Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

True RWHP of 11 GT??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:19 AM
  #1  
NaplesFL11GT
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
NaplesFL11GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 611
Default True RWHP of 11 GT??

What is the real true RWHP of this motor? First I seen 395rwhp and now I am seeing 365-369rwhp.
NaplesFL11GT is offline  
Old 06-19-2010, 08:59 AM
  #2  
Snakebite64
4th Gear Member
 
Snakebite64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,532
Default

It all depends on what dyno is being used to do the testing.
Snakebite64 is offline  
Old 06-19-2010, 12:01 PM
  #3  
Joe in Dublin
2nd Gear Member
 
Joe in Dublin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ca
Posts: 262
Default

Dyno, which gear car is in, all the engines will be different, 412 is the minimum at the crank, some may make 430 who knows, 365 to 385 sounds like the range at wheels
Joe in Dublin is offline  
Old 06-19-2010, 01:57 PM
  #4  
Driver72
3rd Gear Member
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 632
Default

Originally Posted by NaplesFL05GT
What is the real true RWHP of this motor? First I seen 395rwhp and now I am seeing 365-369rwhp.
395 rwhp was an overly optimistic or not properly calibrated dyno.

In the SAE testing of the 5.0 Ford got 416 hp from the "crank".
They choose to rate it at 412 hp as the SAE gives manufacturers a 1% variance. Ford "legally" could of rated the engine at 420 hp as it's within the 1% range, but better to under rate than over.
Also keep in mind those are not well seasoned broke in engines, so you can "expect" to see a bit more when broke in, but it still has to be rated at a power level it can make even when "green".

On a manual rwd car with solid rear axle, you'll get 12-14% drivetrain loss on average.

Figure 12-13% then as a fair guesstimate for the Mustang.

416 true engine hp - 12.5% = 364 rwhp

Keep in mind every engine is slightly different and weather and break in miles and so forth will also affect the outcome.

So on a properly calibrated dyno with a properly broke in and running engine expect to see:

355 rwhp on the low side if you have a weaker running "green" engine
375 rwhp on the higher side if you have a strong running and/or broke in engine.
Driver72 is offline  
Old 06-19-2010, 05:54 PM
  #5  
SpartaPerformance
4th Gear Member
 
SpartaPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,291
Default

Depends on dyno and correction factor, Dyno Jet usually will give you high numbers while a Dyno Dynamics wont. I would say 355-375 would be accurate depending on the above.
SpartaPerformance is offline  
Old 06-19-2010, 06:28 PM
  #6  
Gene K
5th Gear Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 2,176
Default

True flywheel is 416 bhp.

Hard to say exactly. i dont know how much power it takes to drive the new manual trans.

Total SWAG on a typical Dynojet?
3.73 - 50 miles - bad end of tolerances might be 360 rwhp,
3.31 - 15,000 miles - good end of tolerances might be 380 rwhp,

I think Sparta's numbers would be pretty close if it wasnt for the Dynojets tendency to show less loss at higher hp numbers. In some really high power applications its rumored to actually have gone negative (Dynojet showed more than engine dyno) but I have not personally witnessed this anomaly.

Last edited by Gene K; 06-19-2010 at 06:39 PM.
Gene K is offline  
Old 06-20-2010, 05:59 PM
  #7  
NaplesFL11GT
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
NaplesFL11GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Gene K
True flywheel is 416 bhp.

Hard to say exactly. i dont know how much power it takes to drive the new manual trans.

Total SWAG on a typical Dynojet?
3.73 - 50 miles - bad end of tolerances might be 360 rwhp,
3.31 - 15,000 miles - good end of tolerances might be 380 rwhp,
Going to a lower gear kills that much hp? I knew it did but didnt think it killed that much.
NaplesFL11GT is offline  
Old 06-20-2010, 06:20 PM
  #8  
ronniegibson1978
2nd Gear Member
 
ronniegibson1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tn.
Posts: 347
Default

and then you gotta factor in how far above sea level you are..if you're in the mtns, you're gonna see like 20hp less than other places...elevation sucks
ronniegibson1978 is offline  
Old 06-20-2010, 06:22 PM
  #9  
Gene K
5th Gear Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 2,176
Default

Originally Posted by NaplesFL05GT
Going to a lower gear kills that much hp? I knew it did but didnt think it killed that much.
Reread my post. Gears were only a minor part of the change. Most was just production differences and the difference between 50 miles and 15,000 miles. Power usually peaks between 10,000-20,000 miles.
Gene K is offline  
Old 06-21-2010, 02:02 PM
  #10  
Mike@DiabloSport
Former Sponsor
 
Mike@DiabloSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 503
Default

Originally Posted by NaplesFL05GT
What is the real true RWHP of this motor? First I seen 395rwhp and now I am seeing 365-369rwhp.
Here are some very real numbers for you, before and after being tuned on 93 octane, bone stock car.

Mike@DiabloSport is offline  


Quick Reply: True RWHP of 11 GT??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.