408 357 409 358
6500 413 334 423 342
7000 410 308 423 317
E303 @ 0* TFS 2 @ -3*
2000 108 283 96 252
2500 140 294 128 269
3000 179 313 162 283
3500 225 338 207 311
4000 272 358 256 336
4500 320 373 306 357
5000 359 377 350 368
5500 390 373 384 366
6000 408 357 409 358
6500 413 334 423 342
7000 410 308 423 317
#2
That desktop dyno software is total crap. The actual modeling software used by professional race teams to model things from header flow, to power, to intake flow etc costs thousands and thousands of dollars.
#5
I know they are more comparable to one another but why would the e cam look better than the tfs 2 anyway minus peak power...maybe it is just the software oh well. it just makes me weary of even trading for that cam...