Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang > 5.0L General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2013, 04:12 PM   #11
CID Vicious
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 89 5.0 'Vert
Location: Idaho
Posts: 29
Default

Glad to see some interest brewing here.

As for the center bearing and all that concern, two thoughts:

1) Folks on both sides of the pond have put 560SE V8s into these cars, so I'd say you've got some leeway. The W123 chassis was designed with a V8 in mind, but the car was literally so popular that MB couldn't keep up with the demand of the 'boring' versions. Although the 280E with a stick is hardly boring

2) Screw all that - you're going to need a custom driveshaft anyway. Might as well start with the proper Ford part in the front and choose which pumpkin you'll be going with, add appropriate part, measure shaft, order.There are folks at the Peach Parts, benzforums.org and/or Super Turbo Diesel forums who have done a lot of research on the chassis and apparently there's a typical Dodge part that mates fine with the rear pumpkin.

2.5) The pumpkin is stout but no lsd available. Possibly, just possibly, there's a stock Ford driveshaft that would be of a correct length to use with an 8.8 IRS pumpkin. Would require custom axles (Ford inner MB outer) but that's probably cheaper/easier than getting a good limited slip for these cars. Unless you want to try sourcing an AMG part from the 70's.

240D's have something akin to 3.68 or 3.90 gears depending on the year, the shallower gear probably more likely.

300D's came in two flavors, turbo and non, non were ~3.23 turbo ~3.08.

Remember that this car was designed with 14" wheels and no optional upsize. I'd go, personally, with late model C230 wheels in the 'torque thrust' style, 17" all around. Fit the wheels first and then start messing around with cutting springs (absolutely ok on this suspension), the front springs sport 14 coils, and I believe the rears are 11. You can -3 front -1.5 rear and get a really, really good sporting setup, ideal even, but be prepared to spring for the skid plate to protect the pan, too.

Might get around it depending on the pan you go with but most likely it'll be the 5.0 double sump and believe me, pulling over and shoving Water Weld in a hole bleeding hot oil gets old quick. However, I was running lower profile tires on stock wheels and some 45/50 series tires on 17's would likely raise it up a bit even with the same setting, and I have no idea how better/worse a 5.0 would be in the same car with the same springs as yet. I also have no idea how rubbing would be an issue with said 17's but MB and other Euro makes tend to make the suspension do the heavy lifting, and not the tires, so if you go with stock C230 sizes you'll likely be ok.

Personally I'd take it slowly, I don't know of anyone who has 'seriously' done this and posted his settings, ie like 'serious' as in went to the auto cross or track day and posted whatever time in a field with X cars of Y type.

I'm thinking, after having lowered 3 of these cars, that when I get around to 5.0'ing a W123, I'm going to try and add wheel and keep as much wheel travel as possible. The 14" factory rollers run 185/70/14s on 240D, 205s on 300Ds, and they're balonies, to be sure. If you want handling get rid of the obvious slop (ie the giganto sidewalls) and proceed from there. I'd be surprised if muscle car folk especially weren't happy with a nice, mild front rake (like -1 or -1.5 coils) and stock rear.

Lesjofors (sp?) makes a heavy duty rear spring that folks use to get rid of the SLS suspension on the wagons and it would probably help quite a bit to control the rear and make the car more neutral without having to lower it and lose utility (not to mention camber and thus contact patch in a straight line - the rear suspension is NOT adjustable for camber, so if you lower it, you'll be negative all the time). The Lesjofors springs would likely have to be cut, refit, and cut again in small increments to really get it right.

However anyone who has done a similar project in a car with truly zero aftermarket options (there are a few spring companies out there who offer springs but they often - shocker! - require trimming to fit) the mere ability to actually cut and adjust springs in such a way is a blessing. And yes, I've driven my lowered cars, hard, my old 240D was quite a nice canyon carver. I had all three cars for extended times and no problems developed, and I've not yet heard of anyone complaining of a failure after properly cutting the spring, how-tos are all over the above mentioned forums, as are debates on how good of an idea it is.

There are other concerns - unrelated motor/trans going into unrelated body, surprise! - but I'll hold off here since it's already a huge post
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
CID Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 04:23 PM   #12
CID Vicious
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 89 5.0 'Vert
Location: Idaho
Posts: 29
Default

Also, I don't know about anyone else's direction, but I'm going after a very doable/liveable, semi-stock driving experience. Many Euro cars are damn good drives with modest amounts of power (many NA BMWs are sub 250hp, yet are considered sports cars by most who drive them). Said refined chassis with even a stock-ish V8 should be quite a fun time and the simpler I keep it, the more likely that I'll like the end result and want to drive it every day, not just on weekends.

That said, and considering I've been uncovering tests that show that the 5.0's main 'cork' is the awful, awful heads, and that it's fairly hotly cammed from the factory, I'm thinking a few simple mods, invest in a good set of aluminum heads, custom exhuast necessary anyway, and whatever I get, I get. 300hp would be quite fine by me, more even finer, but having it be tame and everyday drivable and getting whatever power I can while maintaining it is the goal.

At such an output level using a T5 is doable, hell the thing will probably never hook anyway . Scatter that and it's Tremec time.

Sticky tires, whatever combination of springs and sway bars proves to be 'correct', Bilstein HD shocks, and S class brakes. Many upsized brake options from the MB parts bin are swappable but late 80's S class binders are easy, early W126 vented disks bolt on even behind the factory 14's and require no trips to the junkyard to make work.

Simple, 300hp/3200lb car, German suspension, chassis, brakes, and a nice sleeper package to wrap it all up in - I've mistaken the W123 for a Volvo 240 while driving my own W123. To say it's a sleeper even in such a mild form would be no exaggeration.

Might not be able to face off with GT500s and ZL1s and the like but I'll look into it when I got the coin to try and beat the factory at it's own game - probably take more than the 60k they want!

Really, though, if it's swapped, done, and I like the result, hey, the 'making it faster' bit is all Mustang, shouldn't be too hard
CID Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 11:21 PM   #13
DoctorEuroCar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Vehicle: 1995 Mercedes E320 5.0/T5
Location: Florida
Posts: 1
Default

Well Im about to go the exact same route. I have a 1994 Mercedes E320 and about to drop in a 1993 Mustang 5.0 v8 and Tremec 3550. I could give a hoot about the purists, this my darn car.

I have 20 years experience repairing and modifying European cars trained in Germany by Mercedes Benz.. that being said unless you have the bucks go get the hottest v8 or v12 you end up with a car that has excellent brakes, superb handling and about 100 hp less than it ought to have.

My last Mustang was a 1967 Convertible in 2008 now I have a 1994 Mercedes E320 Convertible that has been a custom turbo with 366rwhp for last 3 years, I', on the second transmission in two years and the turbo is tired.

I picked up a 93 5.0 block
and im going to build it, even with the best parts it wont come close to rebuilding the stock engine and trans which is also getting tired.

Last small block Ford engine I built for a customer did 404 rwhp NA from a 347 with AFR heads, with a single 750 carb...Im being conservative and plan to build a reliable powerplant with at least 350 ft lbs torque not to concerned with Hp, once i get it dialed in then ill look into forced induction to power my Benz. A/c is a must and everything must fit under hood with any hood scoop.

I say your project can be done because I have done it before 15 years ago when my welding/fabrication skills were entering preschool...
DoctorEuroCar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 11:21 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
240d, 50, 95, classic, drag, driveline, engine, ho, mercedes, mustang, noise, performance, racing, swap, w123

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup