Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

To Make Sure Everyone Knows You Got A 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2009, 04:32 PM
  #11  
SMiller
2nd Gear Member
 
SMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 168
Default

Looks good to me!
SMiller is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 05:00 PM
  #12  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by Olythekid
I sure would take the 5.0 if u give it to me but I'm far from bitter. Hell I have a 7.5L on my firebird

Like I said, why should I get all worked up over a 0.4L displacement increase? ... especially since the competition is busting out 1L more. I had a 5.0 Ford on my 87 Lincoln, bullet proof engine, thing got me all over the US.
So Ford may even squize out 400HP N/A ... then what? So much more potential for HP with a 6.0.

I ain't hating, it's just my 2cts.
It's not the displacement increase that matters, its the 100hp increase. There's more to making power then cubic inches.

This little 5.0 will smoke the 455 sitting in you flaming roaster even if you have the SD-455.

Last edited by 83gtragtop; 06-18-2009 at 05:02 PM.
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 05:16 PM
  #13  
Olythekid
1st Gear Member
 
Olythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 98
Default

Ok yeah .... it's cute. You totaly missed my point.
Olythekid is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 05:17 PM
  #14  
GerRod
2nd Gear Member
 
GerRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
It's not the displacement increase that matters, its the 100hp increase. There's more to making power then cubic inches.
Well said. Heads, valve train, and cams play very important roles in making power. Look at professional racing such as NHRA prostock. The cubes stay the same, however, the cars get faster and faster every year!
GerRod is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 05:40 PM
  #15  
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
1slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 8,146
Default

Ford is using the 5.0 badge

https://mustangforums.com/forum/must...owertrain.html
1slow67 is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 05:54 PM
  #16  
Olythekid
1st Gear Member
 
Olythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 98
Default

I definitly agree with that, but the less displacement you have the more you'll have to squize the HPs with more agressive cams/head chamber design/headers ... making ur engine "weacker". Then when you'll already have the max out of your engine, aftermarket mods will not bring much more to the table, nor will your $$$ blower.

Comparatively, a much higher cube engine will pull the same HP with less efforts, last longer and allow much more room for improvements.

5.0 is for marketing playing on nostalgia, they can make 400HP with todays 4.6L already. Screew the little 5.0, give us a 5.7 - 6.something so we can really get all crazy. Then only I'll get excited.

Last edited by Olythekid; 06-18-2009 at 05:57 PM.
Olythekid is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 06:12 PM
  #17  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

Originally Posted by Olythekid
I definitly agree with that, but the less displacement you have the more you'll have to squize the HPs with more agressive cams/head chamber design/headers ... making ur engine "weacker". Then when you'll already have the max out of your engine, aftermarket mods will not bring much more to the table, nor will your $$$ blower.

Comparatively, a much higher cube engine will pull the same HP with less efforts, last longer and allow much more room for improvements.

5.0 is for marketing playing on nostalgia, they can make 400HP with todays 4.6L already. Screew the little 5.0, give us a 5.7 - 6.something so we can really get all crazy. Then only I'll get excited.

I agree.
Big cube with a 6 spd.

BTW, didn't the 455 SD come with underated 300hp and 400lbs of torque because of insurance reasons??
I'd like to know the real numbers, despite its 8.0:1 compression ratio...
pascal is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 06:41 PM
  #18  
Olythekid
1st Gear Member
 
Olythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 98
Default

It wasn't really the insurance as much as it was the new emission standard. We talking 1973 here, the original SD was said to pull 370HPs (same numbers as 70s 400 blocks), but they couldn't pass emission. So they put a smaller cam, and ended up with 290HP.
My 455 is not a SD, just a regular 455, 250HP-370TQ <sight> My car have a non restored matching number stock engine, 140,000 miles and runs 14.5 1/4 mile. Needs a rebuild but geezbus ... talk about strong. Due to the small cam, just replacing the cam and buying Edelbrock heads will bring from 250 to 440HP at the cranck. Not bad.

The insurance thingy was with the 67, or maybe the 70. Pontiac installed a "block" under the gas pedal that prevented u from going WOT, thus limiting the HPs. All u had to do was to remove it. The things u could get away with in those days lol

As for our Mustang ... they should put the FR 521 hehe

Last edited by Olythekid; 06-18-2009 at 06:43 PM.
Olythekid is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 08:12 PM
  #19  
nj07
2nd Gear Member
 
nj07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 434
Talking

hell we should be bitter we don't have 83 conv. with a 5.0, it makes me sad.
nj07 is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 08:32 PM
  #20  
o7 tungsten
3rd Gear Member
 
o7 tungsten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: san antonio
Posts: 576
Default

i would have thought ford would use the gt style font, saw this pic on another forum

o7 tungsten is offline  


Quick Reply: To Make Sure Everyone Knows You Got A 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.