Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

Stock air box vs k&n filter

Old 02-02-2014, 11:31 AM
  #11  
Goldenpony
5th Gear Member
 
Goldenpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,319
Default

Originally Posted by Xann27
On this note, I run a 14 GT premium, and it has the stock CAI. i rounded 14k miles and did the service at Camelback Ford in Phoenix. they said i need to replace the filter asap, as Arizona air has TONS more dust in it (microscopic) than most other places in the U.S.. When I took the filter out, sure as snot the filter was brown and blotchy. Heres the issue I have. As the GT is mainly highway miles, 60 round trip per day, and i get about 24mpg, I replaced the filter with a WIX from Oriely. The guy there said K&N units on newer mustangs are very unwise. as the factory stuff is better. They didnt sell motorcraft units, so I snagged the WIX unit for $12. hell of a deal. after a few days i noticed the MPG dropped considerably. Im hovering around 20-21mpg. same driving style, cooler ambient temps as well. Whats the deal? should I kick the WIX and go with Motorcraft again? I enjoy having the 5.0 and getting 24mpg... but losing MPG is kinda painful.

Sounds to me like you've answered your own question.
Goldenpony is offline  
Old 02-02-2014, 03:01 PM
  #12  
miner999r
1st Gear Member
 
miner999r's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 52
Default

I think the factory air filter / intake is good enough on stock engines. Maybe if you are going to a built up motor with significantly more hp and air requirements would an aftermarket intake be noticeably beneficial. Just my opinion.
miner999r is offline  
Old 02-02-2014, 04:09 PM
  #13  
JAJ
2nd Gear Member
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by Xann27
On this note, I run a 14 GT premium, and it has the stock CAI. i rounded 14k miles and did the service at Camelback Ford in Phoenix. they said i need to replace the filter asap, as Arizona air has TONS more dust in it (microscopic) than most other places in the U.S.. When I took the filter out, sure as snot the filter was brown and blotchy. Heres the issue I have. As the GT is mainly highway miles, 60 round trip per day, and i get about 24mpg, I replaced the filter with a WIX from Oriely. The guy there said K&N units on newer mustangs are very unwise. as the factory stuff is better. They didnt sell motorcraft units, so I snagged the WIX unit for $12. hell of a deal. after a few days i noticed the MPG dropped considerably. Im hovering around 20-21mpg. same driving style, cooler ambient temps as well. Whats the deal? should I kick the WIX and go with Motorcraft again? I enjoy having the 5.0 and getting 24mpg... but losing MPG is kinda painful.


The ECU doesn't know or care what kind of filter you have, and it won't change any settings because of it. As MrSandman said, the stock airbox can deliver more air than the engine can use, and even if you put in a filter with different characteristics, the ECU compensates on the fly - mixtures and power don't change.


If you are getting poorer fuel economy, it isn't the filter that's causing it.
JAJ is offline  
Old 02-02-2014, 09:45 PM
  #14  
Xann27
1st Gear Member
 
Xann27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 82
Default

I haven't changed the way I drive. Just the air filter. I guess I'll go for a motor craft unit tomorrow.
Xann27 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM
inyadreems
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
2
08-21-2015 09:10 AM
SANDY21
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
08-17-2015 02:41 PM
WDScott
New Member Area
7
08-17-2015 06:38 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Stock air box vs k&n filter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.