5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Steeda 19 vs E303

Old 10-03-2008, 01:02 PM
  #1  
USMC1775
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
USMC1775's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The P.R.K.
Posts: 1,975
Default Steeda 19 vs E303

So I have been planning to put a Steeda 19 in my new engine, but I came up on a perfect cond E303 for $80, wondering if anyone who has either has input on them. I drive the car daily, and never go to the strip.

I know they are neither the hottest cams out there, but I have to smog in California. So what am I looking at with the E303? The website says they recommend 1.6, but what would happen with 1.7s? It also says if I use 1.6s I can use stock pushrods?

Opinions wanted
USMC1775 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 02:35 PM
  #2  
USMC1775
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
USMC1775's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The P.R.K.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Oh come on I know theres 100 guys in here with the E cam
USMC1775 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 04:55 PM
  #3  
DeltaElite121
2nd Gear Member
 
DeltaElite121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 480
Default

I'm running 1.7's with my E303, and there's no issues. E303's sound great, and they sound even better with a set of 1.7's. As long as the lobes are in good shape, I'd probably go for it. That and no rust and all that, but you said it's perfect so should be no issues there.

E-303's are great if you ask me. They are a great starter cam, and aren't picky at all. Pretty much plug and play. I like mine.

Last edited by DeltaElite121; 10-03-2008 at 04:57 PM.
DeltaElite121 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 07:23 PM
  #4  
USMC1775
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
USMC1775's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The P.R.K.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Anyone else have thoughts?
USMC1775 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 07:54 PM
  #5  
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Temple, Texas
Posts: 15,481
Default

Yea, I do, 94-95s hate cams, and the Steeda #19 was designed specifically for the 94/95 ecus that are overly cam sensitive. The Steeda cam is also designed with newer technology making it a dual stage cam, as opposed to the single stage E303. This is a critical part of your engine, just spend the extra $100 and get the better part that's actually designed for your car. Don't get me wrong, E303s will work, but the #19 is the much better/easier way to go IMO.
jthorn9 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 08:05 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

I'd get the steeda #19
mjr46 is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 01:29 PM
  #7  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default

the Steeda cam doesn't have a CARB EO number so Idk if you can even use it in Cali.
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 02:57 PM
  #8  
Explosive
Moderator
 
Explosive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,264
Default

We have an E303, nice cam. It has some lope to the idle which I love. We have stock length hardened pushrods (6.25) and 1.6 rockers.
Explosive is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 05:16 PM
  #9  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default

Originally Posted by USMC1775
So I have been planning to put a Steeda 19 in my new engine, but I came up on a perfect cond E303 for $80, wondering if anyone who has either has input on them. I drive the car daily, and never go to the strip.

I know they are neither the hottest cams out there, but I have to smog in California. So what am I looking at with the E303? The website says they recommend 1.6, but what would happen with 1.7s? It also says if I use 1.6s I can use stock pushrods?

Opinions wanted
With 1.7s the cam goes from .498 lift to .529

The only way to know what length pushrods you need is to personally check, nobody can tell you what size you need based on random parts you're running. It is possible the stock length is okay but going with a cam you're going to need stronger than stock valve springs which I would then recommend getting hardened pushrods so the stock garbage doesn't bed and mess up your entire valvetrain, so in a nutshell check the pushrod length no matter what and buy the correct size hardened pushrods.
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 06:22 PM
  #10  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Originally Posted by jthorn9
Yea, I do, 94-95s hate cams, and the Steeda #19 was designed specifically for the 94/95 ecus that are overly cam sensitive. The Steeda cam is also designed with newer technology making it a dual stage cam, as opposed to the single stage E303. This is a critical part of your engine, just spend the extra $100 and get the better part that's actually designed for your car. Don't get me wrong, E303s will work, but the #19 is the much better/easier way to go IMO.
SN95's systems have taken a bad wrap regarding typical OTS cams installation....... by error, IMHO. I've not had any problems installing/setting the alphabet cams (Z excluded), TFS or others, nor any complains regarding driveability either. Can the system benefit from improvements in the tune?.... obviously, even fox based EEC systems do.... but "limiting" cam selection for the SN95, based on speed density requirements, or "LSA" requirements that don't apply....... is wrong.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Florida Regional Chapter
0
09-30-2015 08:04 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Steeda 19 vs E303



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.